True, but I also want to take it easy.

(0) 讚！ | 七七八八久久

How long have you been with the editor?

(0) 讚！ | 鱼饼饼

Which email address did you send it to? I replied but didn't receive any response.

(0) 讚！ | leo

Which email was used to send the reminder? There is no option to send emails to the editorial department in the submission system, only a "view submission" option. Please let me know, thank you.

(0) 讚！ | leo

The official account only displays one review request, which was completed two months ago, but there is still no response. Can you please advise on how to follow up? I couldn't find an option to send an email to the editorial department in the submission system, there is only a "view submission" option. Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | leo

I guess the wait with the editor is a bit long...

(0) 讚！ | wfz1984

How did you follow up on the submission? How did you manage to not get rejected?

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007

How do you follow up on the submission? Do you send an email directly to the editor-in-chief's inbox?

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007

How to follow the official account? I submitted a contribution, but the corresponding author is not me.

(0) 讚！ | qiong_

The editor of this journal has the final decision-making power. Even if the reviewers suggest minor revisions, the editor may still reject the submission, especially if it requires significant changes. Additionally, the submission may remain in the hands of the editor for a long time.

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007

My focus is also on optimization. It has been a month with the editor and there hasn't been any response yet. I hope there is good news soon.

(0) 讚！ | lucky yukie

Submitted on 2025/01/22, Under review on the same day. The public account shows that the manuscript was sent to 2 reviewers, but so far none of them have accepted the invitation. The editor has not sent out any other review invitations either. Should I follow up on this or wait a little longer? I have done some optimization work, not sure of the outcome, hoping for a positive result~

(0) 讚！ | xxxhhhyyy

Requested once, rejected, but the reviewer's feedback seemed positive. Emphasized twice and asked for acceptance after revisions.

(0) 讚！ | lidping

It has been over a month since the review was completed and there has been no response. After prompting once, it was rejected, and the reviewer requested revisions for acceptance.

(0) 讚！ | lidping

This journal is just as slow as others upstairs have mentioned, and you can't reach the editorial department. The deadline editors never reply to your reminders, and the second review takes longer than the first review. Furthermore, if the reviewer exceeds the deadline, they can simply choose not to submit their review comments. The editor will then have to find someone else to review the article again. Proceed with caution when submitting.

(1) 讚！ | fjcyue007

Today is under review.

(0) 讚！ | AlbertBJ

Yesterday reminded no response.

(0) 讚！ | ie

With the chief editor, almost a month and a half.

(0) 讚！ | AlbertBJ

Hello experts, is it normal for "With Editor" to last for one and a half months?

(1) 讚！ | ie

Is it normal for it to take a month and a half with the editor?

(0) 讚！ | ie

This journal's first round of review is very quick, with reviewers completing their reviews in just 4 days. However, there are also cases where it takes over a month for the first round of review to be completed. The second round of review is surprisingly slow, with no response for two months. It is said that some reviewers take up to half a year to complete their second round of review... and it is also difficult to push for submission.

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007

After several reminders, it took about 6 months for the AE to return with feedback on the formatting changes. The revisions were completed and submitted for acceptance within a week.

(0) 讚！ | nothing、xxx

We have been in this state for nearly a month, so let's go online and see what's going on.

(0) 讚！ | Plum

The review speed is too slow!!!! Submitted in October 23, received first round of comments in June 24, with two reviewers (one accepted the revised version, the other requested comparison with other algorithms); Received second round of comments in July 24, second review ended by the end of September (status can be tracked on the public account, only sent to the second reviewer), directly rejected (the second reviewer gave the same comments as the first time, with an additional sentence: "I do not think the algorithm proposed by the author is faster than ** algorithm"); Sent an email to argue with the editor in early October 24, editor assigned another reviewer on the same day, still under review now; It has been 14 months, and the outcome is still unknown, the second reviewer is really irresponsible.

(1) 讚！ | chenzebin

The submission was made on June 9, 2024, and as of November 5, the status is: Required Reviews Complete, with invitations sent to 2 or more reviewers and 2 reviews received. It has now been over a month with no further updates.

(0) 讚！ | lidping