After submission, the status changed to "Under Review" the next day. Is it under review now? How long does it normally take to change the status?

(0) 讚！ | 小幸运.

The speed of review has significantly increased, with results typically available within 1-2 months. Both the editors and reviewers are very responsible.

(0) 讚！ | YH0231

This journal is indexed in the EI source journal, but the retrieval report shows that it is indexed in the EI conference. The article type is CA, not JA. Have you encountered this situation before?

(0) 讚！ | 舟舟2019

This journal was originally listed in the EI source journal directory, but for some unknown reason it is now included in the EI conference proceedings. It's really strange.

(0) 讚！ | 舟舟2019

There are several reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | zlpupupu

Submitted on April 26th, received revision comments on May 21st. Two reviewers provided 10 suggestions, showing a careful and professional review. Three months were given for revisions, and the revised manuscript was sent back on June 10th. Minor revisions were received on June 25th, and the revised comments were sent back on July 1st. The outcome is unknown, but hopefully it will be accepted.

(0) 讚！ | Zero0

Brother, have you been hired?

(0) 讚！ | Da柚子

2022.12.5   accepted  Second review, article accepted for three months.

(0) 讚！ | Da柚子

My first review took three weeks to receive feedback, which required extensive revisions. I was given three months to make the changes, and after uploading the new system, it has been two months and it is still in the "Submitted" status. When I first submitted it, it was marked as "Under Review" in the afternoon, right after uploading it in the morning. I don't know how long it will take to reach the editor's hands...

(0) 讚！ | KEYAN

2022-01-16 Post, Article Type: Research Article
2022-02-22 First Review: Major revision, two reviewers, a total of 14 questions, given three months to make modifications
2022-04-22 First Review Returned
2022-08-03 Second Review: Minor revision, reviewer 2 raised three more questions, given three months to make modifications
2022-08-29 Second Review Returned
Waiting for the results, it will probably take a few more months.

In conclusion, the journal process is very slow, so it is not recommended to submit if you are in a hurry.

(0) 讚！ | Da柚子

It looks like the first trial will take 3 months, huh?

(0) 讚！ | 大开大海

In the first review, it is clear that the reviewer is very irresponsible and lacks expertise. The key issue is that the review process is extremely slow, taking half a year from submission to the second review. During this time, others in the same group have had their submissions accepted by other journals, while I have not received any news here. It can be said that it is very disappointing and the cost-effectiveness is very low. I do not recommend it at all. Don't expect any progress from them.

(0) 讚！ | 吉吉

I also plan to vote. How about you?

(0) 讚！ | 大开大海

This journal is really rare and extremely unpopular. There are a lot of special issues. I prepared to submit to the latest special issue. I will update it after submission.

(8) 讚！ | EMlsd