期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱![]() | MEASUREMENT LetPub Score 8.1
78 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.2 Influence 8.0 Speed 7.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | MEASUREMENT | ||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0263-2241 | ||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 11.50%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | https://www.journals.elsevier.com/measurement | ||||||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/MEAS | ||||||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Elsevier | ||||||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 工程技术 | ||||||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 隔月刊行 | ||||||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 2226每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 10.29% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0263-2241%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 3.8 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: 33% 來自Elsevier的數據: 37% | ||||||||||||||||||||
在線文章發布時間 | 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 3.5 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[MEASUREMENT] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: 小法师wjl 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-16 23:01:38 評論於 Maybe the allocated AE is different. ![]() ![]() |
作者: Fang Tao 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-16 22:19:34 評論於 It was sent for external review so quickly. I submitted it on September 9th, and now it is still "With Editor." ![]() ![]() |
作者: 小法师wjl 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-16 21:13:38 評論於 9.12 submit & we 9.15 UR 9.15 12 1 0 Invited 12 people in just a moment. ![]() ![]() |
作者: CR的诺爸爸 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-14 20:34:21 評論於 ZC: No need to confirm all. That is for other authors to track the submission process. Whether other authors confirm or not does not affect. ![]() ![]() |
作者: CR的诺爸爸 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-14 20:33:01 評論於 mhnjk: No, my deputy editor is not hesitant. He invites four to five people every day. In total, he invited 12 people. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 八万欧 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-14 19:20:23 評論於 There is only one person in the third review, and he has not reviewed it for 15 days. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 八万欧 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-14 19:17:50 評論於 It's been 15 days and it's still not approved, feeling so anxious! ![]() ![]() |
作者: 学术小白花 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-13 16:13:06 評論於 Still in the "we" group, hoping that the kind-hearted editor will quickly submit for review. Orz. ![]() ![]() |
作者: moa 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-13 08:31:09 評論於 One first round reviewer, two reviewers were invited for the second round. As of the 11th, two reviewers were invited for a second review, but until now, no one has agreed to review. Have they all left? Or have new reviewers been invited again? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 海阔天空 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-12 22:44:01 評論於 This journal normally invites at least 3 reviewers once accepted and does not invite new reviewers. After waiting for a month, the reviewers left, and the editor started to add more. Usually, one or two reviewers are added at a time, with a cycle of five days. I also reminded the editor during this period. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 海阔天空 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-12 22:41:16 評論於 Instead of making everyone confirm, there should be a piece of paper for everyone to write down their contribution. ![]() ![]() |
作者: mhnjk 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-12 16:52:00 評論於 May I ask if you requested the addition of a new reviewer for this first review? I have been waiting for 8-1 months and have not been invited to review by any new reviewers. ![]() ![]() |
作者: zc 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-12 16:24:50 評論於 Do all authors need to confirm before submitting for review in this journal? ![]() ![]() |
作者: zc 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-12 16:18:18 評論於 May I ask, do all authors need to confirm when submitting to this journal? Will the submission process be delayed if not all authors have confirmed? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 海阔天空 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-11 23:54:47 評論於 Additional, on September 12th, under review, only 1 person is invited; should not invite the original 3 reviewers at once (2 major revisions, 1 acceptance, each reviewer has suggestions), if not enough, invite new reviewers. Why only invite 1 person? ![]() ![]() |
作者: Fang Tao 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-11 23:52:52 評論於 25.09.09 提交给期刊 25.09.10 与编辑沟通 ![]() ![]() |
作者: 海阔天空 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-11 23:51:11 評論於 I would like to ask, in the first review there were 2 major revisions and 1 acceptance, and all 3 reviewers provided feedback. Now the second review has started, but only 1 reviewer was invited. Ideally, shouldn't all reviewers be invited since they all have opinions that should be considered? Currently, only 1 reviewer has been invited and I don't understand why. Can anyone explain this? The paper originally had 3 reviewers, but one of them disappeared before the final review, so the editor had to find a replacement which wasted a month. The first review took 20 days for revisions, and an additional 10 days were requested from the editor. ![]() ![]() |
作者: mhnjk 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-11 15:34:14 評論於 Hello, is the increase in your submissions due to pressure from the editorial department? ![]() ![]() |
作者: mhnjk 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-11 15:31:15 評論於 Hello, out of the eight manuscripts I submitted, only one reviewer accepted and completed the review. It was 8-1-1. Did you remind the editorial department to send more reviewers at that time? ![]() ![]() |
作者: CR的诺爸爸 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-11 11:09:39 評論於 We went through about 3 and a half months. The reviewer was super fast, the editor was a bit slow, the associate editor was quick, and the editor-in-chief was extremely slow. We received a decision after 28 days of submission, urging did not work, and it took 12 days to make a decision. The day after urging, the submission was accepted in the morning. ![]() ![]() |
作者: CR的诺爸爸 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-11 11:04:35 評論於 Continued update 25.8.22 RSTJ on the same day WE 25.8.29 DIP was decided by the editor without reviewer 25.9.10 Accept ![]() ![]() |
作者: zc 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-11 10:55:46 評論於 Mine too, didn't it say just 2 weeks above? ![]() ![]() |
作者: zzyymm 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-10 10:09:03 評論於 Please translate the following paragraph into English: 9.10 RRC 22-3-3 ![]() ![]() |
作者: 学术小白花 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-09 16:38:27 評論於 The third review has been two weeks and it hasn't been submitted for review yet. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 追逐影的人 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-09 14:28:56 評論於 I am too, it has been almost a month and I am still editing it, not submitting for review. ![]() ![]() |
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us