We suggest dividing the discussion of research limitations into three parts: (1) identifying research limitations; (2) explaining research limitations in detail; and (3) proposing future research directions or improvements. By discussing research limitations in this order, you can clearly highlight the shortcomings of the study without compromising its quality and validity

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

It is still necessary for us to clearly specify the limitations of the research in the paper, and explain how these limitations affect the conclusions of the paper. This helps reviewers and other readers understand that we have fully considered the limitations of the study. Discussing the limitations of the research work in the discussion section typically enhances the credibility of the article. Thinking about how to overcome these limitations in future research can have a positive impact

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to write about the limitations of a discussion?

(0) 讚！ | 修然小公主

Is it necessary to explain the limitations of the article in the discussion?

(0) 讚！ | 破戒阳平

Would it affect the review if the author does not fill in the confirmation email?

(0) 讚！ | Baron Jonah

Will it affect the review if the author does not fill in the confirmation email?

(0) 讚！ | Baron Jonah

Does the author's failure to fill in the confirmation email affect the review process?

(0) 讚！ | Baron Jonah

Would it affect the review process if the author does not fill in the confirmation email?

(0) 讚！ | Baron Jonah

Will it affect the review if the author does not fill in the confirmation email?

(0) 讚！ | Baron Jonah

Will it affect the review if the author's confirmation email is not filled in?

(0) 讚！ | Baron Jonah

Thank you

(0) 讚！ | 神古爱梅

How much is the review fee?

(0) 讚！ | 神古爱梅

Lan Er 2020-01-02 00:00:00 posted: A letter can be considered as an article, how many cases have you reported?

(0) 讚！ | Benjamin Guy

The letter is considered a dissertation. How many cases did you report?

(0) 讚！ | 震雷困顿

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission success rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: Submitted a case report as a letter. The first review took 5 months with minor revisions requested. After completing the revisions and resubmitting, it was accepted 3 weeks later

(0) 讚！ | Benjamin Guy

The wait is too long

(0) 讚！ | Oliver Jerry

The feedback on revision suggests that only one cell strain was used, which took three months, and an experiment using two additional cell strains was conducted as requested. However, after two months of review, it was rejected. The reason given was that the submission rate was only 25%. How could you reject me at the first review?!

(0) 讚！ | 灵犀秋阳

So-so, as long as I can graduate, my senior brother published an article last year, it can also be considered a successful graduation, then everything will be fine

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review Speed: 3.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 25.0 
Experience Sharing: This journal has a relatively slow review process. It took about three months for the first review to provide comments and major revisions. It also took several weeks after the revisions to receive a rejection notice. Consulting with senior colleagues who have previously submitted to the journal, they also experienced a long review period

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: The laboratory has submitted five papers in the past five years, but only one has been accepted. The papers that were not accepted were all submitted to journals with an impact factor of 2.58 or similar, and they were all accepted. Personally, I feel that JPHO values the direction of submission very much. If the content of the article meets its requirements, it is more likely to be accepted. Now I have just submitted one article and hope to receive good news soon

(0) 讚！ | Isabel Raman

Research focus: Pediatrics

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Research Focus: Pediatrics

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁