It was too slow, underwent peer review in early January and was completed on June 15th. There were two reviewers, one suggested adding more references, and the other raised formatting issues. In the end, it was rejected.

(1) 讚！ | 000710

The review process is really slow, it has been almost four months and it is still in the "under review" status. When I inquired via email, they said it was difficult to find reviewers. If you are in a hurry, it is better not to choose this option.

(0) 讚！ | Wucheng

Overall, the requirements are for comprehensive data, good reputation, and worthy of submission.

(0) 讚！ | 小波

You can send an email to the editorial department at appmc@wiley.com to inquire, they might not have submitted it for review yet.

(0) 讚！ | superceng

It has been over three months.

(0) 讚！ | daguan

It has been three months and nothing has changed.

(0) 讚！ | 000710

Hello, I would like to ask if there is a fee for this journal.

(0) 讚！ | wanxin.

Excuse me, is there a fee for this journal? After submitting my manuscript, I was not given the option to choose between OA and non-OA.

(0) 讚！ | wanxin.

The Vili system is like this, not necessarily.

(0) 讚！ | 郜霖一

It took a total of 81 days to finally be accepted.

(0) 讚！ | Yifan

Do all authors need to link their ORCID when submitting to this journal?

(0) 讚！ | KikiTZU

Is the new system UR for review? Just submitted and already UR, it has been over a month and still UR.

(0) 讚！ | 000710

The feedback has come back today.

(0) 讚！ | Donghang

When did you make the investment?

(0) 讚！ | 小波

Does anyone know the old system? Can you please share the old system of this journal? I want to check the progress, it has been 2 months.

(0) 讚！ | Donghang

Submission on September 25, 2025
Under review on September 28, 2025
Accepted on January 28, 2026

This is the first paper in my research career that was accepted after the first round of review. The review process took a long time, but the paper was accepted directly after review, with one reviewer having no comments and the other reviewer noting that the images were unclear. The reviewer suggested citing their own work, and the editor gave an immediate acceptance.

(1) 讚！ | DrewSeeley

Submission:
December 5, 2025
Final Revision Submitted:
January 27, 2026
Accepted:
February 3, 2026
The decision time is very long, it's hard to wait (over a month), probably because it takes a long time to find reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | 罗淏文

No.

(0) 讚！ | sssaiggg

Has your feedback result come out?

(0) 讚！ | BY毕业

9.30投
10.17 UR
Currently UR

(0) 讚！ | sssaiggg

Have you taken all the make-up exams? Have you completed all of them?

(0) 讚！ | 逐梦无惧

Sorry guys, posted in the wrong place, haha, good luck with your submissions.

(0) 讚！ | Mr.Black12138

On June 24th, STJ
On June 29th, Under Review
On July 15th, Major Revision (15%, 15%, 50%) - need to submit many experiments and apply for an extension
On August 17th, STJ, Under Review on the same day
On September 4th, Major Revision (2 accepted, 1 at 15%, the third reviewer had a significant change in perspective and raised 4 theoretical questions)
On September 7th, STJ
On September 9th, Accept
Thank you to the editors and all the reviewers, the first AFM, wishing the journal continued success~

(0) 讚！ | Mr.Black12138

This reviewer is indeed very authoritative, the experiments that need to be supplemented are particularly numerous and detailed, and we are currently making efforts to contact the instrument for testing.

(0) 讚！ | 清辰

7.28 resubmission, 8.9 Under Review with editor for a short period of time, 9.8 Revise with five reviewers, four of whom had language issues that were easily fixed, only one reviewer requested a large number of additional experiments, totaling over ten experiments. Why were so many additional experiments requested in the third round? We had already done a lot, and if we were to do all of the requested experiments, it would far exceed what is typically required in the first round.

(0) 讚！ | 清辰