Submission received. 10 May 2026
Submission is under technical check 10 May 2026
Amendment requested. 11 May 2026
Amendment received 13 May 2026

(0) 讚！ | 张三金

Hello, may I ask how long it will take for your article to be submitted for review? What is the progress like now?

(0) 讚！ | xxxx123,

Hello, I would like to ask how long it took for your article to be accepted.

(0) 讚！ | xxxx123,

Reviewers Assigned, does it mean that reviewers have been invited?

(0) 讚！ | sun

Do you need to upload the original WB image?

(0) 讚！ | Albert Morley

Submitted on June 3, 2024
Changed from "assign" to "under review" on June 4, 2024
Updated to "under review" on June 8, 2024
Have any seniors experienced this before? Is it delivery on June 4th or June 8th?

(0) 讚！ | Doctor Yang

Hello, may I ask if you have received it now?

(0) 讚！ | 幸运

Hello, may I ask how much is the layout fee?

(0) 讚！ | 幸运

Review Speed: 2.0 Experience sharing: Submitted a meta this year, originally rejected and didn't want to continue submitting, but it was accepted, very surprising

(0) 讚！ | 水芸公子

It has been two months since submission, after the first round of minor revisions and resubmission, it has been sent for review again. It seems that this journal generally requires two rounds of review, hoping for acceptance soon!

(0) 讚！ | 通幽寻芳

I want to ask, after my manuscript was reviewed by three reviewers in the first round and I made revisions according to their comments, it has now become "under review" again. Is the editor sending my revised manuscript back to the same reviewers for another round of review, or are they finding new reviewers to assess it? I'm confused

(0) 讚！ | 通幽寻芳

I also want to ask, why does it feel like I've been searching for two laps

(0) 讚！ | 通幽寻芳

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Sharing experience: The first review took nearly 2 months, with a request for additional experiments. The second review took over 5 months, and the third review took only 1 day. With the additional experiments in between, the whole process took about a year. Fortunately, the paper was finally accepted

(0) 讚！ | 水月曲文

How long have you been waiting for Reviewcomplete?

(0) 讚！ | 通幽寻芳

How is everything going?

(0) 讚！ | 通幽寻芳

Focused Research Direction: Sharing Experience from Meta-Analysis: Rejected Within a Month, Quickly Returned with Comments from Two Reviewers

(0) 讚！ | 炳硕姑娘

Heavy research direction: Sharing reproductive experiences: I would like to ask the predecessors, does "under review" mean that a reviewer has been found?

(0) 讚！ | 苍风泰河

How are you, have you received it?

(0) 讚！ | 长安丹蝶

The reviewer is quite professional. After one month of submission, the revised version was returned for further revisions. After another month, the language modifications were mostly accepted. The refined version was directly accepted. The magazine editor is very diligent and responsible, and the speed is relatively fast. Highly praised! I hope it will continue to improve.

(1) 讚！ | ky88818

Under review for 5 days and suddenly changed to review completed, my heart is anxious. Does this mean I have been rejected? Will it go back to under review again? Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | 问儿baby

Review speed: 2.0 Emphasis research direction: genetics; reproductive experience sharing: 1.5 Submitted, 2.8 under review, 4.5 major revision, 4.21 revised, 7.4 accepted, many different statuses in between, status dates updated quickly, journal processing is quite fast, if reviewers are fast, it will be even quicker

(0) 讚！ | 深渊永思

What is the process after acceptance? How long until it is online?

(0) 讚！ | 暴风东岭

Hello, do you know how many reviewers are usually sought?

(0) 讚！ | 深渊永思

The discussion section is the core part of a SCI paper, as it can reflect the breadth and depth of the author's research. Therefore, there is no specific word limit for this part. Different articles and authors may have varying lengths for the discussion section, ranging from a few thousand words to tens of thousands of words

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is "IF"?

(0) 讚！ | 北国博达