Sure enough, the second review was rejected, and it seems that DIP is the prelude to rejection.
The second review still has the same four reviewers: two accepted, one minor revision, and the reviewer who rejected it still rejected it (not believing in the experimental results).
I have published dozens of SCI papers big and small, and this is the first time I have encountered revision and rejection, it turned out to be ML (crying face), commemorating it. 8888

(0) 讚！ | HDUer

Without additional display, the invitation to reviewers and review information is checked on WeChat. You can follow the ASV Research Publishing Service official account to track the progress of the paper review.

(0) 讚！ | HDUer

Brother, is this interactive plot viewer above necessary? The editor also suggested this to me, thank you.

(0) 讚！ | xiaohe

My document has also been moderately revised and is now under review after being sent back for corrections.

(1) 讚！ | xiaohe

Under Review invites reviewer 2+*. Is your status only displayed as Under Review or is there any additional information shown? My Under Review status has not changed but the date has changed from 4.19 to 5.11. Today it has changed to 5.25. Can you please clarify this situation?

(0) 讚！ | 吃鸡不吃土豆

What's going on with RRC, it's been two weeks already.

(0) 讚！ | 咕咕鸡诶

May 1, 2025 Revision was done by YF Zheng. Surprisingly, there were four reviewers (quite impressive), two minor revisions, one major revision, and one rejection.
May 12, 2025 Re-submitted directly refuted some comments, unnecessary to add comprehensive data as ML is a concise article.
May 13, 2025 Under review should probably go back to the hands of the previous four reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | HDUer

Excuse me, if DIP appears in ML review, it's doomed.

(0) 讚！ | 马大三儿

Hello, will a manuscript be rejected if DIP occurs during the ML review?

(0) 讚！ | 马大三儿

3.12 submitted
3.14 with editor
3.19 under review
3.24 Invited 2+, 1 accepted

(0) 讚！ | saluuu

4.13 moderate revision
5.7 with editor

(0) 讚！ | saluuu

I wrote a letter and submitted it to Chemical Communications, but I am anxious to publish it and do not want to wait any longer. I have decided to directly modify and submit it to Materials Letter instead.

Apr 06, 2025 Submit
Apr 08, 2025 With Editor
Apr 10, 2025 Under Review Invited Reviewer 2+*
Apr 11, 2025 Under Review Accepted Reviewer 2
Apr 14, 2025 Under Review Accepted Reviewer 2+*
Looking forward to good news...

(0) 讚！ | HDUer

2025.2.17 submit to journal
2025.2.23 with editor
2025.2.28 under review
2025.3.2 moderate revise
2025.4.1 with editor
2025.4.5 accept

The review process was very quick, with two reviewers for the first round and the editors handling the correspondence very promptly.

(0) 讚！ | donkey丶

2025.2.17 submitted to journal
2025.2.23 with editor
2025.2.28 under review
2025.3.2 moderate revise
2025.3.31 with editor
2025.4.6 accepted 
The review process was fast, with two reviewers providing relatively neutral feedback, and the editor was very friendly.

(0) 讚！ | donkey丶

Yes, the word count should be within 2000 words and should not exceed 8 pages (including references).

(0) 讚！ | saluuu

Hello, may I ask if this journal only accepts articles with a maximum of 2000 words?

(0) 讚！ | 安an

3.12 Submitted
3.14 WE
3.19 UR
3.24 Only one reviewer accepted the review.

(0) 讚！ | saluuu

A very pleasant and efficient submission experience, from submission to acceptance in 37 days.

2025.2.17 submitted
2025.2.24 under review, accepted by 3 reviewers
2025.3.8 major revisions, with a total of 18 comments
2025.3.17 revised
2025.3.26 accepted

(0) 讚！ | Fxiaoduanku

Do we need to undergo another external audit for the rework? My moderately revised work has been sent back for rework and has been in the "with editor" status for over ten days with no progress. I have also sent an email inquiring about it, but have not received a response.

(1) 讚！ | 磕盐达人

2025.2.17 submit to journal
2025.2.23 with editor
2025.2.28 under review
2025.2.2 moderate revise

(0) 讚！ | donkey丶

On March 18, 2025, reviewers provided generally positive feedback and suggestions.

(0) 讚！ | donkey丶

Is this journal open source? What does it mean when it says it supports open source?

(0) 讚！ | one*

Record the submission process
2025.2.17 submit to journal
2025.2.22 with editor
2025.3.1 under review

(0) 讚！ | donkey丶

Only one reviewer, who rejected it directly, and then the editor directly rejected it, without any other reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | TARS

Did you get rejected after the expert gave their opinion, or did it not even get sent for review? The process of this journal seems strange, first getting one approval and receiving feedback, and then sending it for a second review.

(0) 讚！ | 陶瓷气凝胶