期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱![]() | PHYSICA SCRIPTA LetPub Score 7.6
52 ratings
Rate
Reputation 7.9 Influence 6.8 Speed 8.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | PHYS SCRIPTA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0031-8949 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1402-4896 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 71 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 11.50%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | http://iopscience.iop.org/1402-4896/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | http://atom.iop.org/atom/usermgmt.nsf/EGWebSubmissionWelcome?OpenForm&ISSN=1402-4896 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版商 | IOP Publishing Ltd. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 物理 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | SWEDEN | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 月刊 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 1970 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 4021每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 12.36% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q2
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0031-8949%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 4.8 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: Easy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
|
|
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[PHYSICA SCRIPTA] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: 摩卡香草星冰乐 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-13 22:34:08 評論於 Are the reviewers for the second review the same as the first review? Are there any new reviewers being sought? ![]() ![]() |
作者: Peng2506 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-12 13:11:23 評論於 Just haven't handed it to the editor yet, my classmate also hasn't submitted for over twenty days, so if it's not urgent, just wait a bit. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 我想做科研打工人 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-12 13:03:47 評論於 I have submitted for 10 days and it is still in "Received" status. Has it been ignored directly? ![]() ![]() |
作者: Peng2506 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-12 11:21:51 評論於 25-6-15 submitted 25-6-26 r1 25-8-15 r2 25-8-27 formally accepted 25-9-11 wos retrieval Invincible looks good, editing efficiency is very high, submitted on the second day after submission, sent for review on the third day. One major revision and one minor revision, the major revision looks like it was rejected. The reviewer apologized for not seeing the revised manuscript, causing a delay in time. Wishing the editor and reviewer a safe and happy life, with ten children in one pregnancy. ![]() ![]() |
作者: Suzan 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-07 10:55:22 評論於 I haven't done proofreading for a long time. Do you have any proofreading work for me? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 我只想毕业谢谢! 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-30 12:31:16 評論於 6.16 submission 7.1 major revision 7.30 revision 8.7 minor revision 8.13 revision 8.18 pre-acceptance 8.21 formal acceptance 8.22 article online The major revision was given 28 days, the minor revision was given 5 days, but we both applied for a few days delay. The reviewers were all quite friendly. However, after the minor revision was submitted, I still had to wait for five days. I thought I was rejected and those days made me unable to eat or sleep. Wishing everyone good luck, a major revision is just a minor revision, and a minor revision is acceptance. Keep going! ![]() ![]() |
作者: s0 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-28 22:30:02 評論於 I sent an email asking what was going on, and it turns out that I missed a letter in my email, causing communication issues and preventing me from filling out the copyright transfer agreement. Luckily, I asked about it and I hope to proofread it as soon as possible! ![]() ![]() |
作者: kissinger88 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-26 13:52:35 評論於 Four review comments are all very professional. The revised version was quickly accepted, and the complete source files were submitted, along with the proofread version. ![]() ![]() |
作者: s0 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-25 11:19:02 評論於 After the second trial modification, it has been in provisional acceptance for a month now, and I have no idea what's going on! ![]() ![]() |
作者: 论文小写手 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-21 10:20:35 評論於 The review period is set for two weeks. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 洞然 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-19 00:18:55 評論於 Is it normal to not receive any school assignments for over a month? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 数学分析 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-08 17:21:10 評論於 I have reviewed manuscripts for Physica Scripta multiple times. Based on my experience, the first review usually takes around 12 days, depending on the specific situation of the manuscript. The editorial decision (major revision, minor revision, or acceptance) is made after the author's revisions, and the subsequent review times may vary, but do not exceed the time of the first review. Recently, I reviewed a manuscript that went through 4 rounds of review with three reviewers. After the first review, the editor requested minor revisions. After the revisions, the other two reviewers had no further comments and recommended publication. However, after carefully analyzing the manuscript, I found issues with the theoretical derivation and errors in the formulas, so I requested two more rounds of revisions. Although many may not understand the details, it is important for the paper to withstand scrutiny in the future. I feel that the review speed of this journal is quite fast. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 喜羊羊也爱猫 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-21 12:05:52 評論於 I would like to ask how long it takes for this journal to make a decision on submission for review. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 看看看月亮 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-19 08:30:05 評論於 Within a week. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 郭锦程 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-09 10:53:59 評論於 Is this journal searching for reviewers one by one? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 求心软的审稿人和编辑5555 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-07 16:43:40 評論於 May I ask how long it usually takes for you to submit the proof to the online platform? ![]() ![]() |
作者: VChone 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-04 14:48:06 評論於 Two weeks should be considered relatively fast. ![]() ![]() |
作者: VChone 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-04 14:45:24 評論於 Less than a week. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 郭锦程 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-02 21:29:59 評論於 Could you please tell me how long it took for the reviewers to complete the first round of reviewing your submission? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 郭锦程 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-02 20:35:58 評論於 May I ask if the first reviewer agreed to review the manuscript for over ten days, then it showed that a new reviewer was being sought, and three days later it showed that at least four reviewers had started reviewing the manuscript. Is this because the first reviewer completed the review and found a second reviewer, or did the first reviewer leave? Has anyone encountered this issue? ![]() ![]() |
作者: VChone 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-02 17:21:10 評論於 Received the draft from the publisher, in less than a week. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 求心软的审稿人和编辑5555 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-02 08:39:00 評論於 How long did it take for everyone to use the proof submitted to go online? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 木欢子 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-26 17:46:29 評論於 Hello, how long does it take for the editor to review the manuscript you submitted to PS? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 木子白水 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-25 08:39:00 評論於 I have published several papers in this journal and often review manuscripts for peer review. Overall, I feel that it is relatively easy to get published here, but the process is slow. I would not recommend submitting to this journal if you are in a hurry to graduate. My most recent submission experience was as follows: I submitted on February 25, 2025, and found three reviewers. On April 4, 2025, I received the first round of reviews, all of which were quite positive, but required major revisions from the editor. I submitted the revised manuscript on April 25, 2025. On May 22, 2025, I received the second round of reviews, one reviewer had no further comments, but the other two provided additional feedback. I submitted the final revision on May 27, 2025. On June 24, 2025, I received the final decision, which was a provisional acceptance. It usually takes several more days to receive formal acceptance, and I estimate that the paper will not be officially published until September... Overall, the entire process is just too slow. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 靓仔宝贝疙瘩 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 5.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-24 10:23:34 評論於 Have you submitted your manuscript? How long does it take to receive the submission? ![]() ![]() |
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us