Received proof on 26th April, and online on 14th April.

(0) 讚！ | AAAwen

Is there any progress now?

(0) 讚！ | www.

My WE has been 5 weeks already, too slow.

(0) 讚！ | www.

Hello, did the second review come back with some minor changes, so it was not sent to the reviewer for the third review?

(0) 讚！ | Guohua Song

Hello, may I ask if the minor issues that were revised in the second review were not sent to the reviewers for the third review?

(0) 讚！ | Guohua Song

Proof doesn't have much to do with editing, right?

(0) 讚！ | AAAwen

I mean, there is no proofreader upstairs and Hongyang Dong isn't replying, is it?

(0) 讚！ | IIvy

Who is your editor? Can they see this?

(0) 讚！ | IIvy

From December 25, 2028 to March 27, 2026, it has been three months and I still have not received the proof. I sent an email inquiring about it but have not received a response.

(0) 讚！ | AAAwen

The first reviewer delayed for 6 months, the second review has been submitted, and now it has been 3 months since the technical review. The editor has not sent it for review yet, despite reminding twice with no response or explanation. Is this right? The first reviewer should be Hongyang Dong.

(0) 讚！ | IIvy

Congratulations on ND returning to the Top of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

(0) 讚！ | minghe

In my second review, there are only two reviewers, while in the first review there were three reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | tr

May I ask how many reviewers are usually involved in the first review process? I submitted my manuscript to 4 reviewers, but so far only 2 have provided feedback. It has been more than 40 days and I have not received all the first review comments yet.

(0) 讚！ | AAAyyyqqq

Worst journal (especially the time series special issue). Rejected based on ONE incompetent reviewer who evaluated a completely different math model than my manuscript. It reads like a hallucinated AI response. What destroys their credibility is that the Editor-in-Chief blindly accepted this factually incorrect review without checking a single equation. I submitted a formal appeal proving the math error, but they completely ignored me, wasting 6 months of my time. Avoid Nonlinear Dynamics!

(0) 讚！ | Dr. Toufik

The submission to acceptance process takes about six months in total, with major revisions required before acceptance. The timeline is as follows:

(0) 讚！ | tr

Can you confirm if it has been proved now?

(0) 讚！ | 一头肉熊

The latest update, last week online. Accept to proof takes two months, proof to online takes one and a half months. The journal is undergoing a technological transformation, so it is normal for the process to take longer. No need to worry too much.

(0) 讚！ | hihxiosxb

I have been employed for a whole month, but I have not received any messages about proof or anything like that.

(0) 讚！ | 一头肉熊

I have been employed for half a month and still have not received any proof.

(0) 讚！ | Su

Is there any progress? This journal used to be quite fast, why has it been taking so long to edit now?

(0) 讚！ | 夏雨

How long did it take for your hire to be confirmed?

(0) 讚！ | 一头肉熊

It's been almost half a month with the editor, and there has been no progress.

(0) 讚！ | 夏雨

20250219 Submitted
20250221 Desk Reject

(0) 讚！ | UFFR347

I would like to ask everyone, the proof sent in mid-December has been submitted for a month, but still not online and no news, what is the situation?

(0) 讚！ | hihxiosxb

I received it in December last year, it has been four weeks now and I have not received the proof email yet.

(0) 讚！ | 黑夜中的星辰