Measurement is not a very fast journal, and the style of the journal has always been rigorous.

Submitted to the journal on May 9, 2025
May 15, 2025 6/0/0
May 15, 2025 6/1/1
May 15, 2025 9/1/1
May 17, 2025 10/1/1
May 20, 2025 11/1/1
May 21, 2025 12/1/1
June 4, 2025 18/1/1
June 5, 2025 19/1/1
June 8, 2025 19/2/1
June 9, 2025 19/3/1
Continuing...

(0) 讚！ | 数据真实可靠

In the first review, there were four reviewers, with major revisions suggested. After resubmitting on May 19, 2025, two reviewers provided quick feedback, while the other two reviewers accepted the manuscript but did not provide any results. Suddenly, on June 14, 2025, the status changed to RRC. What is going on? Can someone please guide me? I don't want to be rejected.

(0) 讚！ | xiao

2025/5/28 提交
2025/5/29 我们
2025/6/13 审核中

(0) 讚！ | 成功人士小李

There is one more that is not yet completed.

(0) 讚！ | 万万6

I would like to ask Wan Wan 6, have both of your reviewers completed the review?

(0) 讚！ | lyx_1

One day earlier than the host, in with the editor.

(0) 讚！ | Honglei Ma

I have contacted Elsevier customer service once, and it took more than a week to receive a response.

(0) 讚！ | 学术小白花

I haven't looked at this edit for a long time and I haven't invited any new reviewers either.

(0) 讚！ | 万万6

2025/6/12 With Editor

(0) 讚！ | studyyyyyyyy

Excuse me, everyone, for this first round of review, three reviewers have suggested major revisions. Two of them have completed the second round of reviews, but the third reviewer has not started reviewing yet. It has been more than 20 days. What should we do?

(0) 讚！ | 如生命般费解的谜团

I did not write any improvement points related to measurements, but I did write about how to modify the manuscript based on the feedback from each reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | 学术小白花

There are two possibilities. One is that for a long time, only two people review and approve the manuscript, and if the opinions of the two people are consistent, then the opinions of the two reviewers will be returned. The second possibility is that based on my experience, if there are two Chinese editors, the manuscript will be returned, but if there are foreign editors, they will continue inviting a third reviewer. For reference only.

(0) 讚！ | 学术小白花

Why can't I bind the official account?

(0) 讚！ | Good on

Just submitted yesterday, recording the status:
2025/6/11 Submit

(0) 讚！ | studyyyyyyyy

You can follow the official WeChat account of iThinkTank. There is more detailed information on the articles there.

(0) 讚！ | 王蔚染

The manuscript has been under review for over ten days, with the dates being changed twice. However, the status has always shown "Review invitations sent: 2+". I would like to ask if anyone knows what "2+" means? I see that everyone else has a specific number of reviewers invited and it keeps increasing. In my case, "2+" cannot possibly mean that only 2 reviewers have been invited. 
Reviews completed: 0
Review invitations accepted: 0
Review invitations sent: 2+

(0) 讚！ | 海阔天空

Have you included any points about improvements in Measurement in your cover letter? I wrote a cover letter, but the editor said it wasn't appropriate and sent it back.

(0) 讚！ | ooapaqi

Is it acceptable for this journal to have two reviewers for the first round of review?

(0) 讚！ | 万万6

Thank God.

(0) 讚！ | 学术小白花

07394了

It is completed.

(0) 讚！ | Honglei Ma

I invested in 18we on 5.17. Yesterday, 6.10, the date changed but the status remained the same, still we.

(0) 讚！ | 啊六三

May I ask if the resubmission of a rejected manuscript will be sent back to the original reviewer?

(0) 讚！ | accept_小狗

6000+

(0) 讚！ | 科研死狗

2025-6-10  0-2-36,

(0) 讚！ | aaaasadasda

25.03.01 Submit
25.03.03 With editor
25.03.03 Under review
Niche direction, with over 30 reviewers contacted, the editor is working very hard!
25.05.10 Major - three weeks
25.05.28 Submit
25.06.09 Accept
Unexpectedly quick (๑•̀ㅂ•́)و✧

(0) 讚！ | 老鸽子