The review comments have not returned as of 12.30, and now it's been WE again.

(0) 讚！ | 求接收

11.20 in peer review 
12.15 still in peer review

(0) 讚！ | 求接收

2025.11.30 accept
2025.12.01 license to publish

(0) 讚！ | 敏

Journal with a fast processing speed.

(0) 讚！ | Ricardo

2025.11.27 in peer review
I am very frustrated. The first review was positive, with both reviewers giving favorable comments. How come it's been 10 days since the revisions were submitted and there is still no result? Isn't it supposed to be a quick process to get results after a glance?

(0) 讚！ | 敏

November 19, 2025 in peer review.

(0) 讚！ | 敏

11.11投
11.11 WE
11.18 still WE

(0) 讚！ | 求接收

2025.11.12 major revision
2025.11.18 with editor (revised)

(0) 讚！ | 敏

The submission guidelines mentioned that it is not necessary to follow the template for formatting, and strict requirements on format will not be imposed during the submission period.

(0) 讚！ | 敏

May I ask if this journal has a submission template available?

(0) 讚！ | 你好

2025.11.03 review complete
However, the status of the article has changed from "with editor" back to "in peer review." What's going on? Are the review comments inconsistent, prompting the need for another reviewer?

(0) 讚！ | 敏

October 24, 2025 in peer review

(0) 讚！ | 敏

October 22, 2025 with editor. It's strange how it ended up back in the hands of the editor again. Are there no suitable reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | 敏

Submitted on October 16, 2025
In peer review on October 19, 2025

(0) 讚！ | 敏

250706 Major revision. There was a 50-day gap between submissions because one of the reviewers did not accept the manuscript in the first round, and we had to find a new reviewer. Currently, all three reviewers have rated the significance of the paper as high. They have recommended major revisions and additional experiments to be done.

(0) 讚！ | 给个大修就行

Submitted on 5.15, peer review on 5.17, the efficiency of sending out for review is still high, hoping to be accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 给个大修就行

12.1 submit
12.4 with editor
12.6 in peer review
1.23 minor revision
1.28 submit
2.1 with editor
2.3 in peer review
2.10 accept
2.12 Licence to Publish
2.13 proof

(0) 讚！ | 努力搬砖

How long after you accept do you receive the proof?

(0) 讚！ | 大聪明～～

How long does it take to download articles and retrieve them from WOS online?

(0) 讚！ | yuxie

Now the tide is rising, and all three periodicals emphasize innovation. One minor revision and one rejection, they rejected me, frustrating.

(0) 讚！ | 大聪明～～

Submission: 19-Dec-2023
First Review: 10-Jan-2024 (Major Revision)
Revised Review: 02-Feb-2024
Acceptance: 04-Feb-2024

(0) 讚！ | Annita欣

Submission: 25/12/2023
Revision: 23/1/2024
Resubmission: 5/2/2024
Acceptance: 18/2/2024

(5) 讚！ | 万物有灵LSLS

Submitted on 2024.01.02
Revised on 2024.01.18
Revised again on 2024.01.26
Accepted on 2024.02.06

(26) 讚！ | 欢rrrrrr

24/1/24 submit
24/1/26 Initial assessment
24/1/28 with editor
24/1/29 in peer review
24/2/21 major revision, both reviewers gave the evaluation of: Rate - significance: High: results provide valuable insights and advances the field – suitable for Analyst
24/3/10 revision submitted
24/3/17 accepted

(4) 讚！ | 一颗老榴莲

RSC Analytical Chemistry is a classic journal, but I'm not sure why it has dropped to Q3. It seems to have higher recognition than many current Q2 analytical chemistry journals

(67) 讚！ | 科研搬砖民工