| 期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY LetPub Score 7.9
57 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.3 Influence 7.4 Speed 9.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 期刊簡稱 | MECH MACH THEORY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 0094-114X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| h-index | 96 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 自引率 (2023-2024) | 15.60%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 官方網站 | http://www.journals.elsevier.com/mechanism-and-machine-theory/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/MECHMT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版商 | Elsevier Ltd | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 主題領域 | 工程技术 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版國/地區 | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 發行頻率 | 月刊 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 創刊年 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 每年文章數 | 232每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 黃金OA百分比 | 15.89% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0094-114X%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 2.0 month(s) 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 11.3 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: Easy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 在線文章發布時間 | 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 4 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| *所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
| [MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
| 作者: dihy516 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-13 21:09:07 評論於 Please submit on April 13, 2026. April 13, 2026 WE |
| 作者: ZnMNCr 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-07 00:01:12 評論於 There is some ambiguity in what was said, with three reviewers accepting the manuscript and two reviewers providing feedback on 3.1. |
| 作者: ZnMNCr 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-06 23:59:46 評論於 Three reviewers accepted, 3.1 two reviewers entered the RRC stage after revisions, and by 3.6 they are still in the RRC stage, waiting for the third reviewer. |
| 作者: 凉水泡茶 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-05 12:38:40 評論於 First submission Oct 08, 2025 Rejected Oct 09, 2025 due to language issues Resubmission Oct 22, 2025 Rejected Nov 25, 2025 with 7 reviewers, major revisions requested. Too many comments, editor requested resubmission Third submission Feb 01, 2026 Minor revisions Feb 28, 2026 with 5 reviewers, 4 accepted, 1 minor revision Revisions Mar 03, 2026 Accepted Mar 03, 2026 |
| 作者: 懒擦嘿 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-02-27 19:35:53 評論於 Congratulations! Soak up the good luck! |
| 作者: zpf123 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-02-10 10:05:33 評論於 Could you please help check why the system is showing an error message when trying to submit the manuscript after adding the author roles? How can we resolve this issue? |
| 作者: 懒擦嘿 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-12-22 14:02:22 評論於 Congratulations! Good luck and good fortune! |
| 作者: 懒擦嘿 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-11-27 10:21:50 評論於 Congratulations! Enjoy the good luck! |
| 作者: 懒擦嘿 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-11-27 10:20:31 評論於 Soak up the joy!!! |
| 作者: 懒擦嘿 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-11-26 21:43:04 評論於 Is the big shot MMT now changing to double-blind? |
| 作者: yuecy22 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-11-17 01:24:30 評論於 Decisions for submissions are all rejections in one day, and it usually takes several days for us to send an article for review. |
| 作者: shabaihua 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-10-22 21:18:55 評論於 High efficiency, objective evaluation, and fair results. Generally, the results are provided within two months with feedback from around three reviewers. |
| 作者: Valender 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-25 00:13:37 評論於 Today received, the first reviewer did not accept the manuscript, the second reviewer did not take it. |
| 作者: Valender 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-15 10:17:52 評論於 Is it so bad? I have to give one of the three a major overhaul, that rejected one is just one sentence, not innovative. |
| 作者: yufanhe 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-12 09:34:52 評論於 In theory, the first decision should be made within one day. In the past, submissions have also received initial review results within one day. However, it has been two days now and it is still "with editor". The status has been updated, indicating that it has been reviewed during this time. I don't know why the initial review results have not been released yet. |
| 作者: 努力搬砖 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-08 16:48:23 評論於 I submitted my manuscript half a month ago, sending it to 19 reviewers. 12 of them accepted to review it. Currently, 4 reviewers have completed their reviews, while the manuscript is still under review by others. |
| 作者: David 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-07 21:37:33 評論於 Last time I sent 12, 9 were accepted and 3 were rejected. This time I sent 18, the editor is really generous in accepting them. |
| 作者: 接accept 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-17 15:41:38 評論於 Hello, may I ask if MMT is currently using double-blind review for submissions? The official website states single-blind review, but the submission website seems to require double-blind review. |
| 作者: 接accept 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-17 15:40:24 評論於 Hello, I would like to ask if the submission process for mmt is currently double-blind peer reviewed? The official website states single-blind review, but the submission portal seems to require double-blind review. |
| 作者: 殃及池鱼 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-14 22:08:20 評論於 2025.2.20 with editor 2025.2.20 Under review(8/20) 2025.4.3 Reject and major revision 2025.5.29 With editor 2025.5.30 Under Review 2025.6.20 Major revision 2025.6.30 Under Review 2025.7.7 Minor revision 2025.7.8 With editor 2025.7.8 Accept |
| 作者: 嘻嘻哈哈 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-10 08:47:26 評論於 We are still in the hands of the editor, not yet invited. It is possible to be rejected or sent for review. MMT efficiency is still very fast. |
| 作者: 阿俊冲 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 12.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-29 11:54:18 評論於 Hello, bro, does it mean that after editing, we will go directly to the under reviewer? Does this mean that the with editor stage is when we invite reviewers? |
| 作者: 阿俊冲 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 12.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-29 11:51:15 評論於 Hello, have you been with the editor for so long? What is the current status? Is this process about finding reviewers? |
| 作者: 嘻嘻哈哈 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-27 09:00:10 評論於 This journal focuses more on theory, but of course, if your application is valuable enough and the author lineup is strong, it is also possible. |
| 作者: 阿俊冲 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 12.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-13 11:02:15 評論於 Hello, can I send an email? Is there still a chance? I was also rejected instantly, they said the theory was not new enough. This journal seems to have very high standards for theoretical innovation. |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
Contact us