Hello, may I ask if the editor explicitly mentioned the need to provide a plagiarism report during your last minor revision? This time, the editor only asked me to declare that there are no similar articles under review or published in other journals. Do I still need to provide a plagiarism report in this situation?

(0) 讚！ | drZL

The submission requirements are single-column, so please stick to single-column format. However, this is not the most important aspect. What is crucial is that the paper must be innovative.

(0) 讚！ | mathsxdg

Submitted in July 2024, received first review result in December 2024: major revisions; returned revised manuscript in January 2025, received second review result in March 2025: minor revisions, followed by two more rounds of minor revisions. Accepted on April 18, 2025. The journal has a very good processing speed, very efficient, editors are very good, very responsible, and every step is handled promptly. The journal is classified as a top journal in Zone 1, with double-blind peer review. Thank you to the reviewers, thank you to the editors.

(0) 讚！ | mathsxdg

Bro, the submission guidelines require a single column format, but all the published articles are in double column. Can I use a double column Latex template instead?

(0) 讚！ | alice_lcw

Same question, the submission guidelines require single columns, but all the publications are in double columns. Can I use double columns?

(0) 讚！ | alice_lcw

Could you please clarify whether the initial draft for submission to this journal is single-column or double-column format? I noticed that the author guidelines specify single-column format, but the latest published issues are all in double-column format.

(0) 讚！ | wei_xiao

Still in DIP.

(0) 讚！ | cjsnu

Is your editor Wang? Have they accepted it?

(0) 讚！ | 夏夏天天

Have you been hired?

(0) 讚！ | 夏夏天天

Yes, there should be differences of opinion.

(0) 讚！ | Alin

DIP 1 month

(0) 讚！ | cjsnu

From January 23rd to March 25th in the year 25,
a total of 26 months,
only received one round of feedback,
still Under review.
I am now in a dilemma,
not sure how to handle it,
it seems endless.
The review speed of this journal is highly uncertain,
and there are also many required reviewers.
For those who rely on it for graduation, it is advised to write another article for a different journal,
for those in a hurry to graduate, it is advised to submit cautiously!

(0) 讚！ | dfg666

Process the day after normal RRC.

(0) 讚！ | dfg666

Following my previous comment, the status has been updated to Required Reviews Completed. However, strangely enough, the status did not change to Decision in Process. The next day, the status changed back to Under Review. Can anyone explain the reason for this phenomenon?

(0) 讚！ | dfg666

Friendly reminder, for those who are in a hurry to graduate, please submit your work carefully!

(0) 讚！ | dfg666

I have written many reminders, but it's no use. I'm afraid that if I write too frequently, they will just reject it.

(0) 讚！ | dfg666

It has been more than ten days since the third review of the RRC, is this normal? How long will it take to process, the first and second reviews were quite fast before.

(0) 讚！ | 一定要中呀啊啊

May I ask where you looked up the information last? Did the uploaded files include a list of references?

(0) 讚！ | 小帅锅

I remember there were at least 4 reviewers, it's been such a long time, I suggest writing to the publisher or the editor of this journal for advice.

(0) 讚！ | 菠萝干abc

I had a similar situation, it took 20 months from application to acceptance, with the first review taking 15 months. It is necessary to contact the authors to email the editor-in-chief to get a response!! Good luck!!

(0) 讚！ | 神奇小狗

Do I need to bring references when applying for the job?

(0) 讚！ | 小帅锅

Hello, may I ask if the second corresponding author was indicated during the final proofreading?

(0) 讚！ | Daxianyu

The situation is similar, it has been 17 months already.

(0) 讚！ | 天空地海一体化

Everyone look at the speed of review themselves, I don't want to comment anymore, see for yourselves (Note: I did not make a mistake with the date, it started from January 2023)
January 8, 2023: Submitted to journal
June 27, 2024: Review complete
June 28, 2024: Decision in Process
June 29, 2024: Major Revision, 5 reviewer comments, 70+ review comments
January 3, 2025: Under review, sent a reminder to the editor
February 12, 2025: Sent another reminder to the editor
March 7, 2025: Still Under review, showing 6 reviewers, 3 of whom have not reviewed, must wait for all review comments before a decision is made.

(0) 讚！ | dfg666

The author guidelines and your submission interface should both emphasize that no changes to author information in any form will be accepted without special circumstances, and any modifications require approval from the editor-in-chief.

(0) 讚！ | 不想写论文的勾晴