| 期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | MARINE STRUCTURES LetPub Score 6.5
50 ratings
Rate
Reputation 7.7 Influence 5.4 Speed 7.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 期刊簡稱 | MAR STRUCT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 0951-8339 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| h-index | 55 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 自引率 (2023-2024) | 10.00%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 官方網站 | http://www.journals.elsevier.com/marine-structures/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/MASTR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版商 | Elsevier BV | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 主題領域 | 工程技术 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版國/地區 | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 發行頻率 | 四半期刊行 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 創刊年 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 每年文章數 | 134每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 黃金OA百分比 | 20.51% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0951-8339%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: >12 Week(s), or Invited contributions 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 16.5 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: Easy 來自Elsevier的數據: 43% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| *所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
| [MARINE STRUCTURES] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
| 作者: suprecao 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-19 10:57:09 評論於 We are in the second month of the We stage. When we submitted to the We stage for over a month, we were reminded once, but it seems to be of little use. The editor has added a reviewer once, the previous ratio was 5-1-0. If you need it urgently, it is not recommended to submit to this stage as it is too slow. It feels like it takes half a year to get started, so be prepared for a year. It is recommended to remind once if there is a chance, it's okay. |
| 作者: wxz666 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-19 10:19:48 評論於 I see, thank you for the clarification. However, this speed is too slow, urging won't help. |
| 作者: suprecao 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-19 09:55:59 評論於 My submission was made by my teacher. I can only check the status of my submission using the manuscript code on the iThenticate Research Publishing Service official account. I'm sorry I can't help you. It has been half a year and the status is still 9-1-0, too slow. |
| 作者: wxz666 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-18 09:04:13 評論於 Hello, host. I'd like to ask, when you submitted your manuscript, did you see the status "Submission Received via Ingest"? I have been submitting for two to three days with my Aseville account, and it has been like this the whole time. After entering the EM system, it doesn't show that this manuscript was submitted. |
| 作者: suprecao 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-07 11:05:12 評論於 Unable to find reviewers, submission has been pending for over 5 months, currently at 9-1-0. |
| 作者: leibron1 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-02 11:08:04 評論於 Brother, I've read your inner thoughts, it's too real, hahaha, just a little change. |
| 作者: suprecao 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-01-28 14:45:51 評論於 2025.9.24 STJ 2025.12.07 UR 5-1-0 2026.01.28 UR 5-1-0 The editor has been working on it for over two months, with a reminder in between, and it is still 5-1-0. It is too slow, I don't know when it can be fixed. |
| 作者: 四号芥菜 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-11-09 21:48:45 評論於 The quality of the reviewers varies, and one of them maliciously rejected the submission. |
| 作者: 上会优青 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 5.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-11-03 14:31:09 評論於 The editor is very responsible, processes quickly, and the reviewers' comments are also very fair and to the point, which greatly helped improve my article. |
| 作者: kingtonali 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-14 22:04:07 評論於 Accepted before graduation on June 13, 2025! Congratulations! It took more than half a year, although it was very painful, but fortunately the result is good! |
| 作者: kingtonali 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-12 15:06:35 評論於 2025.06.11 Decision in Process, RRC finally DIP half a month later, hope to be accepted directly this time! |
| 作者: kingtonali 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-29 12:16:12 評論於 2025.05.29 RRC, both reviewers have responded with comments, hoping for direct acceptance, must be accepted directly, praying, knocking on wood... |
| 作者: kingtonali 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-25 15:29:08 評論於 On May 25, 2025, only one reviewer replied with comments, while the other invited reviewer has not responded yet. It's really frustrating and feels so difficult. Graduation is less than a month away, I hope to receive feedback as soon as possible. |
| 作者: kingtonali 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-20 13:43:42 評論於 2025.05.20 Under Review After repeated urging, the manuscript has finally been submitted for review and has been sent back to the original two reviewers. Currently, one reviewer has already responded quickly, hopefully with a positive outcome. We are hoping for the other reviewer to approve it soon. I have not found a job yet, but I am hoping that this article will be accepted before I start looking again. Fingers crossed. |
| 作者: kingtonali 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-15 14:50:56 評論於 2025.05.15 With Editor It's been a whole month, no news at all, all kinds of reminders have no effect, really helpless, can only pray for a quick review, why is the review process so slow, and still only given 21 days for revisions... |
| 作者: kingtonali 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-11 15:49:06 評論於 Since 04.14 With editor, there has been no change. I have sent several reminders but to no avail. It's really frustrating. So slow. I won't submit again in the future... |
| 作者: kingtonali 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-14 19:37:23 評論於 On April 14, 2025, returned for revision on the day of the deadline, because busy with revising the thesis, the suggestions were revised without further checking. MS is indeed more difficult than OE, the reviewers superficially acknowledged, and the questions raised were more and more tricky. I barely managed to answer all of them, with a total of ten thousand words of response. I hope this time they can accept it quickly, as I cannot afford to delay my graduation any longer with more revisions. |
| 作者: kingtonali 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-27 17:23:40 評論於 On March 24, 2025, the editor provided major revisions, with a total of 19 comments from two reviewers, and gave a 21-day revision period. The first review took nearly four months, hoping to complete the revisions as soon as possible. |
| 作者: kingtonali 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-22 17:18:55 評論於 After various reminders for submission, I decided to pass on DIP. Should I reject it or just reject it quickly? Ah, it's just a regular journal in Zone 2 of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the cost-effectiveness is unmatched... |
| 作者: slkdahwww 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 直接被接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-19 13:50:05 評論於 How is it going now? |
| 作者: kingtonali 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-12 16:33:04 評論於 On February 12, 2025, RRC is still the same. The last reviewer did not reply, and the editor did not respond at all. Is it really just pure negligence? I will not submit to them again in the future, the cost-effectiveness is too poor. |
| 作者: kingtonali 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-05 22:25:43 評論於 Today I decided not to wait any longer. The third reviewer is probably running away or deliberately delaying. After reading the comments of various authors, I estimate that the editor will continue to wait and delay. It's probably going to take half a year or a year to get started. I might as well directly urge the customer service to review the manuscript. The editor can make a decision as soon as possible. It's better to accept a rejection. Perhaps I can catch up with graduation and job hunting by submitting to a faster journal earlier. This is the most anticipated rejection during the Ph.D. period. With the current competition pressure on young people, no one can bear a year or more of the review process... |
| 作者: kingtonali 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-01-31 13:36:24 評論於 2025.01.30 RRC, two of the reviewers have already provided their feedback, we are waiting for the last one, hoping that this big shot can reply as soon as possible. |
| 作者: kingtonali 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-12-30 19:15:08 評論於 2024.12.28 Under review, sent to three reviewers for evaluation, hoping to receive feedback as soon as possible. |
| 作者: kingtonali 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-12-13 13:48:46 評論於 Submitted on December 4, 2024, assigned to editor Niedzwecki Hope this submission can be processed quickly. It is the 6th article during my doctoral period, nearing graduation. I originally wanted to publish in an open-access journal to find a job, but my advisor insisted on submitting to a prestigious journal. Although the journal has high industry recognition, the processing speed is extremely slow. I heard it could take up to one to two years. It is frustrating to be forced to submit to such a journal when I am about to graduate. Regardless of the reasons, this behavior is definitely not in the best interest of the students. In conclusion, I hope this submission will be successful and accepted before graduation. If not, I will have very little hope of finding a good job. I also hope that other doctoral students can avoid encountering such advisors. It is really disheartening to be in this situation nearing graduation. |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
Contact us