I have encountered this type of multiple assignment editing before, where the editor-in-charge would pass on the feedback to the chief editor, who would then decide whether to submit it for review.

(0) 讚！ | yewang

What does this mean? Can I ask?

(0) 讚！ | Miraitowa!

6.7 Submitted; Failed quality check on 9th; Resubmitted on 10th; Assigned editor and sent for review on 11th; All reviewers finished scoring on 7.5, system showed Major Revisions, system cannot see reviewer comments; Received email on 7th requesting return within 10 days; Submitted revised manuscript on 16th; Accepted in the early hours of the 17th. The second OL, love the speed.

(0) 讚！ | 条纹狗

Final Manuscript Decision 07 July 2026 07 July 2026 Manuscript Accepted
Author Revision 29 June 2026 07 July 2026 Author Revisions Complete

First Manuscript Decision 26 June 2026 26 June 2026 Major Revisions Required
Rate Reviewers 26 June 2026 26 June 2026 Reviewer Rating Completed
Peer Review 16 April 2026 26 June 2026 Peer Review Complete
Assign Editor 16 April 2026 16 April 2026 Editor Assigned
Resubmit Manuscript 15 April 2026 submission Complete

(0) 讚！ | 我不是刊神（博士生版）

Submitted on June 5th, final preproduction review on July 7th. This magazine is really efficient and nice. It is the top choice for short and efficient work.

(0) 讚！ | 妙蛙种子2022

Hello, I am also in this situation, it has been going on for a week, but I still haven't seen the reviewer. Is your manuscript currently under external review?

(0) 讚！ | dapigukeji

There is no need to rush, the subsequent editing was directly decided based on the opinion of one reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | hengheng12

In the same situation, may I ask about the progress of the follow-up review and if it needs to be expedited?

(0) 讚！ | 达芬奇402

Submitted for a week and rejected, I decided to submit to their subsidiary Optics Continuum. The efficiency is indeed impressive, but the rejection reasons are quite ordinary and there are even grammar errors. I suggest looking at other journals for submission, as it is not easy.

(0) 讚！ | yangjianyu

It takes about two months from submission to final acceptance, mainly due to the time spent on peer review.

(0) 讚！ | PLZZZ

Pretty fast, isn't it? It usually takes editors around 1 day to peer review.

(0) 讚！ | 橘子橙x

The peer review has been ongoing for over a month now, with no progress.

(0) 讚！ | 王星云

Older established journals are not slow, they might catch up with fewer submissions during the Chinese New Year.
2026.1.8 submit
2026.1.27 peer review took two rounds of reviewers to find
2026.2.9 Major revision
2026.2.18 Revision Complete
2026.2.22 Manuscript Accepted

(0) 讚！ | Justin Wei

Is OL slower now? It has been in the editor's hands for over a month and there is still no external review feedback.

(0) 讚！ | Allewin

The quality check has been ongoing for a week. It may be due to the backlog of this journal. The last round of reviews took over two months, with one reviewer agreeing to review but not submitting. This time, the quality check has been ongoing for a week and has not been approved yet.

(0) 讚！ | PLZZZ

You are absolutely right, buddy.

(0) 讚！ | Weirdoo

I also haven't received any emails, what's going on? Have you received the email in the end?

(0) 讚！ | 小猫

That's okay, just wait a little longer. I waited for 10 days at the time.

(0) 讚！ | Yufeng

After the initial review, the result was that the manuscript was accepted, but it has been stuck in the Preproduction Review stage for four or five days now. Isn't this just about organizing the comments from the reviewers and editors and sending them back to the author via email? Why hasn't there been any progress for several days?

(0) 讚！ | miracle37

Before sending the manuscript for the second review, the original reviewer has been showing "waiting due", will the review be delayed if the reviewer does not accept it?

(0) 讚！ | hengheng12

It's no use resisting, just accept it. From now on, all the manuscripts will be submitted to COL.

(0) 讚！ | 石榴dady

ZKY is awesome, if you don't believe it, you're missing out. Once you believe it, that's the way to go. All future submissions should be sent to COL.

(0) 讚！ | 石榴dady

No, I'm looking for a reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | 橘子橙x

Two minor revisions were requested, but the editor rejected them directly. The rejection felt a bit like nitpicking, with various experiments to supplement the length of the article.

(0) 讚！ | NiuHF

Will the submission be rejected directly by the editor if there is no information about the reviewers after ten days in the peer review process?

(0) 讚！ | hengheng12