Submitted on January 15th, reviewed three days later;
Received feedback on February 12th, major revisions;
Submitted revised draft on February 22nd, reviewed two days later;
Received feedback on March 6th, one review comment, minor revisions;
Submitted revised draft on March 7th, accepted the same day.
The editor handled the manuscript quickly.

(0) 讚！ | taoboran

2024.11.26 submitted
2025.1.3 under review (feels like the editor may be on vacation, took a long time to submit)
2025.1.27 minor revise
2025.2.8 Revision Submitted

The nuclear materials should be considered a journal with high industry recognition, but unfortunately its impact factor has been gradually decreasing in recent years.

(0) 讚！ | little居

Hello, the editor asked me to separate the results and discussion sections into two parts. After I organized them, he sent it back and asked me to further divide it into two parts. What does this mean? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 小朱想读博

Any journal that stays at "with editor" for one or two weeks usually means it will be rejected.

(0) 讚！ | Little

Two reviewers reviewed the manuscript, with feedback returned on November 3rd and the editor rejecting it. The reviewers were very professional, with Zinkle suggesting that the changes are substantial and recommending that the manuscript be revised and resubmitted as a new version.

(0) 讚！ | 中谷

Submitted in early August 2024
Increased to 8 reviewers on September 17th.

(0) 讚！ | 中谷

The two review comments have both come back.
The two reviewers both requested revisions, but the editor rejected them.
Appeal.
Still rejected.
Submit to another journal....

(0) 讚！ | 亮晶晶圈外女友

It's already September, and I really don't know what happened to the second reviewer. I submitted the paper in February, received feedback from the first reviewer in May, but the second reviewer still hasn't responded in August. The editor has assigned another reviewer, but the paper has not been reviewed yet. It's too slow, I will go and remind the editor.

(0) 讚！ | 大懒猫

2024.8.2 Start submission
2024.8.6 Editing feedback for article format modification (changed from four parts to five parts)
2024.8.12 Submit for review
2024.8.13 Invite 4 reviewers, two accept

(0) 讚！ | 亮晶晶圈外女友

It's been 5 months, invited 2 reviewers, one of them finished reviewing in May 2024, I think the other reviewer may have forgotten... I'm going to send an email to ask about the situation.

(0) 讚！ | 大懒猫

2024.6.22 submitted, results unknown
2024.7.15 sent to two reviewers
2024.7.20 first reviewer accepted the review
2024.7.28 editor added an additional reviewer invitation
2024.8.13 editor continued to add another reviewer invitation
2024.8.14 first reviewer completed the review
2024.8.15 editor added another reviewer invitation
2024.9.18 editor added another reviewer invitation
2024.10.12 editor added another reviewer invitation
2024.10.31 second reviewer completed the review
2024.11.03 major revision

(1) 讚！ | TT

On the morning of April 24, 2024, two reviewers were invited, one accepted the review; in the afternoon, the second reviewer accepted the review. Overall, this is due to too many squeezed manuscripts and too slow editing submission speeds

(0) 讚！ | 大懒猫

I applied a month ago and haven't heard anything yet. My junior applied three months ago and got rejected

(0) 讚！ | 大懒猫

24.01.28 submitted to journal

(0) 讚！ | bbbbb

I'm dying of laughter. Your boss really dares to say that, and you actually believe him. You can't even touch a strand of hair from this journal CNS. It's hilarious.

(0) 讚！ | 012456

Mine is too, what does it look like now?

(0) 讚！ | C

I heard that nuclear materials will be strictly reviewed in the future to enhance the influence of journals, so it is unlikely to continue with excessive publishing. I hope it can return to its previous peak moments and also improve its impact factor.

(0) 讚！ | Fight领域顶刊

Although it is theoretically a top journal in the field of nuclear materials, the quality of the work published in it is quite inconsistent. I have read excellent articles that are on par with other top journals, as well as some poorly written articles that make me doubt the author's qualifications. However, regardless of that, I am the one who knows best about the quality of my own research. I can confidently say that I have done my best in the recent work that has been accepted by JNM.

(1) 讚！ | Automata

Did you get any results?

(1) 讚！ | 小竹子樱

After three or four days of submission, it changed to "decision in process." However, "decision in process" remained for ten days without any changes. What is the situation?
If it is a rejection, why haven't they provided any information after ten days? If it is not a rejection, then what have they been doing for these ten days?

(0) 讚！ | 568

The reviewing speed is very fast, and the editor directly gave a rejection after reading it.

(5) 讚！ | QS

I am a second-year PhD student. I had two successful submissions in the past six months, both of which took about two and a half months for acceptance, followed by a month and a half for peer review and around 20 days for revisions before final acceptance. Overall, the quality is acceptable, and it has a significant influence in the field of nuclear science and technology. However, it is considered average in the field of materials science. Nevertheless, if I plan to pursue a career in nuclear science and technology, it is still cost-effective to submit to this journal when applying to universities or research institutes. After all, professionals in the field still recognize this journal. The overall difficulty is around 7.5 out of 10. It requires a certain level of innovation, good data, and in-depth theoretical analysis. I recently submitted another paper to this journal and feel that it is still well-managed.

(27) 讚！ | Doctor. Ma

The first submission went smoothly, mainly because it needed to have innovative points. I received more submissions in the past two months, and the journal is quite good in the field of nuclear power. There is still no news about the second submission. I hope to have one accepted soon. I wonder if anyone has been submitting articles quickly recently.

(0) 讚！ | Fight领域顶刊

Your teacher is quite strict. This pie is also too big. There is no necessary connection between this journal and CNS. The gap is too big, big, big.

(0) 讚！ | 大雪坪

A small genius, brought to fulfill graduation requirements. First manuscript uploaded on November 2nd. Feedback received on December 23rd, with a total of 21 major and minor revisions. The reviewer was extremely meticulous, causing both love and hate towards him. Returned on February 9th; submitted for review on February 19th, and status changed to "under review." Received acceptance email on February 25th. Many thanks, as perseverance pays off.

(5) 讚！ | 铁臂阿佳佳