期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱![]() | Analytica Chimica Acta LetPub Score 8.4
59 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.6 Influence 7.9 Speed 8.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | ANAL CHIM ACTA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0003-2670 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1873-4324 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 180 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 5.30%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | https://www.journals.elsevier.com/analytica-chimica-acta | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/ANALYTICA-CHIMICA-ACTA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Elsevier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 化学 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | NETHERLANDS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 週刊 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 1947 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 1010每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 9.62% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0003-2670%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 3.1 month(s) 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 5.9 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: 75% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
在線文章發布時間 | 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 5.6 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
|
|
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[Analytica Chimica Acta] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: BSA封闭 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-24 23:37:21 評論於 This journal is not recommended for submission. The editor is too incompetent, taking more than 10 days to handle each round of submissions and reviews from authors (which adds up to nearly 20 days). It's not just slow, they also like to intentionally mess with people's emotions. We had five reviewers for the first round, all of whom suggested revisions. For the second round, the same five reviewers were assigned, but one of them (who suggested minor revisions) was removed by the editor without giving feedback. We wrote a 70-page response letter to the feedback from these five reviewers, and in the end, three accepted and one suggested minor revisions, which the editor also accepted. For the third round, the editor added another reviewer unnecessarily. It's completely unnecessary to have up to six reviewers for one article. If they wanted to add more reviewers, why not do it in the second round instead of intentionally causing more stress in the third round? If they wanted to reject the article, they could have done so directly, instead of disrespecting the efforts of the initial reviewers and the revisions made by the authors. We have spent over three months on this article with no results, and during these three months, almost two months were wasted in the editor's hands without any progress. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 小小杰_0130 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-20 08:13:32 評論於 Submission on January 23, 2025; Received review comments on March 19, 2025, with good evaluations from two reviewers, but many additional experiments needed, close to 40 comments in total; Revised on April 30, 2025; Accepted on May 18, 2025. Back in 2019, I had a submission that received review comments in less than a month, and was accepted 3 days after revision. It feels like things are not as fast now as they were before. However, both the reviewers and editors were very good, providing constructive feedback that significantly improved the quality of the paper after revision. Comparing Analytical Chemistry (AC) with Analytical Chemistry A (ACA), I personally feel that AC focuses more on innovation, while ACA places more emphasis on data completeness and method validation. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 点个板看看 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-13 09:07:04 評論於 Do you think CCL or ACA? I am a child who listens to advice. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 小松接好运 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-03 17:38:54 評論於 Submitted to the journal on May 3rd, hoping for a successful review process. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 秋沐 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-30 14:45:25 評論於 Sure, the translation of the sentence is: "It's normal, the recent editor may be very busy, all my review comments have been sent back to the editor, and it took more than ten days for the editor to send them to me." ![]() ![]() |
作者: 投稿都中好吗 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-29 14:11:08 評論於 It's been 12 days and it's still with the editor, is this normal? ![]() ![]() |
作者: S俊丽 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-27 09:26:11 評論於 Please translate the following paragraph into English: 7 ![]() ![]() |
作者: Bibi 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-02 05:41:05 評論於 NA ![]() ![]() |
作者: Bibi 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-26 15:18:58 評論於 Waiting for result ![]() ![]() |
作者: 嗯、你说 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-19 10:04:20 評論於 Received 16 December 2024; Received the editor's reply on February 12th, with three reviewers, one rejection, two major revisions. The editor expressed efforts towards acceptance, provided 42 days for revisions, and explained the one-month review period (couldn't meet the deadline otherwise). Editor seemed supportive, replied with thanks and made revisions. Both reviewers' comments were constructive, conducted a small additional experiment, and finalized. Received in revised form 17 March 2025; Accepted 17 March 2025. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 成晓东 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-05 08:59:55 評論於 Regular operations at Elsevier lead to a lower acceptance rate for submitted manuscripts. However, very good suggestions may result in a rejected manuscript being resubmitted for consideration. ![]() ![]() |
作者: ChenChen 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-28 12:28:58 評論於 Why are they all rejecting and asking for resubmission? Both of my reviewers provided positive feedback, but the editor's decision was to reject and resubmit. ![]() ![]() |
作者: ChenChen 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-28 12:28:09 評論於 Has ACA been giving reject and resubmit requests recently? Both of my reviewers provided positive feedback, but the editor requested a reject and resubmit. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 国服干将 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-19 16:56:58 評論於 2024.9.10 submitted 2024.9.14 under review (review invitations sent 2+) 2024.10.11 reject and resubmit (review invitations accepted 2) 2024.12.13 resubmit 2024.12.15 under review (review invitations sent 2+) 2025.1.5 major revision (review invitations accepted 3) 2025.1.14 article revised 2025.1.16 under review (review invitations sent 1) 2025.1.23 minor revision 2025.1.24 article revised 2025.1.28 article accepted for publication Which one is better between this journal and Talanta? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 风生水起ycy 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-07 22:31:49 評論於 Which editor? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 风生水起ycy 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-07 22:21:32 評論於 I think this is it. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 风生水起ycy 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-07 22:21:07 評論於 How long does it take for this journal to review a resubmitted manuscript after rejection? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 成晓东 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-12-25 20:56:22 評論於 September 25, 2024 submitted September 28, 2024 under review October 23, 2024 4 reviewers: 1 minor revision, 1 major revision, 2 rejections, Editor rejected but offered a chance for resubmission November 17, 2024 resubmitted November 20, 2024 under review December 14, 2024 2 reviewers: 1 acceptance, 1 rejection, Editor inclined to reject but still offered a chance for revisions December 14, 2024 revised due to the reviewer's extreme bias, so I quickly responded to him in the response December 23, 2024 Editor changed stance after reviewing response and accepted the submission ![]() ![]() |
作者: Patrick1by 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-11-23 10:28:09 評論於 Submission on August 30, 2024 First revision on October 13, 2024 Rework on October 21, 2024 Acceptance on November 21, 2024 ![]() ![]() |
作者: 努努力发一区 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-02 00:17:08 評論於 Three reviewers, two positive and one negative. Is there still a chance after the rejection and resubmission suggested by the editor? The editor mentioned including in the CV the modifications made based on the feedback. Are these usually the same reviewers as before? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 不萌 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-09-25 12:51:08 評論於 Please limit the abstract to 15,000 characters for submission. ![]() ![]() |
作者: Wei 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-09-06 13:49:38 評論於 The two reviewers had a total of ten questions, both giving minor revisions. The editor then gave an accept after major revision, which took a total of three months. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 努努力发一区 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-08-09 22:06:58 評論於 I want to ask if this journal generally requires one or two reviewers? I have seen that two have already accepted the review. Is this enough reviewers? I was rejected by the previous journal because I did not invite reviewers, which has left a shadow on me. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 鼎舜 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-08-01 12:46:38 評論於 Hello! May I ask if resubmitting will be quicker? I submitted 8 days ago and have not heard back from the editor yet. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 鼎舜 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-08-01 12:44:14 評論於 Excuse me, will resubmitting be faster? I submitted a week ago and still haven't heard back from the editor. ![]() ![]() |
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us