Only 2 people have accepted the review, it has been about a month now. Currently, one person has finished reviewing, but the other hasn't made any progress. In this situation, will the editor invite more reviewers? Should I write a letter to urge them? I am a little worried.

(0) 讚！ | 太空挖矿

Excuse me, how is the situation now? Are there any new reviewers joining?

(0) 讚！ | 5w

Now all three reviewers have provided their comments. The public account shows RRC, but the website still shows UR. It has been half a month without any updates. What's going on?

(0) 讚！ | 拾早

Brother, what advice did he give when he rejected it for the second time? Can we add him as a friend to discuss it further?

(0) 讚！ | Jy杨

Add me as a friend and let's communicate with each other.

(0) 讚！ | 奔跑者啊

Which editor are you? Also, I only see that 2+ reviewers have been assigned, why can't I see the details?

(0) 讚！ | qyzxwxf

7.18 The external audit, two reviewers receive the manuscript for review. 8.4 After reviewing one manuscript (the feedback in the rejection letter was quite good), 8.31 the editor did not wait for the second reviewer's opinion and gave a rejection, saying they could not find the reviewer and the review was not enough for two people. I only waited for about a month and a half, and they didn't even wait for the second reviewer? Moreover, if they couldn't find a reviewer, shouldn't they continue to invite others? How can they invite 15 and then stop? Sigh...

(0) 讚！ | Iceberg_zzzz

This journal is quite fast. The first submission was on May 12th. About 5 days later, the editor sent it for review, and around June 10th, the review comments came back from three reviewers in total. The editor first gave about 13 comments, such as title word limit, composite figures, formula layout, and other formatting issues. In addition, the three reviewers gave a total of 11 comments. The editor gave two months for revisions. I worked overtime and made the changes as required, and submitted it ahead of schedule. It was accepted in about a week later! I think as long as you are sincere and follow the editor's requirements, there should be no problem.

(1) 讚！ | Abaqus

That editor, the big shot.

(0) 讚！ | 不流泪的双鱼

Sent.

(0) 讚！ | 不流泪的双鱼

Major revisions were rejected by the editor, citing lack of maturity in research and innovation. I don't know what level of papers this journal is looking for anymore, does it not have a clear positioning? Who would want to publish their top-notch work in it. Two months wasted for nothing.

(1) 讚！ | 张特曼

The editor-in-chief of this journal has already made tens of millions in China, I don't know what people in the country are thinking.

(2) 讚！ | 小宝i

I heard that this editor-in-chief is traveling around the country, everyone should understand, this journal should be banned.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名用户##

Add as a friend, mine is also in the same situation.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名用户##

Seeking help from all the experts, after receiving 14 suggestions from the editor on my article, I made serious revisions. However, the editor informed me that I did not fully address his suggestions, so my submission was rejected. In this situation, is there still hope if I make further revisions and resubmit?

(0) 讚！ | afbjdsabfv

Which editor?

(0) 讚！ | 倾听SC

How did it turn out?

(0) 讚！ | MaH2001

It's mainly too exhausting.

(0) 讚！ | taylor1993

I can't just take a look at your paper and point out the issues to you directly. I suggest submitting it for a review instead. Polish the sentences, ensure coherence throughout the text, and pay attention to the finer details in the images.

(0) 讚！ | taylor1993

Asking for help from all the great gods, the first submission gave 14 suggestions for rejection and resubmission. After carefully revising and resubmitting, I was asked to revise again. After the third revision and submission, I was asked to revise again (last chance): You need to fully address all my comments instead of only some. You rushed and the graphics are still not up to scratch; I will give you one more chance with this material. Has anyone encountered this situation before? I really don't know how to make changes, and I don't know if I should continue to submit.

(0) 讚！ | aaaaaa所示

Exactly the same, very speechless...

(1) 讚！ | 论文一定能accept

The summary of metal friction is quite good, my fellow iron enthusiasts.

(0) 讚！ | 北极光0113

How long does the general first review of this journal usually take?

(0) 讚！ | 太空挖矿

May I ask why the editor said my article on machine learning and lifespan prediction does not match the content of the journal after submission? I saw articles related to my topic in IJMS.

(0) 讚！ | afbjdsabfv

Please reply point by point.

(0) 讚！ | Zhe Jiang