7.10 First reviewer begins review
7.12 Sent to reviewer
7.14 First reviewer begins review
8.2 Review report has been delivered
8.7 Sent to reviewer
8.12 First reviewer begins review
8.26 Review report has been delivered
9.5 Manuscript revision
9.19 Manuscript revision: Sent to reviewer
10.10 Manuscript revision
10.10 Manuscript revision: Sent to reviewer
10.12 Manuscript revision: Review report has been delivered
10.12 Manuscript pre-accepted

The above is the status of the manuscript queried on the public account. It seems that after each reviewer completes the review, the status will be reverted from the first reviewer's review back to sent to the reviewer.
The reviewers' questions were quite professional. The manuscript was reviewed by three people, with the first two reviewers recommending revisions or rejection, and the third reviewer suggesting revisions. The editor ultimately requested major revisions. The manuscript was accepted after the first round of revisions.

(0) 讚！ | 加索

The paper has been submitted for review. Updates will be provided once the review process is complete.

(1) 讚！ | wangjjjjjpppp

Why is the tracking submission ID invalid? I could clearly check it before.

(0) 讚！ | 孤客

I am too. It has been half a month since submission, and it has been in the "manuscript received" status all along. I don't know what's going on. What happened to the original poster later?

(0) 讚！ | 小随

Do you know any scholars familiar with this journal? I have been waiting for nearly a month and it is still in "Manuscript Received" status. What's going on? Isn't it usually supposed to take around six days for the first decision to be made?

(0) 讚！ | Yangzhi

How much is the journal layout fee?

(0) 讚！ | 平常心最怕平常中停歇

Quantum optics theory, the review process is fast. I think some of the papers above are still good. I don't understand why the impact factor is so low, and the partition is also poor.

(0) 讚！ | xiaohuo666

The research team has submitted 5 articles in the journal, and only two have been accepted. There is a high requirement for the innovation of the article, and the reviewers are very meticulous, and the quality of articles is not bad. It is difficult to understand why the impact factor does not rise.

(2) 讚！ | 逐梦远航

I think the review speed was more slowly. It was probably linked to being unable to find reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | rvoice

Old-fashioned journals, why the impact factor does not go up.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

JPB is a very good journal. The review process is relatively fast. The reviewer is very serious and takes about a month to send comments. Generally, it is about five months from the time of submission and acceptance.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

IOP own journal, which belongs to the influential journal in the physics category. The average quality of the article is good and the variance is slightly larger.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名