I encountered the same problem as you, and at the same time. The editor's job is to send it for external review, but the editor doesn't care whether the reviewers give feedback. Assuming that the reviewers don't provide feedback for a year, the situation will not change. On the other hand, the editor is not very interested in your article, so they are not actively pushing it forward.

(0) 讚！ | abcdefghijk

Is there something wrong with this journal? After submitting on 3.27, the editor provided 14 standard formatting suggestions for revision and resubmission. However, as of 4.7, the status is still "under review" and there have been 0 reviewers assigned according to the public account. After following up twice, I was told it is still in the process and to wait patiently. I am truly frustrated.

(0) 讚！ | slimwcq

Later on

(0) 讚！ | bangzheng

It has been four months since the first trial, but pushing and urging have not been effective at all.

(0) 讚！ | aopeuiq1568

What about the follow-up?

(0) 讚！ | bangzheng

Is there a dip process?

(0) 讚！ | bangzheng

The processing time of the journal's official website is very unreliable, as it took more than a month for the submission to be reviewed. After sending an email to urge for review, they provided a desk rejection, wasting pure time.

(0) 讚！ | 铁卒

No change.

(0) 讚！ | 腻呢23

Is there any follow-up? The submission from the end of May has still not been reviewed by a second reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | crimp

Is it like this? I see someone is in the status of "Under review (8-0-0)", doesn't this mean that 8 people have been invited but no one has reviewed it?

(0) 讚！ | 铁卒

After this journal sends out invitations, it will remain in a "we" state until someone accepts the review.

(0) 讚！ | whlg wh

It's been a month in the editor's hands and we still haven't entered the review stage, is it this slow now?

(0) 讚！ | 铁卒

Later, another reviewer was invited.

(0) 讚！ | AlexanderM

7.13 接受

(0) 讚！ | whlg wh

6.14 UR
6.22 UR 1/1/2
7.11 ACCEPT
Both the reviewers and editors are very supportive, hoping the journal will continue to improve.

(0) 讚！ | liangjr

How are you doing now?

(0) 讚！ | whlg wh

Submitted for the first time on April 15, 2026, the submission was rejected by the editor-in-chief, but many revision suggestions were provided. After revising the manuscript according to the editor-in-chief's requirements, it was submitted again on April 30. Around June 10, major revisions were suggested, with feedback from three reviewers. The revised manuscript was resubmitted on June 17 and accepted on June 23. Overall, the review process was quite fast, and the editor-in-chief was also very responsible.

(0) 讚！ | 刘13

You can wait a little longer, it should be submitted for review. I submitted for review but no one responded, not sure what will happen.

(0) 讚！ | 每天七点起床

Original poster, I invested at 6.8 and it has been half a month since 6.9we, my situation has not changed. I envy you.

(0) 讚！ | David

I am also 2-2-1 and did not invite anyone new.

(0) 讚！ | 腻呢23

My second review is now 1-2-2, and the second reviewer has been waiting for a month and still hasn't replied.

(0) 讚！ | whlg wh

Hurry up, they said it's normal.

(0) 讚！ | 腻呢23

I can't believe this situation, oh my god.

(0) 讚！ | whlg wh

Especially magical, the editor said it was in the normal process.

(0) 讚！ | 腻呢23