My second revision has been submitted for over a month now and it is still in "with Editor" status. Should I send an email to follow up?

(0) 讚！ | leo

How long did it take for yours to be reviewed in the end? Mine has also been a month.

(0) 讚！ | QQQS0318

Please record the following:

2026.03.04 submitted to Journal
2026.03.05 received by Editor
2026.03.07 received by Editor

(0) 讚！ | QQQS0318

Could you please confirm if the mid-way date for "received by editor" will change?

(0) 讚！ | QQQS0318

How long does it take to be hired after you submit your application, Xiao Xiu?

(0) 讚！ | Feng

More than nine hundred.

(0) 讚！ | 科研菜菜子

May I ask what number we are currently at?

(0) 讚！ | 心动贩卖机

3. 26 submitted to journal
4.02 received by editor

(0) 讚！ | 科研菜菜子

May I ask how long it will take for the submission to be reviewed?

(0) 讚！ | QQQS0318

One of the Top2, which one is the other?

(0) 讚！ | CUMTICLBL

Bro, have you received any feedback on the review comments?

(0) 讚！ | 杨玉祥

Submission on June 06, 2025
Acceptance on January 17, 2026
First review with 4 reviewers, 2 provided very positive feedback (expected minor revisions), 2 provided neutral feedback (expected major revisions), editor requested major revisions, deadline is three months;
Second review only received feedback from one reviewer, with only 1 issue identified, clearly a minor revision, deadline still three months, made personal revisions and submitted within 1 day.
Doing CFD, submitting to this was not bad.

(0) 讚！ | weich

Jul 21, 2025 Submission
Dec 09, 2025 Acceptance
It's a bit slow, but still within an acceptable range! By the way, based on the experiences of these submissions, the manuscripts that may be sent for review generally have "Received by Editor" status for about a month.

(0) 讚！ | 大T-Peachsea

This condition usually lasts for a month.

(0) 讚！ | 大T-Peachsea

How long does it take for the manuscript to be sent for review after being received by the editor? It's been almost a month for me.

(0) 讚！ | Feng

As of 2025.11.05, Reviews completed, the editor is awesome, JCP is awesome (the editor was reminded last week and received a response promising to handle it over the weekend, but in reality, no action was taken).

(0) 讚！ | 元气满满的小满

As of November 1, 2025, Reviews completed is still outstanding, it has been exactly one year, the editor is awesome, JCP is awesome.

(0) 讚！ | 元气满满的小满

As of November 1, 2025, Reviews completed is still going strong, it has been exactly one year, the editor is awesome, JCP is awesome too!

(0) 讚！ | 元气满满的小满

As of 10.27, Reviews completed are still pending. Even after sending an email to the deputy editor, there has been no response. This deputy editor is really amazing.

(0) 讚！ | 元气满满的小满

It has been over a month and it is still in the "received" status. I am about to explode.

(0) 讚！ | 小太阳

Trash journals deserve low impact factors. When encountering idiotic reviewers who accept the review but refuse to actually review it, both the first and second review are stuck with them. It has been almost a year since submission, and three weeks have passed since the completion of the second review, yet the idiotic editor seems to have disappeared. Stay away from this lightning rod of a trash journal.

(1) 讚！ | 元气满满的小满

Submitted on February 2nd, received the first revision after 4 months, spent one month revising (added 4 experiments and modified the way the article is introduced, totaling over 20 pages), returned the revised version after one month, with no further revisions, and was accepted directly. The questions raised hit the main points directly, leading to significant improvements after revisions and providing a direction for future research. However, it's unclear why our department does not consider it a top-tier journal.

(1) 讚！ | 虎子头曹冲

2024.12.23 submitted
2025.1.10 with editor
2025.1.12 with editor
2025.1.14 under review
2025.3.2 major revise
2025.3.10 submitted
2025.3.11 under review
2025.4.11 review complete
2025.4.14 minor revise
2025.4.14 submitted
2025.4.21 accept

The total submission time was exactly four months, with one and a half months given by the first associate editor for initial review. Three reviewers were assigned for the first review, but only two returned their feedback by the deadline, providing nearly 60 comments that greatly improved the quality of the article. Approximately 9,000 words were added in response to the reviewers' feedback. The second round of review allowed for one month.

(0) 讚！ | 温水煮青蛙

In the field of computational fluid dynamics, it is absolutely Top 1. Many famous algorithms have been published in this journal, and those who develop algorithms consider it an honor to publish a paper in this journal.

(0) 讚！ | 计算流体

Since the change of editor-in-chief last year, it has been impossible to select recommended editors. I submitted my manuscript in early September last year, received the first round of comments in November, revised in December, responded to another round of comments, and finally got accepted in March this year. It took about six months on average for this journal, but the publication process was quite fast, as it was published online in less than 10 days after acceptance.

(0) 讚！ | ANSLKF