The processing time of the journal's official website is very unreliable, as it took more than a month for the submission to be reviewed. After sending an email to urge for review, they provided a desk rejection, wasting pure time.

(0) 讚！ | 铁卒

No change.

(0) 讚！ | 腻呢23

Is there any follow-up? The submission from the end of May has still not been reviewed by a second reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | crimp

Is it like this? I see someone is in the status of "Under review (8-0-0)", doesn't this mean that 8 people have been invited but no one has reviewed it?

(0) 讚！ | 铁卒

After this journal sends out invitations, it will remain in a "we" state until someone accepts the review.

(0) 讚！ | whlg wh

It's been a month in the editor's hands and we still haven't entered the review stage, is it this slow now?

(0) 讚！ | 铁卒

Later, another reviewer was invited.

(0) 讚！ | AlexanderM

7.13 接受

(0) 讚！ | whlg wh

6.14 UR
6.22 UR 1/1/2
7.11 ACCEPT
Both the reviewers and editors are very supportive, hoping the journal will continue to improve.

(0) 讚！ | liangjr

How are you doing now?

(0) 讚！ | whlg wh

Submitted for the first time on April 15, 2026, the submission was rejected by the editor-in-chief, but many revision suggestions were provided. After revising the manuscript according to the editor-in-chief's requirements, it was submitted again on April 30. Around June 10, major revisions were suggested, with feedback from three reviewers. The revised manuscript was resubmitted on June 17 and accepted on June 23. Overall, the review process was quite fast, and the editor-in-chief was also very responsible.

(0) 讚！ | 刘13

You can wait a little longer, it should be submitted for review. I submitted for review but no one responded, not sure what will happen.

(0) 讚！ | 每天七点起床

Original poster, I invested at 6.8 and it has been half a month since 6.9we, my situation has not changed. I envy you.

(0) 讚！ | David

I am also 2-2-1 and did not invite anyone new.

(0) 讚！ | 腻呢23

My second review is now 1-2-2, and the second reviewer has been waiting for a month and still hasn't replied.

(0) 讚！ | whlg wh

Hurry up, they said it's normal.

(0) 讚！ | 腻呢23

I can't believe this situation, oh my god.

(0) 讚！ | whlg wh

Especially magical, the editor said it was in the normal process.

(0) 讚！ | 腻呢23

I'm sorry, but you did not provide any text to translate. Could you please provide the text you would like me to translate into English?

(0) 讚！ | whlg wh

It has been nearly four months since the second trial, and the situation has remained unchanged.

(0) 讚！ | 腻呢23

Three reviewers, one minor revision, one major revision, and the last one suggested not to submit to HMT and provided feedback for major revision, but the feedback did not match the innovative points in the manuscript. Eventually, the editor rejected the submission. Difficult to evaluate.

(0) 讚！ | SONGHAOQI

Returned for revision, awaiting the response of the second reviewer for nearly a month.

(0) 讚！ | whlg wh

Sister, it seems like I also saw you on Xiaohongshu (Little Red Book).

(0) 讚！ | whlg wh

Every time my article is in the hands of the editor for no more than 12 hours, it is truly a well-established journal. Finally, mine has been accepted.

(1) 讚！ | Okke111

Finally got accepted, the editorial processing time for International Heat and Mass Transfer is particularly fast, with each round of editing taking no more than 12 hours in the hands of the editor. The reviewers are also very efficient, with each review process taking no more than 12 days. From submission to acceptance, this article only took 60 days, which is a very satisfying experience. Wishing IJH continued success, Dream Journal get! #

(0) 讚！ | Okke111