Hello, I would like to ask if "With editor" includes the process of editors finding reviewers and reviewers reviewing the manuscript, or if it simply means the editor reviewing the article again? If it is the second option, what would the status be when finding reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | Gongcehnghao

The submission process took about 4 months, with one round of revisions. The first and second reviews each took around 45 days:

2024.12.03 submitted
2024.12.03 With Ad
2024.12.09 With Editor
2024.12.24 Out of review
2025.02.08 Decision Pending
2025.02.08 Revision Required
2025.02.12 Revised Manuscript Submitted
2025.02.12 With Journal Administrator
2025.02.15 With Editor
2025.02.16 Out of review
2025.03.26 Accept

(0) 讚！ | 绚丽青春科研人

I was with the journal adm on October 20th, and then with the editor until December 11th

(0) 讚！ | yin2525

Has the progress changed? I have been submitting with the journal Administrator.

(0) 讚！ | swssw

Hello, may I ask why the status of this journal is different from others? I have submitted my article, but it has been in the "with journal administrator" status for a while.

(2) 讚！ | 杰出青

How long does it usually take for the journal administrator to respond after submission? I haven't heard anything for the past two weeks.

(0) 讚！ | ak45457

Accepted on 22.8.26, it has been over three months now and I have not received any notification regarding the school manuscript. Has anyone else experienced this situation?

(0) 讚！ | 景仰

How long does it usually take with the journal administrator? It has been a week already, and there is still no news.

(0) 讚！ | suzhikun

Hello, may I ask how long it takes for the changes to occur after you submit your manuscript with the journal administrator?

(0) 讚！ | guang2018

Hello! Is your submission website the latest Taylor & Francis system? I have been in contact with the journal administrator after submitting my manuscript. What should I do now?

(0) 讚！ | jiho

Hello! Is your submission website the latest Taylor & Francis system? I have been in contact with the Journal Administrator after submitting my manuscript. What should I do next?

(0) 讚！ | jiho

Hello, may I ask why the status of this journal is different from others? I have submitted my manuscript, but it has been stuck on the "With Journal Administrator" status.

(0) 讚！ | mengxianm

2021-07-06 Submission
2021-09-14 First review comments returned
2021-09-28 First revision submitted
2021-10-22 Second review comments returned
2021-10-25 Second revision submitted
2021-10-30 Accepted
The overall speed of the journal is quite fast, taking less than four months for the first and second reviews. Moreover, the reviewers' comments are very pertinent, considering various issues. As long as the paper has complete content and sufficient experiments, it is worth trying to submit.

(0) 讚！ | Tian_破晓

Hello, do you have a template for the Journal of Modern Optics? The one in Word format, thank you.

(0) 讚！ | ludibngyi

The first SCI paper was submitted in March, and after revisions, it was accepted. Overall, it is considered quite good.

(0) 讚！ | Yoga Lin

Accepting minor repairs returned in May after submission in April 2021.

(0) 讚！ | xubi

Reply to the review comments after 2 months, minor revisions. After the modifications, it is accepted. Submission recommended.

(0) 讚！ | Fang Zhou

submitted on 20.11.17
Received a reply in about one month, minor revisions
Accepted after revisions
Recommended for submission

(0) 讚！ | Fang Zhou

Overall, the requirements for innovation were not very high, the experiment was sufficient, the article was written and checked, and there should be no repetition with previous own papers. The first review lasted about four months, the second review lasted about three months, and it took about half a month from acceptance to publication. I feel the speed is not fast, those who are in a hurry should submit carefully.

(2) 讚！ | guang2018

Previously, one article later selectd OEPLASMONIC was rejected, and then simply selectd to optik. After waiting for three months, there was no movement, so the submission was submitted in 2015.11.20, and 12.1 received the reviewer's comments (not to be reviewed by the reviewer after the revision), 12.10Back, the next day showed under review, hit Christmas, until the 1.10 status is still under review, my heart, ask the tutor whether to remind, the instructor thinks that there is another reviewer, so there is no control, 1.28 nightReceived by mail.

(1) 讚！ | lbx

is submitted in September, and the results of the review are published in November.The first time I selectd for SCI, I feel very lucky. It's a good journal. I don't need a page fee. I only scan the copyright agreement. I don't know if I want to mail the copyright agreement.

(1) 讚！ | ckghostwj@126.com

First trial for nearly 2 months; revised draft for one month, the speed can also accept irrigation journal ~

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

13.6.5Submission 8.21 first-instance opinion overhaul on oneThe reviewer's comments raised two questions about the stability of the system and the scope of the measurement. The other reviewer did not comment on the editor and made the overhaul 9.25 to release the revised draft. 11.8 Directly received

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I applied an image processing application, selectd directly rejected, reviewerFrom the four aspects of Significance:, Scientific Validity, Scientific Contribution, and Overall Presentation, the overall explanation was given, but no specific review comments were given.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/jmo

(0) 讚！ | 匿名