After revising it several times, I responded to the editor's modifications four or five times, only to be rejected for ethical reasons that did not include all experiments in the article.

(0) 讚！ | heyboy1987

Was it rejected after revision?

(0) 讚！ | 司格鲁肽

Do not submit to this magazine, the editors are extremely disrespectful to authors, often rejecting submissions for arbitrary reasons, and the various bizarre requests made after review are particularly unreasonable. It always feels like they are looking for trouble, hostile towards authors, and finding reasons to reject submissions. And if there is even a slight ethical issue, they will reject it. All of the magazines in that Greek publishing group are like this, they are completely a group of weird editors.

(0) 讚！ | heyboy1987

May I ask how fast the review process has been recently?

(0) 讚！ | 司格鲁肽

Can you reject it after accepting it?

(0) 讚！ | 司格鲁肽

Trash journals, even after acceptance, still come up with excuses for rejection, just trying to deceive people.

(0) 讚！ | 蓝兰@小8

Isn't it said that proof will be done very quickly? Is it proofreading that needs to be done, or editing for modification?

(0) 讚！ | 蓝兰@小8

I'm sorry, but "ctmd" does not appear to be a coherent sentence or phrase in any language. Could you please provide more context or clarify the text you would like me to translate into English?

(0) 讚！ | fxwl

How long have you been editing messages, ur?

(0) 讚！ | 蓝兰@小8

Can the authors be added during the experimental phase later on? Anyone have any information on this?

(0) 讚！ | MOX1234

How long did it take for the review process after you submitted the manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | 蓝兰@小8

The first time I encountered a journal that still rejected my submission after acceptance, the reason given was that the animal research did not meet ethical standards. I provided the ethics number from the school's animal center and proof, but they still claimed the evidence was not sufficient. It's really a garbage journal, cnmd.

(0) 讚！ | 活泼小学生

May I ask how long it takes for you to receive feedback for revisions after submission?

(0) 讚！ | 蓝兰@小8

Trash journal, they keep asking for revisions repeatedly after accepting, I've never seen anything like this before, it's been a month and still no Proof. Build a barrier everyone.

(0) 讚！ | xiangchen zeng

What does "Pending editor decision" mean? Does it mean we should reject it?

(0) 讚！ | Luck2025

I suggest you not invest in them. It's like picking bones out of eggs, if you don't want to review, just don't send it, haha.

(0) 讚！ | DrJhaha

Hello, Is the review process very slow? It takes 6 months. The reviewer's questions are very tricky

(0) 讚！ | jixiaomeng

So bad! No decent options at all

(0) 讚！ | DrJhaha

Stupid person, a useless researcher. Three years ago, I made a mistake during a police investigation, and my boss looked down on me deeply because of it. However, the journal still considers me somewhat friendly as I provide complete data and improve the formatting. I am meticulous about ethical issues and take time to respond. Typically, it takes about a week to receive a reply.

(0) 讚！ | DrJhaha

Hello, can I only use PayPal for online payment?

(0) 讚！ | 苍风怡然

Hello, can online payment only be made through PayPal?

(0) 讚！ | 苍风怡然

Do you need the original data?

(0) 讚！ | Bernie MacAdam

The impact factor trend is good, with a 77% acceptance rate for user comments.

(2) 讚！ | 必胜

The impact factor trend is good, with a score of 5.3 in February and a 77% acceptance rate.

(2) 讚！ | 必胜

8.4 repaired by the evening and received preliminary acceptance email on 8.5

(0) 讚！ | Evangeline Saxton