Half a year finally accepted. After submission, it was quickly sent to the associate editor within one or two days, and the associate editor waited half a month to start the review process. The deadline for reviewers should be one month. Due to not being able to find a reviewer, it took a long time to be accepted. The flow direction of fluid should be relatively slow, while the heat direction should be relatively fast.

(0) 讚！ | SS

I give up, I won't submit anymore. It's been four months since I submitted and there has been no response. It will be five months soon. I have reminded them several times.

(0) 讚！ | 革哥儿

How are you doing now?

(0) 讚！ | 部部部部部

The chief editor assigned a deputy editor, there was no choice. When submitting a paper, authors can choose a direction (heat and fluid flow). The Canadian chief editor is responsible for the fluid flow direction, while the other Chinese chief editor is responsible for the heat direction. Another article was submitted to this journal (in the fluid flow direction), and the chief editor assigned it to another deputy editor (Philipp Schlatter). Although only one reviewer was willing to review within two months and had already completed the review within one month, the deputy editor did not give up on finding additional reviewers. He continuously added new reviewers every half month, showing great dedication.

(0) 讚！ | SS

Chinese editors have such a style, I never choose Chinese editors for my submissions.

(0) 讚！ | Mrwenwen

Bingchen Wang, this editor is so pretentious, always showing off. My paper doesn't focus on algorithms, and the rejection reason asked me to come up with some algorithm innovations. I really can't believe it.

(0) 讚！ | SS

Boss, may I ask how long you have been investing and what is your current status?

(0) 讚！ | star1234

Excuse me, how many reviewers does this journal need?

(0) 讚！ | star1234

Accepted with revisions, the aerodynamic direction of the impeller machinery has been submitted. The submission process took a little over two months, and the editorial team was efficient in handling the manuscript. The review comments were constructive, but unfortunately, the impact factor is not high. This interdisciplinary journal on fluid heat transfer is under the Auswell group and is open for submissions.

(1) 讚！ | Collinn

How long will it take for the big guys to have news with e? Will changing the editor make it faster? Don't take too long, can't wait, cancel the draft ?

(0) 讚！ | Xcr

Hello, may I ask how long it will take for WE to be reviewed?

(0) 讚！ | wqf99

Is it SCI? Why not?

(0) 讚！ | 林深时间路

The withdrawal was made, and the editor-in-chief wrote in the email, "Although we have been trying very hard to find enough reviewers, we still couldn't find a sufficient number." I want to say, it's not true, you didn't even make an effort. It's a waste of half a year.

(1) 讚！ | 风枫之

It's really outrageous. I've been waiting for half a year for my submission with no response. Two reviewers accepted the review but never replied, and the editor has been inactive as well. The last time any editing was done was 4 months ago. I've contacted the customer service of the publisher three times with no response, withdrew my submission once with no response, and even emailed the editor with no reply. It's like dealing with a deadbeat.

(0) 讚！ | 风枫之

I withdrew the manuscript twice, and the editor finally took action, but did not withdraw the manuscript. Instead, two more were submitted, but only one was accepted for review. It has been over two weeks and there has been no feedback on the review yet.

(0) 讚！ | 风清扬

Submitted for review the day after submission, but the second reviewer did not provide feedback for over two months. The editor has just found another reviewer

(0) 讚！ | 风枫之

Thunderbolt avoidance, the submission was sent for review quickly, but no one seems to be accepting the manuscript for review. Without sending it, they just keep dragging it on. They can't even withdraw the submission

(0) 讚！ | 风清扬

Why is the Manuscript Number for the PDF production different from the one in the confirmation email?

(0) 讚！ | 1

A rare and freak journal. The manuscript being with editor for four months, I was told the theme did not match. Don’t you know that the theme does not match in a five-minute browse??? If no change of the editor in chief, I would not submit to this again.

(2) 讚！ | lu1563

This journal is very proud. After submitting the manuscript, with the editor for more than a month, it was not sent for review. After sending an email, it was rejected. The rejection email was a general template..

(2) 讚！ | upc_lng

The review speed is OK, the hit difficulty is medium, I feel that it was a very good journal before, and now it is quite satisfactory.

(0) 讚！ | turpope

Revised and changed after more than one year, too slow

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

一字 Slow!I have been engaged in a formal recruitment for a whole year, but I don’t know the Year of the Monkey!A reviewer, accepted after two revisions, is worth a year. It seems that this journal IF has been rising...

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Slow review. Sent a reminder with a blunt reply. Came back with only 1 reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I thought it was very fast, but now with the editor has been more than two months, has not entered the state, dare to remind the draft

(0) 讚！ | 匿名