The job is fine, but the impact factor is even worse than the stocks I bought. It dropped again this year, and I don't think it will rise back up.

(0) 讚！ | Ravenop

Which editor is assigned? Is the editor strict in reviewing?

(0) 讚！ | sherry chen

Received revision suggestions on June 12, 2025, both reviewers suggested minor revisions which are very helpful. The editor requested to return the revised version before June 25th.

(0) 讚！ | Jackson_M

It has been 20 days since submission, but it has not been reviewed yet.

(0) 讚！ | 111111234

It took about 5 days to receive it, and it has been sent for external review, but there is still no news.

(0) 讚！ | Jackson_M

How are you now, my very slowly.

(0) 讚！ | Yuzhihua_2025

I am also this editor, it has been 14 days and the editing has not been processed.

(0) 讚！ | 111111234

May I ask everyone how is the speed of Jennifer A. Dionne handling manuscripts as an editor?

(0) 讚！ | 111111234

Which editor are you?

(0) 讚！ | 111111234

Not very fast, when submitted at the end of March, it was still in the first district. After the review comments came back, it became the second district. It took nearly two months to supplement the experiments after the review comments came back. The impact factor has been continuously declining in recent years, and I don't know if it can still recover.

(0) 讚！ | Ravenop

Submission on 25th April 2025
Assigned editor Benjamin Tee on 1st May 2025
Has anyone experienced the processing speed of this editor? Thank you for sharing!

(0) 讚！ | Jackson_M

1.30 Submission
2.05 Assignment to editor
2.19 Sent for review
3.04 Major revisions, 2 minor revisions, 1 rejection
3.25 Revised
4.14 Minor revisions, 1 minor revision, 2 remaining minor issues
4.18 Revised
4.24 Accepted
The total time taken was 84 days, which is relatively smooth, but there were many waiting periods that were quite long, such as waiting for 2 weeks for the associate editor to send for review, and waiting for 1 week for acceptance of the minor revisions.

(0) 讚！ | Minamoto

Will the review committee receive an email notification after the modifications are made?

(0) 讚！ | qq572020211

Be careful, the leader wants to talk to you.

(0) 讚！ | qq572020211

Did the corresponding author not receive the submission email?

(0) 讚！ | qq572020211

Will send an email to the corresponding author to notify them of the submission for review.

(0) 讚！ | qq572020211

The feedback has come back, with revisions suggested. The reviewer is really something, providing over 40 suggestions. My brain can hardly keep up.

(0) 讚！ | qq572020211

One less journal in the field of physics that can be submitted to. Originally, the order of submission was NC, PRL, Optica, Nano Letters, then downgraded to LPR, ACS Photonics, and AOM. Now Nano Letters is no longer an option. For engineering applications in optics, only Optica and ACS Photonics are available for submission. The domestic journals with impact factors above 10 are not interested in my articles.

(1) 讚！ | keyanyaojiayou

Professional physics. My impression has always been that it is a very good article. Just a week ago, it was ranked as the second tier. Nano Research is back to the top tier, I understand that. But one step forward, one step back, I don't understand. What's even more puzzling is that the sub-journals of Nano Research have all become top tier. Ah, the Chinese Academy of Sciences Library is really... amazing.

(0) 讚！ | 啊小骗子

My assignment is to be allocated to Wang Haotian, two reviewers, one small and one large, and then accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 岳麓山学僧

How do I know when it's ready for submission?

(0) 讚！ | 骑猪去旅行1249