With editor for 20 days and still not sent for review, the speed of handling manuscripts by the hydrogen energy department is really slow this year.

(0) 讚！ | 黄老三

6.22-修改
7.09-接受
7.13-证据

(0) 讚！ | 小王12106

6.22- revise
7.9- Accept
7.13- Proof

(0) 讚！ | 小王12106

Do you know how to fix the formatting issues? Let me resubmit and upload a clean and marked-up version, but I can only upload one manuscript at a time. It has been rejected twice, so let me continue to revise it.

(0) 讚！ | Leo.MESSI

Please translate the following paragraph into English: "同问，编辑让我修改为机构邮箱拒稿重投"

The editor asked me to revise and resubmit the rejected manuscript using the institutional email address.

(0) 讚！ | bigzzzz

Does anyone know, if the author of a third work does not have an institutional email, and their submission is rejected, what should be done?

(0) 讚！ | sjq111

Okay. My three opinions are not back yet.

(0) 讚！ | 蓉宝抱抱

Invited 9 people, 5 agreed, but only two people showed up in the end.

(0) 讚！ | 小西奥9

How many reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | 蓉宝抱抱

4.2-submitted to journal
4.5-with editor
4.24-required reviews completed
5.16-revise
6.1-return for revision
6.4-under review
6.15-accept

The editor is very efficient, processing submissions within two to three days. They were also very patient, sending back the manuscript twice for formatting changes. I hope the journal continues to improve.

(0) 讚！ | 小西奥9

I have been waiting for half a month as well, the editor has not given any feedback yet. Even if it is rejected or sent for review, at least provide some feedback. This kind of delay is the most torturous.

(0) 讚！ | Hao_Liu

How is the result now? Have I been hired? It's been over half a month since my interview. Is the editor asleep?

(0) 讚！ | Hao_Liu

How about now, have I been hired?

(0) 讚！ | Hao_Liu

Is it two months until the second trial? That's a long time.

(0) 讚！ | Enthusiastic

6.22 接受

(0) 讚！ | 打败泰森

The first review opinions returned at the end of January have only been received and completed by one reviewer so far, and the editor has not processed them yet. Has anyone else encountered this situation before? How did you handle it?

(1) 讚！ | future2002

3.12-submitted to journal
3.15-with editor
3.18-under review
5.02-required reviews completed
5.20-revise
5.27-with editor
6.5-under review
6.21-accept

(0) 讚！ | hkjda

3.11-submitted to journal
3.20-with editor
4.14-under review
5.16-required reviews completed
5.30-revise
6.8-with editor
6.10-under review
6.16-required reviews completed

(0) 讚！ | 小王12106

Brothers, the impact factor has soared again, the first district is within easy reach, let's go!

(0) 讚！ | 我爱说点小实话

Could you please clarify if it is the desk rejection or the reviewer rejection?

(0) 讚！ | 多吉

Do you have any suggestions for submitting to this journal of pure computation? I feel that the depth of my purely computational work is deeper than what is published by them, but I get rejected as soon as I submit.

(0) 讚！ | 矮子师兄

Has there been any change in the mid-term schedule?

(0) 讚！ | 多吉

We were rejected half a month ago, it was too slow.

(0) 讚！ | 夏灼星

2026.1.31 Rejection and resubmission
2026.2.24 Under review
2026.3.27 Revised submission received, 11 reviewers assigned, 4 completed, 2 pending
2026.04.08 Reviewer invitation sent to 11, 13 accepted, 4 declined, currently 3 pending, RRC to UR
2026.05.04 Received reviewer comments (in addition to three reviewers' comments, editor also raised 8 issues)
2026.05.17 Revisions made
2026.05.31 Resubmitted, 3 reviewers assigned, 3 completed, 2 pending, RRC
2026.06.02 RRC to UR
The process is torture
206.06.06 RRC
2026.06.08 Another round of revisions received, editor has another question? Another question!
2026.06.09 Revisions resubmitted
2026.06.14 Still with editor
Brothers, beware of editor Gulfeza Kardas, who is extremely slow in processing and has a lot on their plate.

(0) 讚！ | SCI头号玩家

It's been a month, so it's okay to follow up. Different editors work at different speeds, and I feel like there's been a lot of submissions recently.

(0) 讚！ | 多吉