Not recommended for submission. Apart from having to submit various confidential documents and mail them, it is really troublesome compared to other magazines. Also, they do not have a latex template, only a word template. For those who submitted in latex, they have to adjust the latex template themselves if the format is not correct. Finally, after finally figuring out the format on 9.26, the submission was rejected on 9.27 without any reason. All they provided were template words. I really feel that if they wanted to reject it from the beginning, there was no need to torture people with format issues.

(0) 讚！ | 投稿顺利，不被退稿

Only Word, very uncomfortable.

(0) 讚！ | 不想起床的Neet菌

The host seems to have just started doing scientific research, but at my current stage, I can understand the two questions raised by the reviewers very well.

Reviewer 1 thinks that too much basic knowledge is just padding, making it seem like there is less of what you have done. The questioning of the control group and indicators in the experiment is to confirm the credibility of the results you provide and the advancement of the results compared to existing research.

Reviewer 2 mentioned that the introduction is disorganized, meaning that there is no clear logical structure in the introduction regarding related research, instead of simply listing existing studies to meet a quota. The explanation of motivation and contribution is very important, as it is the necessary support for your research. Otherwise, what is the point of doing this research if you cannot even justify it? The logical writing of the introduction is precisely to present the reasoning behind the research motivation.

(0) 讚！ | 不想起床的Neet菌

Can submissions only be made in Word format?

(0) 讚！ | undefined

Where can I find a LaTeX template? I've been searching for it all day

(0) 讚！ | Renruonan

Not highly recommended for submission.

(0) 讚！ | 搞学术的小苹果

I was also rejected and found that everyone's reasons for rejection are the same. Be cautious in your investments.

(0) 讚！ | 搞学术的小苹果

The feedback received is all formatted stuff.

(0) 讚！ | 搞学术的小苹果

I would like to briefly share my personal experience of submitting papers for reference:
Submitted on 16th March 22, and it was received and sent for review on the same day.
On 17th August 22, it showed that the reviewers had finished reviewing. During this period, there was no display of the review progress. I only saw that the editor had sent it to 5-8 reviewers. After reminding once, they said it was being reviewed, so I had to wait.
Rejected on 6th September 22. The opinions of the two reviewers are as follows:
Reviewer 1: The overall structure of the paper is good. The description of the basic knowledge section is redundant. The experimental and analytical parts of the manuscript lack clear control groups or other comparison indicators. Rejected. (Very vague opinion, did not point out where and what kind of control experiments and indicators are missing, not helpful for improving the paper, and also doubted whether the reviewer understood the author's experimental content)
Reviewer 2: The organization of the introduction is confusing, and the author should reorganize this part. The motivation and contribution of this work should be clarified and emphasized. Try to set the issues discussed in this paper more clearly and write a paragraph to define the problem. No decision on accepting/rejecting the manuscript was given. (Obviously, they didn't read my experiment and directly rejected it after reading the abstract and introduction)
In short, it took half a year for this journey, and what I got was two vague review opinions plus an editor's rejection. The experience was very bad. The email did not mention the possibility of appeal, so I assume that there is no way to appeal, and I am too lazy to argue with such reviewers.
I will not submit to this journal in the future.

(4) 讚！ | abooksword

interim decision - I recently saw the system status for the past two days, but I don't know what it means. I am also curious, thanks.

(0) 讚！ | AA华蓥山NU

Publish over 100 articles a year. A few days ago, the submission number was close to 1500, indicating a severe backlog of manuscripts. No specific feedback was given, and two days later, it was directly rejected with a suggestion to submit to another journal. The article was not kept in reserve, and the editor was straightforward. It seems that domestic English journals are becoming increasingly competitive, so careful consideration is required when submitting unless one is an expert in the field.

(0) 讚！ | 自由翼

May I ask how long it takes to receive the results after this status (Interim Decision), OP?

(0) 讚！ | 阿生6013

It has been over three months, and there is still no news. How are you doing?

(0) 讚！ | AA华蓥山NU

It has been three months, and the external review results have not been returned yet. It feels like the publication's speed has slowed down a lot.

(0) 讚！ | AA华蓥山NU

There have been 4 reviewers, and it has been over 5 months since the submission, but there has been no response.

(0) 讚！ | snbsh

I have been submitting to this journal for two and a half months, and the external review has been ongoing for over two months. May I ask how long it usually takes for the external reviewers to provide feedback? Thank you. Additionally, I would like to inquire about the price of the publication fee for this journal. How much does it cost for one page approximately?

(0) 讚！ | AA华蓥山NU

2020. 5. 21 Submission
2021. 1. 21 Major revision, two reviewers, constructive feedback, mainly supplementing experimental content
2021. 1. 25 Submit revised manuscript
2021. 3. 09 Received results, reviewers agreed to accept, undergoing plagiarism check
2021. 5. 27 Acceptance notification, encountered a small issue in between, did not receive acceptance email sent by the editor, after contacting via phone, it was resent again
Currently awaiting publication.

(4) 讚！ | 飞飞果冻

Before, when I submitted, it would be very quick. After submitting the revisions, it took about a month to be accepted. After submitting the publication fee, I received the acceptance letter within approximately a month (specific time is not clear). Several months later, the manuscript was proofread. It was published in the first quarter of this year, which took 3 to 4 months from submission to acceptance and one year from acceptance to publication. It can be considered relatively fast in terms of speed within the field of SCI.

(0) 讚！ | 四片叶子的三叶草

Interim decision should be the editors summarizing the reviewers' opinions, which would take approximately two weeks.

(0) 讚！ | 飞飞果冻

May I ask, how long does it take to check for plagiarism after the final decision stage? How long after the check do I need to pay the page fee? How long until I receive the acceptance notification?

(0) 讚！ | limingcui

Same question, after the final decision, how long does it take to check for plagiarism? How long after checking is the layout fee required to be paid? How long does it take to receive the acceptance notice?

(0) 讚！ | limingcui

How long did your interim decision last? What does it mean?

(0) 讚！ | 北京视觉小白

The status of the paper is Interim Decision. May I ask what does this mean? Please teach me!

(1) 讚！ | 北京视觉小白

Hello, may I ask how long it will take for the journal to enter the Final Decision stage, complete plagiarism check, fill in invoice information, and receive the acceptance notification?

(0) 讚！ | 飞飞果冻

Hiring for a small editing job, lasting for a total of 4 months. The layout fee is eight thousand, and it requires blind review. The formatting needs to be done using the journal's Word template on schedule.

(1) 讚！ | qwerqwer