Message the editor, saying that you are looking for a second reviewer. May I ask if the previous one has disappeared? It's been almost three months waiting.

(0) 讚！ | accept1111111

Very fast!
April 17th submit
May 19th Major revisions required
June 3rd return manuscript
June 13th provisionally accepting
Received comments from three reviewers,
Because the comments from the second reviewer were very positive and recommended me some articles. So the editor found a third reviewer, whose comments were all very constructive! Thanks for the help!!

(0) 讚！ | 我想发SCI

The first reviewer will send the revised report to the editor, who will then wait to make a decision on whether to continue with the review process or provide the outcome. How long this process takes and if any experienced authors have insights to share on this?

(0) 讚！ | healer151

Can I submit the article in single-column format?

(0) 讚！ | Han Lv

How long have you been investing to become like this?

(0) 讚！ | momo

Which direction are you in? Have you heard any news?

(0) 讚！ | momo

6.11投出 - Record it.

(0) 讚！ | 灵兰QAQ

Has anyone encountered the need to fill out the Permissions Spreadsheet form? How do you fill it out?

(0) 讚！ | 晓麟

Did you send an email to the editor? Any news?

(0) 讚！ | lv杰杰

What format do you need for the references? I didn't see any requirements for the format in the guidelines. Why were you rejected because of the references issue?

(0) 讚！ | 灵兰QAQ

Received the major overhaul, given about four weeks of time.

(0) 讚！ | Anchovyyyy

Hey guys, this is my current status, what does it mean?

(0) 讚！ | 不知

Can anyone tell me what does the status "Draft" mean in this journal?

(0) 讚！ | 不知

In the field of CV, after major revisions, the key milestones are as follows for your reference: 
- Submitted on February 13, 2025 
- Received notification for major revisions on April 25, 2025, with 28 days given 
- Resubmitted revised version on May 22, 2025 
- Provisionally accepted on June 3, 2025 
- Formally accepted on June 9, 2025 

The review comments were relatively professional, with the first reviewer providing 4 manageable suggestions. The second reviewer had 10 more challenging suggestions, which were addressed by supplementing experiments and citing two of his papers as suggested. The final manuscript was 23 pages long, with revision comments spanning 26 pages.

(1) 讚！ | 北野千尘

Can anyone share the same situation as me? I submitted the article on May 13th, it was sent for review a week later. Recently, the public account showed that the first reviewer had started reviewing. However, in the past few days, the public account again displayed that it was sent to the reviewer. What is this situation? Are they looking for a new reviewer? Has it been resubmitted for review? The public account has been showing "Awaiting Referee Reports" all along.

(0) 讚！ | will

I would like to ask how long it will take for the 5.18 submission to be decided. Will reviewers be invited for further review? (feeling like it might be rejected)

(0) 讚！ | Anchovyyyy

I also found an issue that the reference generated by the LaTeX template he provided does not include the journal name, only the book does. I don't understand.

(0) 讚！ | wecwecwec

Can I submit directly using the IEEE LaTeX template?

(0) 讚！ | yyyyyu

May I ask, if the reviewer for the second round of review disappears, will the editor keep following up or find a new reviewer?

(0) 讚！ | lv杰杰

It feels like the reviewer has run away.

(0) 讚！ | Lum0sW

May I ask why the manuscript was sent back for revisions? Initially, it showed as being sent to the reviewer, but recently the manuscript tracking system suddenly changed to the status of revisions. The submission website still shows "awaiting referee report". Did the reviewer disappear?

(0) 讚！ | lv杰杰

It has been more than two months now, and still no news.

(0) 讚！ | accept1111111

Did you email the editor to ask? Mine is also in this situation, it's been two weeks and it hasn't changed yet, does this mean it has been re-submitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | yyyyj

Just changed, submitted for review.

(0) 讚！ | Weiduanduan

The group cannot be searched.

(0) 讚！ | HsiaoTung