I wrote a letter and submitted it to Chemical Communications, but I am anxious to publish it and do not want to wait any longer. I have decided to directly modify and submit it to Materials Letter instead.

Apr 06, 2025 Submit
Apr 08, 2025 With Editor
Apr 10, 2025 Under Review Invited Reviewer 2+*
Apr 11, 2025 Under Review Accepted Reviewer 2
Apr 14, 2025 Under Review Accepted Reviewer 2+*
Looking forward to good news...

(0) 讚！ | HDUer

2025.2.17 submit to journal
2025.2.23 with editor
2025.2.28 under review
2025.3.2 moderate revise
2025.4.1 with editor
2025.4.5 accept

The review process was very quick, with two reviewers for the first round and the editors handling the correspondence very promptly.

(0) 讚！ | donkey丶

2025.2.17 submitted to journal
2025.2.23 with editor
2025.2.28 under review
2025.3.2 moderate revise
2025.3.31 with editor
2025.4.6 accepted 
The review process was fast, with two reviewers providing relatively neutral feedback, and the editor was very friendly.

(0) 讚！ | donkey丶

Yes, the word count should be within 2000 words and should not exceed 8 pages (including references).

(0) 讚！ | saluuu

Hello, may I ask if this journal only accepts articles with a maximum of 2000 words?

(0) 讚！ | 安an

3.12 Submitted
3.14 WE
3.19 UR
3.24 Only one reviewer accepted the review.

(0) 讚！ | saluuu

A very pleasant and efficient submission experience, from submission to acceptance in 37 days.

2025.2.17 submitted
2025.2.24 under review, accepted by 3 reviewers
2025.3.8 major revisions, with a total of 18 comments
2025.3.17 revised
2025.3.26 accepted

(0) 讚！ | Fxiaoduanku

Do we need to undergo another external audit for the rework? My moderately revised work has been sent back for rework and has been in the "with editor" status for over ten days with no progress. I have also sent an email inquiring about it, but have not received a response.

(1) 讚！ | 磕盐达人

2025.2.17 submit to journal
2025.2.23 with editor
2025.2.28 under review
2025.2.2 moderate revise

(0) 讚！ | donkey丶

On March 18, 2025, reviewers provided generally positive feedback and suggestions.

(0) 讚！ | donkey丶

Is this journal open source? What does it mean when it says it supports open source?

(0) 讚！ | one*

Record the submission process
2025.2.17 submit to journal
2025.2.22 with editor
2025.3.1 under review

(0) 讚！ | donkey丶

Only one reviewer, who rejected it directly, and then the editor directly rejected it, without any other reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | TARS

Did you get rejected after the expert gave their opinion, or did it not even get sent for review? The process of this journal seems strange, first getting one approval and receiving feedback, and then sending it for a second review.

(0) 讚！ | 陶瓷气凝胶

Unfortunately, on the tenth day, rejected and speechless.

(0) 讚！ | TARS

How did it turn out? I also provided feedback in the first round, but after the revisions, it was sent to other reviewers for another round of evaluation.

(0) 讚！ | 陶瓷气凝胶

It seems like there is only one review opinion, and after submitting it on the 6th day, it was marked as "Decision in Process." It looks like it's going to be rejected.

(0) 讚！ | TARS

Reviews completed: 1
Review invitations accepted: 1
Review invitations sent: 2+

(0) 讚！ | TARS

Submit an article on 20250208, looking forward to good news.

(0) 讚！ | TARS

2024.12.22 submit to journal
2024.12.24 with editor
2024.12.29 under review
2025.1.24 moderate revise
2025.2.2 submitted to journal
2025.2.3 accept

The submission process has been relatively smooth, with strict formatting requirements and a need for some level of innovation. The criteria for characterization methods are not high. Overall, this submission experience has been quite pleasant compared to previous ones.

(0) 讚！ | 我de豪杰物语

I have been UR for 10 days, and only one person has been reviewing my submission. The editor has not sent out any more invitations, so I don't know what will happen next.

(0) 讚！ | 陶瓷气凝胶

In the first review, there were three reviewers, but after revision, only two were invited.

(0) 讚！ | lili666

How many reviewers do you have? So far, I have only received feedback from one reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | 陶瓷气凝胶

2024.12.6 submitted to journal
2024.12.8 with editor
2024.12.11 under review
2024.12.29 moderate review
2025.1.5 submitted to journal
2025.1.11 under review
2025.1.20 accepted
The processing was very timely, the editor was very friendly, and the paper was accepted after revisions based on the reviewers' feedback.

(0) 讚！ | lili666

Submission experience:
2024.11.20 submitted to journal
2024.11.22 with editor
2024.11.28 under review
2024.12.05 moderate revision
2024.12.30 submitted to journal
2025.01.02 with editor
2025.01.06 accepted
Thanks to the editor, very friendly, high processing efficiency, and very professional review, worth recommending submission!

(0) 讚！ | 高山仰止