| 期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | Analytica Chimica Acta LetPub Score 8.4
59 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.6 Influence 7.9 Speed 8.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 期刊簡稱 | ANAL CHIM ACTA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 0003-2670 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| E-ISSN | 1873-4324 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| h-index | 180 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 自引率 (2023-2024) | 5.30%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 官方網站 | https://www.journals.elsevier.com/analytica-chimica-acta | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/ANALYTICA-CHIMICA-ACTA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版商 | Elsevier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 主題領域 | 化学 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版國/地區 | NETHERLANDS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 發行頻率 | 週刊 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 創刊年 | 1947 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 每年文章數 | 1023每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 黃金OA百分比 | 10.39% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0003-2670%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 3.1 month(s) 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 5.9 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: 75% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 在線文章發布時間 | 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 5.6 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| *所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
| [Analytica Chimica Acta] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
| 作者: ETttt 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-30 13:02:58 評論於 Submitted on January 26th, reviewed on the 27th, due to the Chinese New Year one of the reviewers went missing, the editor had to invite a new group of reviewers during the New Year break, returned for revision on February 26th, given 21 days, returned for revision on March 11th, accepted on March 17th, the fastest turnaround in my submission career! Hope ACA gets better and better. |
| 作者: kishi 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-27 15:06:39 評論於 Yes, how long will it take for delivery? |
| 作者: 于鱼鱼 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-11 14:13:48 評論於 This magazine appearing as "under review" means it has been sent for external review, right? |
| 作者: 鸭子死了 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-01 10:37:59 評論於 Submitted on January 8, 2026, revised on January 24, 2026 - major revision (one minor revision and one major revision), resubmitted on February 6, 2026, second review on February 16, 2026 - accepted after minor revision (one acceptance and one minor revision), final version submitted on February 19, 2026, typesetting completed on February 27, 2026. |
| 作者: 子华今天发paper了吗 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-01-22 17:12:47 評論於 Submission on November 15, 2025, major revisions on December 16, 2025, revised on January 2, 2026, and accepted on January 17, 2026. |
| 作者: :( 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-12-01 23:22:59 評論於 Could I please ask what the outcome was after your first dip review? |
| 作者: :( 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-12-01 23:21:03 評論於 Please translate the following paragraph into English: 1. 我们计划在周末去海边度假,享受阳光和海风。 |
| 作者: le li 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-11-12 09:36:29 評論於 How is your article going? I haven't submitted my dip for review for about four or five days. |
| 作者: le li 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-11-12 09:32:16 評論於 How is your article? I haven't submitted it for review for four or five days. |
| 作者: lucy1103 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-11-04 08:39:11 評論於 Have you received any news? |
| 作者: milff 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-10-18 17:55:40 評論於 How is your article going? I submitted mine a few days ago and it has already been in the DIP status. It has been 4 days and there has been no change. If they are going to reject it, they should do it quickly. |
| 作者: 小禾 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-09 16:44:47 評論於 Two reviewers have finished reviewing, it has been 9 days since submission, the review process is very fast, but the time for DIP is a bit long. I searched online for the follow-up of DIP, and I am really worried. |
| 作者: baigei 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-02 17:27:08 評論於 What does "Decision in Process" mean after submitting? |
| 作者: dzy007 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-29 20:45:27 評論於 Translate the following paragraph into English: 一般 |
| 作者: masssss 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-14 22:23:13 評論於 June 28, 2025 Submitted July 11, 2025 DIP If it's DIP without being reviewed, there's no need to look at it, just move on to the next company! It's already the 14th, why haven't we received the TP notification yet??? |
| 作者: 小松接好运 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-12 17:49:25 評論於 The manuscript was sent for external review on May 12th, but we have not received the reviewers' comments yet. We may need to revise the manuscript based on the feedback before it can be accepted. |
| 作者: BSA封闭 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-24 23:37:21 評論於 This journal is not recommended for submission. The editor is too incompetent, taking more than 10 days to handle each round of submissions and reviews from authors (which adds up to nearly 20 days). It's not just slow, they also like to intentionally mess with people's emotions. We had five reviewers for the first round, all of whom suggested revisions. For the second round, the same five reviewers were assigned, but one of them (who suggested minor revisions) was removed by the editor without giving feedback. We wrote a 70-page response letter to the feedback from these five reviewers, and in the end, three accepted and one suggested minor revisions, which the editor also accepted. For the third round, the editor added another reviewer unnecessarily. It's completely unnecessary to have up to six reviewers for one article. If they wanted to add more reviewers, why not do it in the second round instead of intentionally causing more stress in the third round? If they wanted to reject the article, they could have done so directly, instead of disrespecting the efforts of the initial reviewers and the revisions made by the authors. We have spent over three months on this article with no results, and during these three months, almost two months were wasted in the editor's hands without any progress. |
| 作者: 小小杰_0130 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-20 08:13:32 評論於 Submission on January 23, 2025; Received review comments on March 19, 2025, with good evaluations from two reviewers, but many additional experiments needed, close to 40 comments in total; Revised on April 30, 2025; Accepted on May 18, 2025. Back in 2019, I had a submission that received review comments in less than a month, and was accepted 3 days after revision. It feels like things are not as fast now as they were before. However, both the reviewers and editors were very good, providing constructive feedback that significantly improved the quality of the paper after revision. Comparing Analytical Chemistry (AC) with Analytical Chemistry A (ACA), I personally feel that AC focuses more on innovation, while ACA places more emphasis on data completeness and method validation. |
| 作者: 点个板看看 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-13 09:07:04 評論於 Do you think CCL or ACA? I am a child who listens to advice. |
| 作者: 小松接好运 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-03 17:38:54 評論於 Submitted to the journal on May 3rd, hoping for a successful review process. |
| 作者: 秋沐 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-30 14:45:25 評論於 Sure, the translation of the sentence is: "It's normal, the recent editor may be very busy, all my review comments have been sent back to the editor, and it took more than ten days for the editor to send them to me." |
| 作者: 投稿都中好吗 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-29 14:11:08 評論於 It's been 12 days and it's still with the editor, is this normal? |
| 作者: S俊丽 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-27 09:26:11 評論於 Please translate the following paragraph into English: 7 |
| 作者: Bibi 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-02 05:41:05 評論於 NA |
| 作者: Bibi 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-26 15:18:58 評論於 Waiting for result |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
Contact us