| 期刊簡介 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | PHYSICAL REVIEW B LetPub Score 8.1
51 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.4 Influence 7.5 Speed 9.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 期刊簡稱 | PHYS REV B | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 1098-0121 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| E-ISSN | 2469-9969 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| h-index | 397 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| 自引率 (2023-2024) | 28.10%自引率趨勢 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 掲載範囲 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| 官方網站 | http://prb.aps.org/ | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 在線稿件提交 | https://authors.aps.org/ESUB/ | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 開放訪問 | No | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版商 | American Physical Society | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 主題領域 | 物理 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版國/地區 | UNITED STATES | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 發行頻率 | 週刊 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 創刊年 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 每年文章數 | 5156每年文章數趨勢 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 黃金OA百分比 | 6.98% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q2
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| 索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1098-0121%5BISSN%5D | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 3.0 month(s) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: 50% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 參考鏈接 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| *所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
| [PHYSICAL REVIEW B] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
| 作者: bobcf 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-02 15:47:55 評論於 20251007 submission 20251008 peer review 20251027 revision report 20260112 resubmit revision 20260130 accepted 20260227 publish online 请翻译为: 20251007 submission 20251008 peer review 20251027 revision report 20260112 resubmit revision 20260130 accepted 20260227 publish online |
| 作者: bobcf 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-02 15:39:51 評論於 After submission, the manuscript was sent for review the next day. 20 days later, feedback was received from three reviewers, one positive, one neutral, and one in agreement for publication. After the reply, it was accepted 20 days later and immediately published online after proof submission, which was quite fast. Although there are other journals with higher impact factors, the reputation of PRB in physics is still very good. |
| 作者: MC idol 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-12-11 20:52:05 評論於 Is there any requirement for the email address when registering for this journal? I have tried registering with several different email addresses and it keeps saying the email is invalid. |
| 作者: bisonghu 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-12-01 16:47:37 評論於 Submission will be reviewed and replied within three days, and accepted articles will be returned within a week, the process is very fast. The editor also suggests to make appropriate modifications to the title. |
| 作者: 村中城 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-08 03:54:10 評論於 Directly killed within two days, so decisive... |
| 作者: 村中城 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-04 14:02:50 評論於 Dear viewers, I have another small question: do the editors of PRB work on weekends? Considering the large volume of submissions received by PRB... |
| 作者: 村中城 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-04 13:50:05 評論於 For the first time in my life, I submitted a paper to PRB, directly refuting a classic theory that is still widely accepted in PRB and other journals. Am I asking for trouble? If what I have proposed is considered original, I have heard that it is difficult to avoid rejection when submitting to reputable journals. |
| 作者: 村中城 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-01 11:16:53 評論於 Can I ask you experts what are the requirements of PRB for the graph? What format of file? Of course, it is about schematic diagram, not data graph. |
| 作者: ...111... 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-01 22:07:41 評論於 2025-04-01 WE, half a month, hope to submit for review. |
| 作者: ...111... 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-26 17:22:39 評論於 Submission on March 17, 2025. It's been almost ten days since it was with the editors on March 24, 2020. Is it taking so long? |
| 作者: Curry 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 直接被接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-25 14:04:28 評論於 This comment really amused me. PRB publishes 5000 articles a year, do you think they are all at the level of Wen Xiaogang? There are also many that are not very good. |
| 作者: Saguenay 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-11-15 10:19:31 評論於 The articles in PRB are of really high quality, although the content may not be the most current, the depth is even deeper than PRL. People who can publish in PRB must have exceptional theoretical foundations. It's unbelievable that such a good journal has been classified as a 2nd tier by the Chinese Academy of Sciences... You just know how ridiculous their classification system is... And then there's JMST, always sticking to the top tier... Anyone can see which journal has higher quality. |
| 作者: 906 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 6.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-11 11:28:01 評論於 The review process is really slow, but the editing process is quite fast. It took 3 months to receive the review comments for the first submission because the reviewer couldn't be found. Fortunately, the comments were positive and the paper was accepted after two rounds of revisions. In total, it took almost 6 months from submission to acceptance. |
| 作者: 磕颜 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-04-05 09:56:55 評論於 Key time points in the submission process can be referenced as follows: Received: 13Nov2023 (first submission of initial draft, assigned to reviewers 3 days later) Decision: 22Dec2023 (received comments from two reviewers, minor revisions) Revised: 18Feb2024 (revised and resubmitted) Accepted: 25Mar2024 (editor sought a third reviewer, who agreed and accepted |
| 作者: 宁缺毋滥. 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2024-03-30 09:48:25 評論於 12.18 submitted 1.2 under review 2.16 major revise (One reviewer completely rejected our work, another gave minor revisions, the editor added a third reviewer who also requested minor revisions) 3.29 reject (After revisions, the reviewer who completely rejected the work maintained their original stance, and the editor rejected the manuscript outright) The journal process was fast, but unfortunately we encountered a reviewer who completely rejected our work |
| 作者: 磕颜 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-03-25 16:24:00 評論於 How long will it take to see results after the rework? |
| 作者: 宁缺毋滥. 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-12-18 09:31:31 評論於 Can I take a look at your article? I also work in the field of phonon heat transfer and just submitted an article to PRB |
| 作者: xxyh 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-12-14 10:51:14 評論於 Discharge from hospital |
| 作者: 齐心 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-12-14 10:44:17 評論於 You should have him submit the article to prb instead of prl, so that there will be one prb publication per year |
| 作者: jigglyboy 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2023-10-07 12:07:47 評論於 Submitting papers for ultrafast physics, they were reviewed within two days. The editorial processing speed was even faster than the speed of Draven's bloodthirst, but the review speed was slower than my grandmother's running speed. The two reviewers at Physical Review B have a commendable position in the field of condensed matter, and their reviews are quite professional. In fact, there is no need to be afraid of submitting to this journal as long as your work is well-founded and includes some reasonable physical explanations |
| 作者: Automata 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2023-09-20 10:51:21 評論於 A while ago, I got my first PRB in my life and I hope it's not the last one. There were three reviewers in total. Reviewers 1 and 2 had no major revisions and both thought it was acceptable. However, Reviewer 3 gave me the impression that they had heard of my research field and were somewhat interested, but their literature review was stuck at least 30 years ago. They were almost oblivious to some important work in my field from the 1990s and early this century. They kept getting tangled up in a point that had been recognized as not a problem in this field nearly 20 years ago, and it took several rounds of back and forth before begrudgingly accepting my manuscript. Nonetheless, the fact that the manuscript was approved is good, and I thank the editor for their keen insight |
| 作者: Bolanster 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-03-13 21:17:41 評論於 Dear, I suggest you use your own account here. |
| 作者: suvar 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 5.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-02-21 21:10:37 評論於 When submitting a manuscript, may I ask how to designate the supervisor as the corresponding author using my own account? Or can I only submit the manuscript using the supervisor's account? |
| 作者: 志在远方 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2023-01-28 12:07:37 評論於 PRB does not need a template, just submit directly. |
| 作者: will@gf 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2022-12-23 20:11:06 評論於 A new partition has been created, and many Qiansheng have been promoted to District 1, while PRB remains firmly in District 2. |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
Contact us