Submitted in September of 24, received feedback in November, major revision, not difficult to make the changes, dragged it out until the deadline was extended by two weeks, finally submitted the revised version at the end of February, directly accepted on April 15, relatively smoothly.

Submitted to PiO in the second half of 23, published in the third tier.
Submitted to GRL in 23, in GRL second tier in 25.
Submitted to LO in the second half of 24, promoted to second tier in 25.

Ocean Soros, the god of shorting journals.
This year, planning to join forces with Trump to short Nature for all brothers and sisters.

(0) 讚！ | An_apple_a_day

25 points deducted, speechless.

(0) 讚！ | hahaTT!

请问您需要什么帮助？

(0) 讚！ | hahaTT!

Is there a timeline for this? Will the assistant editor be notified by email for the assignment?

(0) 讚！ | jneuf

Is it effective to use WR and EST when looking for a job outside?

(0) 讚！ | lewin

Can you please clarify if "under review" refers to an internal audit or an external audit? If it is an internal audit, will the status change after the external audit is completed?

(0) 讚！ | lewin

Does "under review" mean that it has been sent for peer review?

(0) 讚！ | phyto-zxw

After four months under review, it has finally been revised

(0) 讚！ | kyd

What is the current status now?

(0) 讚！ | phyto-zxw

I just submitted my application and it has been "under review" for 10 days already. Haven't received any updates yet. Does this mean it is under evaluation?

(0) 讚！ | phyto-zxw

The application was submitted in April, and about 1 week later it showed "under review." There has been no further progress or updates since then

(0) 讚！ | Zichuan Wang

2024-1-29 submitted
2024-1-31 Under Review

(2) 讚！ | kyd

From the submission to acceptance and online publication took 7 months, which seems relatively fast based on the comments from everyone. As a professional journal with high recognition in limnology and oceanography, the reviewers' comments were very professional. These classic journals have low publication rates and high requirements for innovation, which cannot be compared to high-impact environmental journals

(8) 讚！ | hahaya

May I ask who the deputy editor chosen is?

(1) 讚！ | 子思

Which deputy editor did you choose?

(1) 讚！ | 子思

What is the direction of the article? Which deputy editor did you choose?

(1) 讚！ | 子思

Excuse me, after a few hours of submitting, it changed to "under review," and then after 5 days, the status became "pending recommendation." Does this mean it's not looking good? It feels too soon, perhaps the editorial review did not pass?

(0) 讚！ | 浮游植物

The original text, "楼主这个耗时1年，确实够慢的," translates to English as "OP, this took one year, indeed quite slow."

(0) 讚！ | hahaya

Personal second LO, the overall level of the journal is very high, and the review process is also very strict. The LO's reputation in the field of oceanography needs no introduction, but the review period is indeed too long.

Submitted on 22nd March 2018
Major revision on 12th August 2022
Revision requested on 3rd October 2022
Minor revision on 12th December 2022
Revision requested on 28th January 2023
Accepted on 5th April 2023

The long review period and slightly low efficiency of the editors seem to be common issues in old-fashioned journals like LO JPO. However, it is worth it that the article was eventually accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 松岭路北

Based on my own experience, it feels like LO, this journal, "Under review" means it is in the internal review status by the editor. "Pending Recommendation" is when it is sent for external peer review. Then, once the review results are received, it will be in "Pending Decision" status.

(0) 讚！ | 松岭路北

It looks like the host's submission entered the review process after half a month, so why is it now that the submission is sent to the editor-in-chief the next day and shows "Under review"?

(0) 讚！ | hahaya

After I submit, the names of the assigned EIC and ADM will be displayed. "Under review" means that it has been sent for external review, and a one-month review period is typical for this journal. If it exceeds one and a half months or two months, I personally think it is appropriate to send an email to inquire.

(0) 讚！ | Riza

This is the details of the status change timeline, hopefully, it will be helpful for you.
2 days (2021-10-18 to 2021-10-20) from submit to Under Review
34 days (2021-10-20 to 2021-11-23) from Under Review to Pending Recommendation
22 days (2021-11-23 to 2021-12-15) from Pending Recommendation to Pending decision
2 days (2021-12-15 to 2021-12-17) from Pending Decision to Decision

Translation: This is the timeline of changes in status. It may provide useful information for you.
2 days (2021-10-18 to 2021-10-20) from submission to being under review
34 days (2021-10-20 to 2021-11-23) from being under review to pending recommendation
22 days (2021-11-23 to 2021-12-15) from pending recommendation to pending decision
2 days (2021-12-15 to 2021-12-17) from pending decision to decision.

(0) 讚！ | Riza

Does the status "Under Review" appear immediately after submission? My article has been in the hands of the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) for over a month and it has been in "Under Review" status all this time. I don't know if this is still in the initial review or if it has been sent for review. Is it only after the Associate Editor (AE) is assigned that it is sent for review?

(0) 讚！ | 树丁Yue

2021-10-18 Submit
2021-10-20 Under Review
2021-11-23 Pending Recommendation
2021-12-15 Pending decision
2021-12-17 Major Revision
2022-02-28 Resubmit
2022-03-01 Under Review
2022-04-15 Pending Recommendation
2022-05-01 Pending Decision
2022-05-04 Minor Revision
2022-06-06 Resubmit
2022-06-07 Under Review
2022-08-12 Pending recommendation
2022-08-22 Accept

(0) 讚！ | kuikui