期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱![]() | JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS LetPub Score 7.7
52 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.6 Influence 6.8 Speed 7.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | J COMPUT APPL MATH | ||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0377-0427 | ||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 106 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 4.80%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-computational-and-applied-mathematics/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/ELSCAM | ||||||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Elsevier | ||||||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 数学 | ||||||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | NETHERLANDS | ||||||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 月2回刊行 | ||||||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 1975 | ||||||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 582每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 13.41% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0377-0427%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 3.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: About 75% | ||||||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: xxxhhhyyy 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-07 10:42:35 評論於 Yesterday, I sent another reminder letter, but the editor rejected it directly. It's also a good thing, at least I don't have to wait anymore, it's time to cut losses. ![]() ![]() |
作者: Richard Cheng 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 10.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-06 16:56:11 評論於 I also submitted my paper for review and waited for ten months before receiving the review comments. Finally, one reviewer provided direct feedback while another reviewer suggested acceptance with revisions. However, the editor-in-chief decided to reject the paper based on both reviewers' recommendations. ![]() ![]() |
作者: fjcyue007 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-02 18:18:13 評論於 If you are mentally prepared, go ahead and urge the manuscript. It is indeed easy to be rejected in the process of urging manuscript for this journal, mainly because the editor has the final say and can ignore the suggestions of the reviewers. ![]() ![]() |
作者: fjcyue007 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-02 18:16:25 評論於 I also took the risk of being rejected to rush for the submission at that time. It was indeed slow because one of the reviewers for the second review left midway and did not provide any feedback. I had to find another reviewer to review the manuscript. ![]() ![]() |
作者: xxxhhhyyy 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-28 19:43:31 評論於 I have already sent reminders four times, emails to the editorial department and the possible editor in charge of my manuscript, but I have not received any response. It has been 7 months and my manuscript is still under review, with no one accepting the review. It's too difficult. ![]() ![]() |
作者: zhenbo wang 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-18 14:31:50 評論於 The efficiency of Xiao Xiu is very high, so he was hired directly. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 认真科研 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-01 13:55:18 評論於 I have been in the second review status for over 4 months now, and I will not submit to this journal in the future, it's too slow. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 认真科研 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-01 13:50:56 評論於 I have been waiting for over 4 months for my second review, and I am still with the editor. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 认真科研 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-01 13:03:42 評論於 Have you received any results from this journal? It has been over 4 months since my second review, and I have not heard anything yet. I am considering urging them for a decision, but after seeing many others get rejected after doing so, I am too afraid to. It feels quite humiliating. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 认真科研 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-01 12:55:27 評論於 I have been waiting for over 4 months for the second review, but still haven't received any news. I am considering urging for a decision, but after seeing comments from many people who were rejected after urging, I am too afraid to do so. It's so humiliating. ![]() ![]() |
作者: nalan7001 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-01 09:02:59 評論於 After being in the "with editor" status for nearly three months, I requested a rejection, but instead it was sent for review. Out of the 6 reviewers contacted, only 1 was willing to review it. I feel like I've been taken for a ride, it's really slow. ![]() ![]() |
作者: fjcyue007 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-25 10:22:49 評論於 After urging repeatedly dozens of times, it was finally received... ![]() ![]() |
作者: 七七八八久久 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-17 08:02:26 評論於 True, but I also want to take it easy. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 鱼饼饼 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-15 16:41:39 評論於 How long have you been with the editor? ![]() ![]() |
作者: leo 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-13 08:54:21 評論於 Which email address did you send it to? I replied but didn't receive any response. ![]() ![]() |
作者: leo 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-09 09:01:20 評論於 Which email was used to send the reminder? There is no option to send emails to the editorial department in the submission system, only a "view submission" option. Please let me know, thank you. ![]() ![]() |
作者: leo 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-09 08:58:30 評論於 The official account only displays one review request, which was completed two months ago, but there is still no response. Can you please advise on how to follow up? I couldn't find an option to send an email to the editorial department in the submission system, there is only a "view submission" option. Thank you. ![]() ![]() |
作者: wfz1984 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-06 08:59:06 評論於 I guess the wait with the editor is a bit long... ![]() ![]() |
作者: fjcyue007 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-02 19:28:11 評論於 How did you follow up on the submission? How did you manage to not get rejected? ![]() ![]() |
作者: fjcyue007 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-02 19:27:27 評論於 How do you follow up on the submission? Do you send an email directly to the editor-in-chief's inbox? ![]() ![]() |
作者: qiong_ 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-11 09:31:41 評論於 How to follow the official account? I submitted a contribution, but the corresponding author is not me. ![]() ![]() |
作者: fjcyue007 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-25 23:27:04 評論於 The editor of this journal has the final decision-making power. Even if the reviewers suggest minor revisions, the editor may still reject the submission, especially if it requires significant changes. Additionally, the submission may remain in the hands of the editor for a long time. ![]() ![]() |
作者: lucky yukie 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-15 16:52:58 評論於 My focus is also on optimization. It has been a month with the editor and there hasn't been any response yet. I hope there is good news soon. ![]() ![]() |
作者: xxxhhhyyy 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-14 11:10:59 評論於 Submitted on 2025/01/22, Under review on the same day. The public account shows that the manuscript was sent to 2 reviewers, but so far none of them have accepted the invitation. The editor has not sent out any other review invitations either. Should I follow up on this or wait a little longer? I have done some optimization work, not sure of the outcome, hoping for a positive result~ ![]() ![]() |
作者: lidping 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-08 21:34:38 評論於 Requested once, rejected, but the reviewer's feedback seemed positive. Emphasized twice and asked for acceptance after revisions. ![]() ![]() |
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us