How are you?

(0) 讚！ | YINHANG

This is too slow.

(0) 讚！ | 骑鱼的猫.

Still in WE.

(0) 讚！ | llllw

Has your manuscript been submitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | 骑鱼的猫.

Friend, have you submitted it for review?

(0) 讚！ | 骑鱼的猫.

Personal experience, for reference.

(1) 讚！ | 张小凡

Dec 25, 2024: With Editor
Feb 03, 2025: Under Review (5/0/0)
Feb 24, 2025: (9/2/0)
Mar 25, 2025: Under Review (12/2/2)
Apr 02, 2025: Revise (Major Revision Due in Jun 01, 2025)
May 26, 2025: Revise (Request for revision extension)
Jun 27, 2025: With Editor (Revision)
Jun 28, 2025: With Editor
Jun 30, 2025: Under Review (2/0/0)
Jul 29, 2025: Completed-Accept
Aug 1, 2025: Review the proofs of the article
Aug 3, 2025: Proofs available for checking
Aug 4, 2025: Available online

(0) 讚！ | 张小凡

Aug 2, 2025 Submitted to Journal

(0) 讚！ | llllw

Submitted to Journal on August 2, 2024.

(0) 讚！ | llllw

Don't waste what has been submitted.

(0) 讚！ | Hirze

May I ask what stage you are currently in, and how long it typically takes for a decision to be under review after the initial stage?

(0) 讚！ | xiaonan152

Do not let down what has been invested

(0) 讚！ | Luuuo

2024-6-1 submitted to journal
2024-6-4 with editor
2024-6-11 Reject
Does not fit journal scope

(0) 讚！ | kantanna

I had three reviewers:
The first one was relatively positive, very careful in reviewing, even noticed the typos, basically asked for minor revisions and gave a few suggestions;
The second one was neutral, basically asked for major revisions and gave a few comments;
The third one nitpicked on various aspects, criticized the title, lack of innovation, and provided various reasons, directly recommending rejection.
Finally rejected. I emailed the editor explaining the situation, also told him that I will revise according to the reviewers' comments, and explained the revision plan, hoping for a chance to resubmit. However, the editor replied that since I did not have the support of all the reviewers, they could not change the decision to reject.
In this case, can I still resubmit?

(0) 讚！ | Gimu

There is a high chance of getting rehired after resubmission. In our case, after major revisions were made and resubmitted, we were accepted after only minor revisions, with the same reviewer as before

(0) 讚！ | Lotiss

The translation of the text into English is: 

In a similar situation as mine, I withdrew and resubmitted. After resubmission, it still went through three reviewers and took over six months. However, it came back as a major revision and was accepted directly after the changes were made. From the first submission to the final acceptance, it took nearly two years.

(0) 讚！ | xixi0428

Special thanks to Weiqi Zhou for editing, very efficient and responsible!

(0) 讚！ | 丢味

08.23 submit
09.03 with editor
09.10 under review
10.27 major revision
12.13 with editor
12.17 under review
02.02 under review, updated time (with editor rejection)
04.17 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | 丢味

I have experienced being rejected and resubmitting, but after making revisions for a month and sending it back, the editor rejected it again without providing specific reasons.

(0) 讚！ | 无敌破坏汪

The initial review took 4 months and resulted in rejection with the option to resubmit. Both the editor and reviewers acknowledged the presence of innovation but requested significant revisions. The resubmission must include a revision statement. I would like to ask if any colleagues have encountered this situation with the journal and if the chances of acceptance are higher after making the suggested revisions and resubmitting.

(0) 讚！ | gyj0619

After years of conducting interdisciplinary research, the study was innovative and required a significant amount of work. Two reviewers provided detailed feedback, greatly improving the overall quality of the article. The editing process was rigorous. Many additional experiments and arguments were added during the later stages, resulting in a year-long acceptance process. We hope that LANDUP, as a top journal in the field of urban research, continues to thrive and its impact factor continues to rise.

(20) 讚！ | 公里之花

It took nine months to complete the review process. The initial review took three months, the second review took one and a half months, and the final review took one month. The remaining time was spent in the hands of the editor. Overall, the speed was relatively slow, especially the speed at which the editor processed the manuscripts, which usually took at least half a month. However, the industry recognition is high, so it was worth the time spent. I hope to have 1-2 more LANDUP papers during my doctoral period.

(2) 讚！ | 无敌破坏汪

First review took 6 months, with two reviewers providing minor and major revisions respectively. The editor suggested major revisions, and I am very happy to receive the revised manuscript back after 20 days. The two reviewers provided many excellent suggestions that helped improve the paper. Thank you to both reviewers! Thank you to editor Zhou Weiqi! I am grateful! I will continue to work hard in the future and strive for more opportunities to publish in LANDUP!

(7) 讚！ | vv亚

No, I am a researcher in the field of remote sensing.

(16) 讚！ | 遥感人

Are you referring to the recent publication on the increased flood risk caused by changes in land use in China over the past 40 years?

(0) 讚！ | 雨落凡尘