It has been 40 days since the first draft was returned. How is everyone's progress? It has been 84 days since the submission, sob sob.

(0) 讚！ | wstw

Haha, the first review of 422 is back, 513 returns the manuscript, and 517 receives the letter that is about to be accepted!!! Thank you for your prayers, haha.

(0) 讚！ | 点点福星高照

No specific requirements, I have published a review article in my 23 years.

(0) 讚！ | 奋斗的虫子

Does anyone know the requirements for review articles in this journal? I just submitted mine and haven't received a response yet.

(0) 讚！ | 明月

I am also the reviewer for this, probably submitted around 3.24, but still no news yet.

(0) 讚！ | 纸忘2

The editor is Aaron Gross.

(0) 讚！ | Seven

I submitted the article on April 7, 2025, and have not received any news so far. What's going on?

(0) 讚！ | Seven

I also think that the cost-performance ratio is very high, but the speed of reviewing is not as fast as before. This may be related to the increase in the number of submissions by Chinese authors.

(0) 讚！ | 瑞光普照666

To update, Min-Hsiung Pan is responsible for editing, and he is meticulous and friendly. The submission will be sent for external review 3 days after submission. The review process is moderate in speed, and revisions are done quickly. Here is my timeline:

November 29, 2024 - Submission, sent for review on the 3rd day

March 4, 2025 - Reviewed by 2 reviewers, major revisions suggested, no additional experiments required

April 2, 2025 - Revisions made

April 10, 2025 - Minor revisions, formatting changes

May 4, 2025 - Revisions made

May 6, 2025 - Accepted

The reviewers and editor are very professional, the journal's speed is satisfactory, they do not follow the open access format, and do not charge any publication fees.

(1) 讚！ | 瑞光普照666

Superb, this magazine.

(0) 讚！ | 哈喽梅西

I have updated it. Editor-in-Chief Shengmin Sang is particularly good, quick in review and quick in revisions. Here is my timeline:
- February 14, 2025: Submission, reviewed the next day
- April 3, 2025: Reviewed by 4 reviewers, major revisions required, no additional experiments needed
- April 18, 2025: Revisions submitted
- May 1, 2025: Minor revisions, changed TOC format
- May 5, 2025: Revisions submitted
- May 6, 2025: Accepted
The reviewers are very professional, the journal is fast-paced, and if the quality of the manuscript is very poor, it will be rejected the next day. I am really happy and hope that JAFC will continue to improve.

(0) 讚！ | 哈喽梅西

Great magazine, very professional editing. External review was conducted for 3 months, with two major revision suggestions. The raised issues were detailed and sharp. After the revision meeting, the editor requested minor revisions within a week. The revised version was accepted directly, and the whole process from submission to online publication took a total of over 5 months.

(2) 讚！ | 瑞光普照666

Excuse me, is https://researcher-resources.acs.org/publish/ the old one? This website shows Associate Editor Assigned. But https://acs.manuscriptcentral.com/ shows UR, which one is correct?

(0) 讚！ | laofu

Is this new or old? This website shows Associate Editor Assigned.
https://acs.manuscriptcentral.com/
This one shows UR.

(0) 讚！ | laofu

Are you all submitting OA or non-OA articles?

(0) 讚！ | 研究僧

How do I see several reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | 独家爱与

My situation is the same. I have been waiting for almost a month for the new system to be submitted to the editor, while the old system is under external review.

(0) 讚！ | 独家爱与

One week, the editor has rejected.

(0) 讚！ | 小羊咩咩

25.02.26…..Submit
25.03.28……Major revision (2 reviewers + 1 missing)
25.04.03……Revision submit
25.04.14……Revision (1 more reviewer added + 2 previous reviewer accepted)
25.04.17……Revision submit
25.04.21……Just accepted (accept but need some technical revisions)
25.04.22……Revision submit
25.04.23……Acceptance + Sign agreement
25.04.24……Proof + proof comments submit

(0) 讚！ | maycam

Submission made on April 23rd, the editor-in-chief is Veronika Somoza. The new system shows "Under Consideration" while the other system shows "Under Review." Which system is correct?

(0) 讚！ | laofu

I have been waiting for nearly two months for the review, with five reviewers. Now it's time for revisions, and the outcome is unknown. It's probably best not to rush them.

(0) 讚！ | 哈喽梅西

May I ask if there is any news? I have also been waiting for three months and have not heard anything.

(0) 讚！ | ou泡果奶

How often do you receive the proofreading drafts?

(0) 讚！ | 渺小如NPs

Can you access the status on the old version? I am in the status of "UNDER REVIEW" on the old version.

(0) 讚！ | 独家爱与

Is the status seen in the old version accurate?

(0) 讚！ | 独家爱与