What is the situation now, OP? This is my second submission, and it has been two weeks without any changes.

(0) 讚！ | libration

4.13 Receive

(0) 讚！ | dabaigou

How long does it usually take for reviewers to accept review invitations for this journal? If no one accepts the invitation for a long time, will the editor reject the submission?

(0) 讚！ | LvTu

1.19 Submission
3.05 Major revision, two reviewers
3.23 Revision
4.8 Required Reviews Completed

(0) 讚！ | dabaigou

How is it going after resubmission? Has it been reviewed?

(0) 讚！ | libration

Could anyone please share the specific content of the 13 proposed modifications? Any kind-hearted person willing to share would be greatly appreciated.

(0) 讚！ | liangjr

Oh, thank you!

(0) 讚！ | 芳华待灼

May I ask how long it takes for the submission to be reviewed after the second submission? It has been 2 weeks since the submission, and it is still in the "waiting for editor" status. Is this speed normal?

(0) 讚！ | @movingmoving

Someone said it was passed from the editor-in-chief to the deputy editor, but whether it is good or bad is hard to say.

(1) 讚！ | @movingmoving

Excuse me, what does it mean when the date of the "with editor" stage changes? Is it a good thing or a bad thing?

(0) 讚！ | 芳华待灼

3.24 Resubmitted after modification.

(0) 讚！ | 阿树111

What does it mean to receive these 13 suggestions for resubmission after rejection from this journal? It feels like a template.

(2) 讚！ | LvTu

Thank you, OP. With that being said, the word count requirement for the content has been significantly eased.

(0) 讚！ | @movingmoving

Record of the fastest submission:
1.2 With editor
1.8 With editor
1.11 Under review
1.24 Required reviews completed
2.9 With editor
2.16 Under review
3.1 Under review
3.13 Required reviews completed
3.14 Accepted
A very efficient submission, many thanks to the editor and reviewers, wishing the journal continued success!

(0) 讚！ | Wenxi Li

3.16 Format modification

(0) 讚！ | 阿树111

3.6 Submission, but did not receive an email. Still do not know the article code. Unable to check the progress on the iThinker public account. Any classmates in the same situation? Is this normal?

(0) 讚！ | 阿树111

Thank you to editor Min Soo Kim B.

(0) 讚！ | 拾早

Submission on January 4, 2026;
On January 11, 2026, the editor provided feedback on the template and requested resubmission after revisions;
Resubmission on January 14, 2026;
On January 19, 2026, the editor once again provided feedback on the template and requested resubmission after revisions;
Resubmission on January 21, 2026, this time made modifications according to the editor's formatting suggestions, especially in terms of references, which were reduced to less than 60, and added the latest articles related to heat transfer;
Under review on January 29, 2026;
Required revisions and resubmission on February 12, 2026;
Minor revisions on February 17, 2026;
Revision required on February 26, 2026;
Accepted on March 12, 2026.
The overall process took less than two months, with most of the time spent waiting for the editor's response, which was very efficient. The review period was exceptionally short, setting a new record. The reviewers' feedback was also very professional and helpful in improving the quality of the article.
Finally, wishing everyone smooth submissions!

(1) 讚！ | 拾早

First review: 4/1/0, no second person took over. Subsequently became 8/2/0. Major repairs were given.

(0) 讚！ | Mr BBean

Are there first and second reviewers for this submission?

(0) 讚！ | 我是斟茶兵

25.11.20 First submission
25.11.28 Editor provided 13 suggestions (asked around, seems to be the same), requested revisions and resubmission
25.12.01 Second submission
26.01.26 Received reviewer comments, major revisions (editor consulted two rounds of reviewers)
26.02.10 Returned revised manuscript
26.02.14 1/2/2
26.03.10 Accept

(0) 讚！ | Mr BBean

The first reviewer responded in three days after the submission on November 11th, 25 years. The second reviewer has not replied yet. After following up, the editor mentioned that the manuscript is currently under peer review, so please be patient.

(0) 讚！ | 师兄单身换稿子必中

How are things going now? Have you sent the demand letter yet?

(0) 讚！ | 小神仙7

The official website states that the length of the research paper should not exceed 40 pages (1.5 line spacing, 12-point font), with each figure counting as one page. Figures should be placed at the end of the main text. The number of references should be limited to no more than 50. If there are more than 5 authors for the paper, the corresponding author must provide detailed explanations of each co-author's contributions. Only authors who have made significant contributions can be listed as co-authors.

However, personally, I believe that the 40 pages refer only to the main text and do not include figures and images. In total, my paper is around 50 pages, and the editor has not raised any concerns about it.

(0) 讚！ | Bowen

May I ask what specific feedback you have for the first draft? I am preparing the article based on the user submission guidelines, but they are not very detailed, so I am a bit confused.

(0) 讚！ | @movingmoving