Brother, may I ask what your direction is?

(0) 讚！ | 学术垃圾制造者

So annoying... After two rounds, they finally said the paper was not suitable. It seems that the journal has just been used for internal digestion and self-entertainment.

(0) 讚！ | zbh2838158

Question: "The references cited in the article can already support the argument of my article. After three rounds of peer review, no experts have raised objections about the appropriateness of the reference discipline.

Does the submission instructions of your journal specify that references should come from the field of nuclear science and technology? Moreover, my article also cites 7 nuclear field journals such as Nucl. Technol. Syst., Nucl. Sci. Tech., NUCL INSTRUM METH A, Int. J. Energy Res, Prog. Nucl. Energy. And since you say there is no requirement for proportion, on what grounds do you judge that the references I cited are not appropriate?

If you think that the research field of my article does not match the submission guidelines of your journal, why not point it out at the initial submission stage or during the first round of review?"

No response received.

Having revised three times in over five months, it was all in vain. Everyone, be cautious, as it is an extreme waste of time for research personnel.

(1) 讚！ | Liu12345678

Email inquiry, received a reply:
"NST is not a comprehensive journal, and its subject classification in the web of science is Physics-nuclear and Nuclear Science & Technology. The references in the paper should belong to these two subject classifications, not other fields."

Question: "Are you suggesting that I should change the references? What should be the proportion of references in the categories of Physics-nuclear and Nuclear Science & Technology?"

Reply: "It's not about replacing references, but actually looking through them to ensure they are reliable. There is no requirement for a specific proportion, as submissions in the field of nuclear science and technology come from these two areas."

(0) 讚！ | Liu12345678

Submitted on 18-May-2024, major revision due on 12-Jun-2024
Revised on 09-Aug-2024, minor revision due on 02-Sep-2024
Revised on 15-Sep-2024, minor revision due on 23-Sep-2024
Revised on 14-Oct-2024, editor returned with a request to submit to a journal related to nuclear technology
Revised on 16-Oct-2024, editor returned with a request to resubmit

(0) 讚！ | Liu12345678

Try submitting and see how it goes, after all, it's still a district, which is very useful for the evaluation of green peppers. Requiring LaTex submissions, although not explicitly stated in the guidelines. I was not asked to add references during editing and initial review, but I originally cited nearly ten NST articles, although the proportion of Chinese authors should not be particularly high.

(1) 讚！ | 渐度

The self-citation rate is a terrifying 39.30%! Why doesn't the Chinese Academy of Sciences warn its own journals??

(3) 讚！ | 编号89757

Domestic journals are unbearable, forcing authors to add references or else their papers will not be reviewed. The reviewing process is slow. If you truly want to pursue research, it's better not to submit to these journals

(0) 讚！ | 三丫

Impact factor 2.8, self-citation rate 39%, first-tier journal. Those who know, know

(1) 讚！ | RSVH

Most people quickly underestimate and fall into the pit

(22) 讚！ | lucky_mia

May I ask if I choose non-open source, do I still need to pay for the layout? How much is it?

(0) 讚！ | dingzan

An SCI paper has been submitted to NST. The editor of this journal is the most conscientious and responsible one I have ever seen. The opinions given by the reviewers are also very professional and detailed, greatly improving the quality of the manuscript. I believe that this journal will continue to get better and better.

(12) 讚！ | heze

Do you need to pay a layout fee for subscribing to the publication of NST articles instead of open source?

(0) 讚！ | 猎涉者

After cooperating with Springer, publishing has become more and more standardized, the speed of review and online have been improved, and the impact factor has also been steadily improved. I hope the journal will become better and better!

(2) 讚！ | ct97

The journal accepts a lot of papers in this field.

(1) 讚！ | GIGI

New research results of Shanghai Light Source, very fast processing

(0) 讚！ | John

The new research results of Shanghai Light Source, very fast processing

(0) 讚！ | John

There are foreign reviewers involved in the review, the opinions are very targeted,

(0) 讚！ | honeymelon

"Nuclear Science and Techniques", "Nuclear Technology" (English version) is an academic journal sponsored by the Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and co-organized by the Chinese Nuclear Society and the Shanghai Nuclear Society.The publication was published in 1990 and has been published for two months since 2004.As the only English-language journal in the field of nuclear research in China, the review of Nuclear Science and Techniques uses peer-reviewed methods to publish a new generation of synchrotron radiation technology and applications; low-energy accelerator technology, ray technology and applications; low-energy accelerator technology,Ray technology and applications; nuclear chemistry, radiochemistry, radiopharmaceuticals and nuclear medicine; nuclear electronics and instruments

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

professional requirement, high quality, high referencepaper.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名