| 期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING LetPub Score 8.1
53 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.3 Influence 7.4 Speed 7.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 期刊簡稱 | J INTELL MANUF | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 0956-5515 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| E-ISSN | 1572-8145 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| h-index | 67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 自引率 (2023-2024) | 13.60%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 官方網站 | https://link.springer.com/journal/10845 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/jims | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版商 | Springer US | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 主題領域 | 工程技术 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版國/地區 | NETHERLANDS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 發行頻率 | 隔月刊行 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 創刊年 | 1990 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 每年文章數 | 208每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 黃金OA百分比 | 29.36% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0956-5515%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 3.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: Easy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| *所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
| [JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
| 作者: Wang hanwen 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-10-07 11:08:54 評論於 2026/9/29 submitted 2026/10/1 editor assigned 2026/10/2 editor invited 2026/10/6 under review |
| 作者: Cfamine 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-09-20 19:58:17 評論於 Share the submission experience, the review process was quite fast. Reviewers invited Invitations sent on September 19, 2026 Editor invited On September 18, 2026 Editor assigned On September 16, 2026 First submitted to Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing On September 15, 2026 |
| 作者: tangtang. 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-09-17 22:12:29 評論於 The editor has been invited for nearly a month. How long have the rest of you been invited for? |
| 作者: WangJR99 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-09-14 14:19:23 評論於 8.11 submit 9.13 major revision |
| 作者: God9 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-09-12 23:23:25 評論於 What is your rate of repetition? What do you use for plagiarism detection? |
| 作者: Polarism 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-09-07 11:33:47 評論於 4.29 submit 6.8 major revision, reviewed by 5 reviewers 7.10 revision submitted 7.20 under review 8.11 minor revision, reviewed by 1 reviewer 8.14 revision submitted 8.31 Accept for final editing 9.5 Accept |
| 作者: tangtang. 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-09-04 17:05:19 評論於 Hey guys, how did it go in the end? I was also invited as an editor all along. |
| 作者: forest1234 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-29 09:53:23 評論於 The article was submitted at the end of March and underwent a major revision. It has been constantly requested to lower the repetition rate. Initially, it was reduced to 10%, but the editor asked for it to be lowered three to four times more. After lowering it to 6%, it was deemed acceptable after a minor revision. However, when resubmitted, it was again deemed to have a high repetition rate. The editor gave one final opportunity for modification. It is really frustrating. |
| 作者: 热心市民田某 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-27 10:22:38 評論於 Are you using Turnitin from the company Turnitin, or iThenticate from the same company? The two databases are different. |
| 作者: 整点薯条 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-25 22:07:59 評論於 Finally, it should be reduced to 5%, and individual articles with a similarity score of over 3% will not be accepted for publication. Turnitin will be used for plagiarism check. |
| 作者: 热心市民田某 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-23 11:08:24 評論於 "20 is not high either. Are you using Crossref or iThenticate? Is the similarity score high for individual articles, are there any repeated sentences?" |
| 作者: Alian666 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-23 09:32:26 評論於 20% |
| 作者: Polarism 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-22 14:57:15 評論於 Can you please check and let me know the approximate percentage of duplication in this text? |
| 作者: Alian666 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-21 14:18:11 評論於 Edited without submitting for approval. |
| 作者: Polarism 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-21 14:03:17 評論於 Are all the reviewers already approved the edits suggested by the editor? |
| 作者: Alian666 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-21 09:03:14 評論於 After the overhaul, I was asked to reduce weight. How did everyone manage to do that? |
| 作者: zhaoyushi 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-10 23:01:38 評論於 Brother, did you receive it? How much did it finally drop to? What tool did you use to check? |
| 作者: zhaoyushi 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-10 23:00:44 評論於 Please advise me, I used the Turnitin software to check my references and found a 10% similarity rate. Does this mean I have plagiarized, or am I in the clear? |
| 作者: forest1234 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-22 16:14:32 評論於 +1, after lowering it to 15% by yourself, the editing requirements need to be reduced by three to four times. |
| 作者: Robinhood 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-18 12:56:43 評論於 May I ask how low did it finally drop to? I was also rejected for the issue of repetition rate after major repairs, I checked it myself and it was 13. |
| 作者: 呱叽叽哇 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-16 08:42:16 評論於 After my major overhaul and rework, I checked my own plagiarism rate and found it to be 11%. However, I was still rejected due to the high plagiarism rate. |
| 作者: 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-30 18:12:07 評論於 Hello, I lowered it to 12%, but it was still criticized for high similarity and then rejected. |
| 作者: 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-30 18:10:26 評論於 I am also like this, I don't know what's going on. |
| 作者: lililihhh 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 直接被接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-30 11:42:04 評論於 The status is under review. |
| 作者: 整点薯条 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-24 16:12:48 評論於 May I ask which website you use for plagiarism checking? Can Turnitin be used for this purpose? |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
Contact us