| 期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | Journal of Translational Medicine LetPub Score 7.2
50 ratings
Rate
Reputation 7.5 Influence 6.5 Speed 8.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 期刊簡稱 | J TRANSL MED | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 1479-5876 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| h-index | 87 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| 自引率 (2023-2024) | 1.60%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| 官方網站 | http://translational-medicine.biomedcentral.com | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/jtrm/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 開放訪問 | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版商 | BioMed Central | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 主題領域 | 医学 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版國/地區 | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 發行頻率 | 不定期刊行 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 創刊年 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 每年文章數 | 1074每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 黃金OA百分比 | 99.84% | ||||||||||||||||||||
OA Related Info![]() | APC: Yes( GBP2790; USD3790; EUR3090; ) APC waiver:Check Notes Other charges: No Keywords: human experimentation、translational medicine Useful LinksAims & ScopeAuthor InstructionsEditorial BoardAnonymous peer review | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| 索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1479-5876%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: Average 1 Month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: About 50% | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| *所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
| [Journal of Translational Medicine] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
| 作者: Lucky C 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-02 21:02:03 評論於 This journal is very efficient. We told the editors that they basically accept within 2 months, accepting over ten articles in a month. There is not much initial review, just formatting checks. Overall, the process is very friendly. |
| 作者: jayden2026 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-30 14:19:39 評論於 Thank you! I also wish you success and a speedy recovery! |
| 作者: 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-26 10:35:59 評論於 I didn't procrastinate too much qwq. I saw someone getting rejected by a journal after a month of peer review. The next journal will definitely be better! |
| 作者: jayden2026 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-25 22:21:19 評論於 Rejected in less than 5 days, with no reasons or comments provided. |
| 作者: jayden2026 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-25 22:20:53 評論於 In less than five days, the draft will be submitted. |
| 作者: 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-25 22:12:38 評論於 Excuse me, has the big shot started editing? |
| 作者: 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-24 17:40:28 評論於 Excuse me, do you have any submissions for review? |
| 作者: myq1976 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-17 20:05:21 評論於 3.30ur, 5.05ea, 5.16 major revision |
| 作者: jayden2026 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-13 13:24:45 評論於 5.11 新的子页面 5.12 编辑人员已指定 |
| 作者: 小蒋同学爱学习 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-10 07:58:12 評論於 The new submission has been pending for over two months. After urging for a template and waiting for another half a month, the submission was directly rejected. The journal's submission volume has surged, but the efficiency in handling manuscripts is too slow. It's causing delays in graduation. Frustrating! |
| 作者: 接Accept 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-06 19:35:23 評論於 The editing quality and speed are really disappointing. It took two months and three reminders to get a response, and when they finally replied, they even got the surname of the corresponding author wrong ?. My boss is not surnamed Sun! Today, I finally had enough and rejected the manuscript directly with a template rejection, without giving any reasons, just stating that it was rejected. Are you sure you even read it? No chance for revisions, just a direct rejection. What else can be said? It's just impressive how arrogant they are. This kind of behavior from a rising star in the field is truly disappointing. |
| 作者: zybb 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-28 16:19:06 評論於 Reviewer agreed. Isn't it just finding a reviewer? It's just that there weren't enough reviewers, so it took so long. |
| 作者: VIVI59 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-18 10:14:21 評論於 Does selecting agree to Research Square mean submitting a preprint for early public access? Not selecting is not an option. |
| 作者: myq1976 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-09 09:24:25 評論於 Excuse me, isn't RA just looking for reviewers? Is the quantity not enough? |
| 作者: Vaidurya111 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 5.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-05 15:35:09 評論於 I hate you jtm. I waited for a month for a response, followed up for three and a half months, and sent two or three emails asking the editor to find reviewers, but received no response. After wasting four and a half months, I had no choice but to withdraw the submission, and the assistant editor responded immediately. With no other options, I submitted to Nutrients under mdpi. I thought the topic was not too niche (the paper has already been cited five or six times in less than five months after publication), so why was it so difficult to find reviewers? I couldn't find a single one! I deeply suspect that the editor did not properly invite reviewers, as their attitude was extremely negative. Recently jtm has been promoted and the impact factor has increased, which really saddens me. Even if they had rejected me after the initial review, I would have been okay with it. |
| 作者: yu125025644 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-02 12:13:33 評論於 2025.11.17 submission 2025.12.14 major revision Editor gave one month for revision, but later found it impossible to complete and applied for another month 2026.02.13 submission 2026.02.16 under review 2026.03.08 reviewer assigned Feeling frustrated... thinking that they must be unsatisfied with the revisions and sought another reviewer 2026.03.19 under review 2026.03.27 editor assigned 2026.03.30 editor assigned 2026.04.01 accept |
| 作者: 狂乱陆公子 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-30 18:38:52 評論於 2.28 UR, one reminder for submission, and then on 3.8 UR changed again. ? |
| 作者: 狂乱陆公子 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-30 18:19:10 評論於 Please change the due date from 3.8 to UR. |
| 作者: myq1976 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-30 16:02:20 評論於 I think it's okay to ask. |
| 作者: myq1976 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-30 16:01:24 評論於 I had my under review today on the 30th. Wish you good luck too. |
| 作者: 气球260112 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-30 12:29:10 評論於 Yes, it has been 20 days since the resubmission, and it is still in New Submission status. I am a bit conflicted about whether to send an email to inquire. What do you all think? |
| 作者: 进击的乌龟王 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-29 22:23:58 評論於 It's been 20 days, still waiting for submission. |
| 作者: myq1976 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-25 13:23:47 評論於 Is it still a new submission after 15 days? |
| 作者: 气球260112 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-25 10:57:27 評論於 Three days after the first submission, please supplement the original image of the complete WB membrane. The status will be updated to "New Submission" on the same day after uploading. It has been 15 days since then, no changes, still waiting.. |
| 作者: myq1976 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-19 14:28:22 評論於 Record submission, new submission on March 9th, editorial assessment on March 11th, it's been ten days and still no news. ? |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
Contact us