2025.07.29 Under Review. This article was submitted for review the same day it was assigned. It was previously submitted to Nature Chemistry and rejected by four reviewers. After revisions and unsuccessful appeals, it was then submitted to JACS but not reviewed, so it was submitted to Angew instead.

(0) 讚！ | 薛定谔猫

How about it, have you submitted it for review?

(0) 讚！ | zzzz

2025.07.25 Submitted for review
2025.07.29 With Editor

(0) 讚！ | 薛定谔猫

2024.11.22 Submit
2024.11.28 Under Review
2025.1.13 Major revision 5% 20%
2025.1.24 In revision
2025.02.05 Accept

(0) 讚！ | Yaphet2025

5.20 Submit
5.23 Under review
6.10 Major revision 5% 5%
6.21 In revision
7.2 Accept

(0) 讚！ | Yaphet2025

2025.05.22 Submitted
2025.06.10 First review completed, with 3 reviewers
2025.07.05 Revision submitted
2025.07.22 Second review completed, one of the reviewers provided 5 additional comments, minor revisions, editor provided seven days for revisions
Hope it goes smoothly

(0) 讚！ | 小可乐呀小可乐

There will be both fast and slow situations, be patient and wait.

(0) 讚！ | Jeremy Cheung

Does the second review take so long? It's been two weeks since I submitted it, and I'm getting anxious.

(0) 讚！ | 小可乐呀小可乐

20250418 Submitted
20250424 With Editor
20250426 Under Review
20250514 Major Revision (5%-20%)
20250611 Revision Submitted
20250616 Under Review
20250711 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | Jeremy Ching

After the initial submission to Angew, there were 2 major revisions and 1 rejection. The editor rejected the revised manuscript, so it was resubmitted. After half a year of revisions, the manuscript was submitted again and accepted for review. It was directly accepted after a month of review. It took nearly half a year in total, but fortunately the outcome was positive.

(0) 讚！ | Alpenglow

You can argue based on the reasons for the rejection.

(0) 讚！ | yzf

Submission deadline: July 14, 2025.

(0) 讚！ | yzf

I would like to ask if it is possible to submit to Angewandte Chemie after not being sent for review. The core ideas of the paper remain unchanged, but more evidence has been added for validation. Is it possible to submit to Angewandte Chemie again, or should I email the editor to inquire?

(0) 讚！ | hhhhhhHNature

From AM, I can see that you have quite a lot of comments, and now there are even more comments on Angew.

(0) 讚！ | tianshi

That's not necessarily the case, those who have been criticized have not been said to be bad. Those who cannot criticize are simply spreading rumors.

(0) 讚！ | 发布了文章的张三

Although my reputation is getting worse, I still managed to catch the last train and had an article accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 者学海上

You are pretty lucky.

(0) 讚！ | qq572020211

20240926 Submitted
20240927 Under Review
20241007 Transfer AHM
20241108 argue
20241112 Editor agrees
20241113 Submitted
20250120 major (format）
20250123 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | c207206

You must have definitely submitted it for review.

(0) 讚！ | qq572020211

You must have submitted this for review, right?

(0) 讚！ | qq572020211

You should submit this for review, shouldn't you?

(0) 讚！ | qq572020211

May 6, 2025 submitted
Still no news on the 29th.

(0) 讚！ | Louisdt

You should have submitted this for review by now, it's been such a long time.

(0) 讚！ | qq572020211

Any news?

(0) 讚！ | aaaaaa

20250213 Submitted
20250215 Under Review edited by Dr. Ethan Culverhouse
20250408 Major Revision by 2 reviewers
20250428 Revision Submitted
20250507 Accepted
The level and influence of Angew are naturally not something I need to praise, which is very attractive to researchers. This submission went relatively smoothly, with very professional comments from the two reviewers that were very helpful for the paper. The editor was also quite friendly, although the processing speed compared to other published papers in this field was much slower.

(0) 讚！ | 雲中鶴