Submission on February 13, 2025.
Received reviewer comments on July 7, 2025, with three reviewers - one minor revision and two major revisions, totaling 100 comments. One of the major revisions was more critical, questioning the idealistic design of the simulation conditions. Given four weeks to make revisions, but it was extended twice, totaling 8 weeks. Communication with the editor was smooth during this time, with emails usually being replied to the next day.
Major revisions were submitted on September 15, 2025, but the process has been stuck at Reviewer Selection. Despite sending several emails to the editor's personal and system email addresses, there has been no response. Even after copying Luping, there has been no reply, which is quite strange.

(0) 讚！ | david667

How long did everyone wait in the "under review" stage? It's been 2 months since the second round of major revisions under review, and it's been a total of 9 months overall...

(0) 讚！ | 远影小透明

Students typically do not have restrictions when graduating, as long as the research is considered to be scientific. However, this may not be the case for faculty positions.

(0) 讚！ | GuidCon

It depends on whether your unit differentiates between long and short articles, we do not make that distinction, but I have heard that some units do.

(0) 讚！ | houzinb

I would like to ask all the experts, is there any difference in retrieval between notes and full-length articles? Will it affect meeting the graduation requirements?

(0) 讚！ | 佐助

Hello, I also resubmitted my application as a note and have been under review for a month now. I have a situation similar to yours and would like to ask how things have been progressing for you. Thank you very much.

(0) 讚！ | Li0222

Have you ever experienced being stuck in the reviewer selection stage? My manuscript was with the editor-in-chief and associate editor for a week, and then it has been showing "reviewer selection" for two months before directly updating to "decline." What is going on?

(1) 讚！ | Cruz Zhang

Yes, it is a direct hire and there is no requirement for a second round of revisions.

(0) 讚！ | GuidCon

It has been 4 and a half months now and still no news. Have you returned to minor repairs after the major repairs on your end, or have you been directly hired?

(0) 讚！ | LQXnuaa123

Typically, major revisions make decisions quickly, usually within a month and without new reviewers. The chances of major revisions being accepted are still quite high, but I am not sure if the speed of the associate editor's processing plays a factor.

(0) 讚！ | GuidCon

After submitting the revised manuscript, how many months does it usually take to receive a decision? It has been over three months and there has been no response. Should I consider reaching out to other reviewers? Is there a higher chance of acceptance after a major revision?

(0) 讚！ | LQXnuaa123

After receiving the feedback on major revisions, it usually takes a few months to get the results. It has been over 3 months and there has been no news yet. Should we look for other reviewers? Is the chance of acceptance higher after major revisions?

(0) 讚！ | LQXnuaa123

After submitting the revised manuscript, it generally takes a few months to receive the decision. It has been over 3 months and there has been no response yet. Should I look for other reviewers? Is the chance of acceptance higher after revising the manuscript?

(1) 讚！ | LQXnuaa123

The other three are all younger brothers in front of JGCD, the youngest among them.

(2) 讚！ | 面面

How should JGCD, TAES, AST, and CJA choose funds/hats/selections in the field of aerospace control?

(0) 讚！ | 小白菜111

Borrowing a comment from a senior in the TSP community, I personally believe that the value of academic achievements depends on whether they have significance: there are roughly four measures of the value of a paper, soundness, novelty, significance, and presentation. Soundness refers to the completeness and correctness of the technology (the absence of technical errors and defects is a prerequisite), novelty refers to whether the technical method is new or not (whether it is existing; existing technical processing methods that can be found in the literature are definitely not very effective), and significance refers to how much practical value it has ("Okay, I admit what you said is all correct, but tell me, what's the use of your method?"). Therefore, the innovation of stacking buffs is not called innovation (at most it is called sound). Having many formulas, over a hundred, is also not considered innovation (at most it is called sound). It may be sound and novel, but if it does not provide guidance value to the field, it lacks significance.

(0) 讚！ | GuidCon

Especially in recent years, there have been very few control-related articles, mainly because the field of control has been flooded with poorly-written papers that are filled with incomprehensible proofs, pretending to showcase theoretical depth but are actually academic garbage. The core criteria of this journal are: 1) originality of ideas, and 2) practical and significant technological innovations. If you are just piecing together theories for simulation without any practical application, you might as well not bother submitting your work here.

(0) 讚！ | 面面

Undoubtedly a top journal in the field, highly recognized in the aerospace industry, there is no one like it.

The entire acceptance process was neither fast nor slow. The paper was submitted in early February, the first round of comments was received in mid to late May, revisions were made in early June, and acceptance came in early July.

The editors were very meticulous and responsible. There were over 60 combined comments from the DE and AE, and the reviewers' comments were very professional, making you feel like, "Wow, I really didn't notice this detail before," which was very helpful in finalizing the paper.

(7) 讚！ | 面面

Constructive criticism, incremental innovation, and patchwork monsters are better avoided. Don't embarrass yourself by submitting to this journal

(0) 讚！ | 小年哥哥

Is there a difference between uppercase and lowercase when writing "under review"?

(0) 讚！ | 金色年华

What is the difference between "Under Review" and "under review"?

(0) 讚！ | 金色年华

Hello, may I ask why it has been about a week since I submitted my article, and the system shows "under review", but the Associate Editor is still "Not Assigned"?

(5) 讚！ | Kafka_

Who should I send the reminder to? I don't have the AE's email. The contact email sent when submitting the manuscript is the AIAA Publisher's email. It has been 12 months without a result after review, and no one replied to two reminders

(0) 讚！ | 对景难排

The huge problem caused by this is that many control-related articles, and corresponding stability proofs, are incorrect. Not to mention the novelty of your article, it's all nonsense. Basic stability cannot be guaranteed, let alone innovation

(0) 讚！ | cillian

Hello, I would like to ask, how do you define "good ideas," incremental innovation, and integration innovation? Could you provide an example?

(0) 讚！ | 星踪