Please reply again, and in the end, you will be asked to submit the original file, just a regular Latex file. Make sure to clearly state in your reply that the paper has not been published elsewhere. Simply follow the instructions in the email.

(0) 讚！ | dfg666

Believe in yourself and don't give up, bro!!!

(0) 讚！ | dfg666

The final result is Accept.

(0) 讚！ | dfg666

I need to declare that this work has not been published in any journal. The editor did not ask me to check for plagiarism because it had already been done at the time of submission, so in the end I just made the declaration.

(0) 讚！ | dfg666

The image format I used for submission is .eps.

(0) 讚！ | dfg666

I submitted my article for review and it was rejected within one minute. The feedback did not mention the formatting, but rather stated that the theme of the article was slightly complicated for the journal. The editor of the journal has limited capacity and prefers to handle submissions that are more in line with the main theme. Is this a formatting issue?

(0) 讚！ | 那人 那风景

You can try submitting it first, as the formatting will be checked by AI after submission. It usually takes around 3 hours to complete the check. If it is rejected by the system, you can make the necessary changes based on the feedback provided.

(0) 讚！ | HuaNYing

I have more words, so I changed the font size of the references to 11. Is that okay?

(0) 讚！ | 那人 那风景

Yes, including references, it should not exceed 30 pages, otherwise it will be rejected, and the email of the corresponding author in the EM system needs to be a work email. I was rejected for these two reasons.

(0) 讚！ | HuaNYing

Is it necessary to limit the number of pages in Word to 30 pages? Is it necessary to use double spacing?

(0) 讚！ | 那人 那风景

I have been submitting my work for 10 months and still haven't received any response. It seems like the chief editor has been replaced. Who should I contact to follow up on my submission?

(0) 讚！ | zzk*

2025/3/1 submit
2025/4/25 major revision
2025/6/24 submit revision
2025/7/28 minor revision
2025/8/5 submit revision
2025/8/10 minor revision
2025/8/12 submit revision
2025/8/12 accept

(2) 讚！ | D.Luffy

2025/2/23 submit
2025/4/27 major revision
2025/5/29 submit revision
2025/6/21 minor revision
2025/7/2 submit revision
2025/8/6 minor revision
2025/8/9 submit revision
2025/8/9 accept

(0) 讚！ | 神射手（投就中）

Just submitted today, but it was returned for revision because the number of pages exceeded the limit.

(0) 讚！ | HuaNYing

Hello, is the submission format of this journal very important? I see it must be single-column and font size 12, do we have to follow these requirements?

(0) 讚！ | fuyu ZHANG

Master, I want to ask you, the chief editor said that we need to declare that the paper has not been published in any journal before. What materials do we need to submit for this? Do we need to check for plagiarism ourselves?

(0) 讚！ | 神射手（投就中）

Hello, may I ask what format is required for the images uploaded when submitting a contribution? Can it be in PNG format?

(0) 讚！ | 大胆去做

How are you doing now? My second review also changed from RRC to UR, I feel like I might not pass.

(0) 讚！ | Lucaa

I hope this journal will continue to improve, and I will definitely submit again in the future!

(0) 讚！ | dfg666

Latest news, by the end of July 2025, after two years and six months, the paper has finally been accepted.

(0) 讚！ | dfg666

Just wait, it's not even close yet. I waited for 2 years and 7 months to receive it, so just wait.

(0) 讚！ | dfg666

Brother, please wait patiently. We are far from reaching our destination.

(0) 讚！ | dfg666

Marathon-style submission process!
Submitted in January 2023,
Formally accepted in July 2025,
Lasted 2 years and 7 months, with 5 rounds of major revisions, 13 peer reviewers, and over a hundred review comments.
Objective evaluation:
(1) The journal is very good;
(2) The double-blind review system is very fair;
(3) The editors are very responsible;
(4) The comments from the reviewers are quite fair and reasonable;
(5) Before formal acceptance, it is necessary to delete the reference literature recommended by the reviewers. I would like to give you a five-star rating for this. Isn't this how academic work should be done!
Shortcomings:
Apart from being slow, there are no other shortcomings!
I will submit to this journal again next time, after all, it hasn't forgotten about my paper after two years.
Brothers with questions can leave comments below, I will reply when I see them.

(0) 讚！ | dfg666

5.16 submitted
5.19 under review
6.5 accepted for review

(0) 讚！ |

How many reviewers are you, and how many reviewers does this journal need at least?

(0) 讚！ | 十一月的海猫