Convert the maked version into a PDF, and then choose "marked up" when uploading. That's all you need to do. I had the same issue and had to email for help to find out.

(0) 讚！ | Wayne

May I ask if you have solved it now?

(0) 讚！ | songlin zhu

After receiving the review results, the page for submitting documents now allows you to select "Revised manuscript (marked up)", but after submitting, the corresponding option does not appear in the submitted documents below, resulting in the inability to complete the submission of this document.

(0) 讚！ | 星星球

We submitted the paper for review 24 days ago, but after reading other people's reviews, we decided to withdraw the submission. It's too scary.

(0) 讚！ | VingeGOD

Actually, it's just that the editor saw that two reviewers agreed to publish, and then found a third person whose opinions aligned with their own, and wrote a bunch of comments. Since I didn't choose to pay the publication fee, I just rejected it. Why make it so complicated, just reject it directly.

(0) 讚！ | 做某人学历最高的粉丝

In the first review, both experts recommended major revisions. In the second review, one expert agreed to publish, while another expert made a suggestion. I revised the manuscript to 10 pages and submitted it for a third review. The second expert agreed to publish, but the editor sought a third expert who provided conflicting suggestions with the second expert, criticizing the page layout. The editor sided with the third reviewer, citing poor writing and too many pages, and ultimately rejected the manuscript.

(0) 讚！ | 做某人学历最高的粉丝

Full throttle

(0) 讚！ | songlin zhu

It has been over ten days and it's still WE.

(0) 讚！ | huoda.123

submit: 2025.6.8
with editor: 2025.6.8
under review: 2025.6.14, editor sends to 2+ reviewers; 2025.6.16, 2+ reviewers agree to review, 1 reviewer completes review.

(0) 讚！ | 旧日浮沉

I don't know where to check the progress from.

(0) 讚！ | Yifen

12.19 urgent submission, received on the same day.

(0) 讚！ | 阿拉斯加

11.29 One reviewer has completed the review, while another has not yet accepted the invitation for review.

(0) 讚！ | 阿拉斯加

submit: 10.15
with editor: 10.18
under review: 10.22
major revision: 11.2 Editor sent to eight reviewers, received two responses, totaling 15 comments, some overlapping
revised: 11.18
under review: 11.22 Outcome unknown, hoping for good luck

(0) 讚！ | 阿拉斯加

Submission: 1.27
With editor: 2.5
Under review: 2.9
Revised: 5.9
Accepted: 5.29
Published: 6.1
The review process was okay, it took a total of five months from submission to acceptance.

(0) 讚！ | 螃蟹的腿毛

Not recommended for submission, the editor is extremely lazy and the review process is very long. On average, an invitation for review is sent every two months, and it can take up to six months for a review invitation to be extended. No one accepts the invitations each time. Minor revisions are required for resubmission, and the editor lacks any judgment ability. I admit defeat this time, if I am rejected, I will immediately submit elsewhere, it's too terrifying.

It's already 24-5-29 and there is still no information on invited reviewers. Sending a reminder email resulted in a generic response from the journal system. The editor is Tunna Baruah, an incompetent Indian

(0) 讚！ | CyCy!!!

It's been 5 months and not a single reviewer has accepted. I'm so frustrated. I only invited 6 in total

(0) 讚！ | 2023mjl

Hello friend, I wanted to ask who the reviewer is that Xiaoni picked

(0) 讚！ | 八爪鱼。

Received 19 September 2023, Revised 7 December 2023, Accepted 17 December 2023, Available online 19 December 2023.
Unfortunately, after being rejected by JMMM, it was resubmitted to Physic B Condensed Matter. Despite some setbacks, it was accepted in the end

(0) 讚！ | 王珂

submitted to journal 2023.10.18
with editor 2023.10.19
under review 2023.10.22
minor revise 2023.11.20
recision submitted to journal 2023.12.01
with editor 2023.12.02
under review 2023.12.06
accept 2023.12.17

审稿人是Hong Zhang Editor，非常的负责和专业。一审不到一个月，非常快。两个审稿人一个接受，一个给了四条意见的小修，给了20天修改。基本上没啥大问题，十天就修改完毕，返给编辑了。本以为会直接小修之后accept，结果编辑大大给送审了，真的非常负责。二审，只送了一个审稿人，审稿人也没啥意见，建议直接接受。
总的来说，PHYSICA B-CONDENSED MATTER 速度很快，之前投PRB三个月才给一审结果，搞得来来回回耽误了四个月，眼看明年要毕业了，急死个人。建议急着发paper的同学可以试试这个期刊，而且今年中科院分区和IF也上涨了，性价比挺高的

(0) 讚！ | 树树树

Hello, passing friend, how much should the plagiarism rate of this journal be lowered?

(0) 讚！ | 助教

This journal assigned the editor quite early. The reviewer assignment was also quick. One reviewer accepted the invite and completed the assignment in 21 days. The editor was not able to assign new reviewer for 2 full months. Upon contacting the journal on a number of occasions, there was no response from the editor. At last we had to withdraw it after 3 months upon non-response. Bad experience. Not suggested for submission.

(0) 讚！ | NavPhy

Yes, accepted after modification. DFT pure calculation.

(2) 讚！ | dybala

The submission was made in August 2022. It took three months to find reviewers for the first review, and then another three months for the review process. After the first review, there were two reviewers, one suggesting minor revisions and one disagreeing with acceptance. Finally, the editor probably requested some modifications before accepting the paper (thanks to the editor). The second round of revisions took about a month before acceptance in March 2023. Overall, the initial stages were very slow and particularly agonizing.

(0) 讚！ | 夏风如歌

I made two revisions, but my submission was still rejected. I am speechless. None of the three reviewers understood it and made random comments.

(0) 讚！ | zhou,weei

The submission and response process took a total of five weeks. The processing speed of the journal this year is really fast. The impact factor has also increased significantly. I personally think it will stabilize in the third quartile in the future. It's still a good opportunity since it just went up. However, there is still a need for some minor innovations. Overall, it is worth submitting to.

(28) 讚！ | 最强大脑中国好声音