The newly added reviewer has not made any progress in reviewing for ten days... Please, please do not reject me, please do not reject me.

(0) 讚！ | PriscillaS

Brother, I just finished my five-day quarantine. How are you now? Have you been sent for review?

(0) 讚！ | Krystal

I would like to inquire if anyone has encountered this situation before. The first reviewer has completed the review two months ago, but we have not been able to find a second reviewer yet. Emails have been sent through the system, but it seems like they have been ignored. Is there any solution to this issue? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 之南让星

It is suggested that you attach a separate reply letter, as it may not be practical to include images of typed formulas in the system.

(0) 讚！ | Solomon

It's over, 4-22 Accept, almost over 5 months.

(0) 讚！ | Solomon

Blessings to all!

(0) 讚！ | Glrui

Brother G, I think the person who finished reviewing in three days is a bit unreliable. The person who rejected me in the first round finished reviewing in just one day. Having three reviewers is beneficial for you, as long as the other two are reliable. Good luck!

(0) 讚！ | PriscillaS

Frog Fun, the first round of four reviewers!!!

(0) 讚！ | Glrui

Boss, in my first round of invitations, I invited 5 reviewers. Initially, two accepted and one completed the review in three days. Then, one more person accepted the review the next day! How come there are always three reviewers in the first round?

(0) 讚！ | Glrui

I guess it might be hard to find reviewers, so I'll give you some feedback first and then wait for other reviewers slowly.

(0) 讚！ | PriscillaS

At the end of the email was: Dr. Tahsin Tezdogan didn't let me conduct the experiment, there was just a figure from a paper, a very small subfigure. I drew it using Visio at the time, but it should have been a bit larger, which led to a misunderstanding of the network paths and channels. Then there were problems with the overall structure of the paper, nothing else.

(0) 讚！ | 理工大小钱

Another new reviewer has accepted the review on 2025.04.18. Now there are a total of four reviewers. Brother from the science and engineering field, I think the editor-in-chief might be trying to speed up the process. Who is your editor-in-chief?

(0) 讚！ | PriscillaS

Why do I only have one reviewer? And I feel like this reviewer didn't understand my article... They asked for revisions, but the email said to upload them and a new reviewer will be assigned.

(0) 讚！ | 理工大小钱

Huh? I'm still at 4.4 rating even after all the votes I've cast.

(0) 讚！ | popopopoboboob

Record the submission time
4.16 submit
4.16 with editor
4.17 under review

(0) 讚！ | 粥壹

The reviewer who received it on April 16, 2025 has completed the review. Hopefully it's not a rejection. Please, please. God bless.

(0) 讚！ | PriscillaS

When did you get instantly rejected after submitting your application? I submitted mine on the 4th and still haven't heard back, it's frustrating.

(0) 讚！ | popopopoboboob

Boss, I was also rejected by the editor in seconds, saying it did not meet the scope of the journal. Can you submit it for review after doing this?

(0) 讚！ | BOLIN CHEN

2025.04.14 under review, send 6 and pick 1
Hoping for good news! There have been too many worrying things lately, but I still need to maintain a positive attitude. It's okay to feel sad, anxious, and discouraged, but I must not lose hope! I also hope that everyone who submitted their work will be accepted smoothly!

(2) 讚！ | PriscillaS

Return to revision after one and a half months.

(0) 讚！ | chestnutmomo

It's been five days and it's still WE. Is that considered slow?

(0) 讚！ | qutsjz

2025.4.7 First trial returned for revision with editor
2025.4.11 Currently still in with editor

After returning the revision to the editor, why hasn't it been sent to the two review experts yet?

(1) 讚！ | 祷告

2025.0410 Still with editor. Hope for a change soon, please.

(0) 讚！ | PriscillaS

2025.04.08 Revised, with editor

(0) 讚！ | PriscillaS

On February 25, rc gave 20 days for revisions, and the feedback provided was very constructive, not difficult to implement.
On March 16, revisions were submitted and received with a score of 2-0-0.
On March 18, the score was 2-1-0.
On March 20, the score was 2-2-1.
On March 26, the final revised manuscript received a score of 2-2-2 from rrc.
On April 6, the manuscript was accepted.
Encountered editors and reviewers who are both compassionate and efficient!

(0) 讚！ | 呆呆呆的