The manuscript submitted last June is still under peer review. Are the reviewers and editors still available?

(0) 讚！ | natrue主编

Submitted on July 10th, rejected on September 25th, and not even a single comment? What is the editor doing? This magazine is garbage, not recommended for submission!

(0) 讚！ | jhhcooi

Submitted on 6/18/2023 (assigned editor throughout the process)
Reviews suddenly completed on 8/5/2023 (thought it was rejected at the time)
Received feedback around 8/20/2023 (given one month for major revisions)
Revised on 9/18/2023
Accepted on 11/1/2023 (although a bit slow, but still accepted haha~ Feels good, usually revisions are accepted

(0) 讚！ | chicodudu

2023.09.11 Submission
2023.12.21 Revised
2024.01.04 Reversion submitted
2024.02.10 Accepted for publication

It can only be said that the speed is extremely slow, at least 4-5 months. It is not recommended to submit to this journal if you are in a hurry, it is really slow. During this period, I sent an email to urge a response (waited for two months without any news), and then received some revision suggestions, minor changes. After making the revisions and re-submitting, there was more waiting, but eventually it was accepted for publication

(0) 讚！ | polymer go

10-16 submitted
10-17 editor assigned
10-26 reviewers assigned
10-27 under review
10-30 under review
11-18 reviews completed
11-21 major revision
11-22 R1 submitted
11-22 editor assigned
11-25 reviewers assigned
11-30 under review
2-8 reviewers assigned
2-12 under review
2-16 reviews completed
2-20 accept after revised
2-23 R2 submitted
2-26 editor assigned
3-3 accept

(0) 讚！ | melody

The allocation and review speed of this journal's editors is very slow. It has been a month since submission and it's still at "Editor Assigned."

(0) 讚！ | polymer go

Submitted on 2022.10.26, until today it is still "Reviewers Assigned".

(0) 讚！ | happykeyan

Submitted at the end of December, received on March 25th. Review process completed in two months, with minor revisions provided and 15 suggestions given by two reviewers. One week was given to make the revisions, and the revised version was accepted within one month. Overall, it was quite fast. Wishing the Polymer Journal continuous improvement and success.

(3) 讚！ | 即墨

Trash journal, submitted in April, still waiting for reviewers to be assigned, reminded several times but no response.
Requested withdrawal, but the editor said they are still looking for reviewers and asked for patience. The quality is getting worse year by year.
If you are in a hurry to graduate with your paper, I suggest not submitting to this trash journal. Results won't come out in less than a year or more.

(0) 讚！ | 合泽贵

As someone who has had years of experience as a reviewer for Polymer Bulletin and has also published an article in Polymer Bulletin, I can tell you that your paper will definitely receive suggestions for rejection as well as suggestions for minor revisions from the reviewers. In this case, the editor will find new reviewers, and typically the reviewers are given a three-week period to review the paper. The above opinion is for reference only.

(0) 讚！ | ruby

Too spicy chicken, submitted on 4.25, it has been "Reviewers Assigned" all this time, reminded twice but no response, preparing to withdraw and resubmit, still a Q3 journal, the efficiency is really poor.

(0) 讚！ | 合泽贵

5 months, rejected. It took nearly 50 days to assign an editor, very speechless, waited 5 months for nothing. Not going to submit advice for articles in haste.

(0) 讚！ | 一杯敬过往

Not fast enough, the first attempt was a tragedy... but they said it can be revised and submitted again... After a major revision, the questions were easier to answer... It passed, congratulations to me.

(1) 讚！ | aswang1984

The translation of "12.20 accept" into English is "12:20 accept."

(0) 讚！ | zhd236

It feels quite fast. The preliminary review will give the result within a month, with only one reviewer and 8 comments for major revisions. Actually, there are only two or three main points to address, which are relatively easy to respond to. Following the reviewer's suggestions, a mechanical performance test was added and the revised version was completed within a month. Currently, it is in the hands of the editor. The outcome is unknown.

(0) 讚！ | zhd236

Hello, have you received the results?

(0) 讚！ | cccccc

2020.11.02 Submission
2021.1.22 Major revision
2021.2.22 Resubmission
2021.3.22 Acceptance

(0) 讚！ | DYEPCMs

2020.3.3 Submitted; 2020.4.14 Major revision required; 2020.5.20 Revision submitted; 2020.6.10 Accepted. It was delayed for several weeks due to the epidemic before resubmitting the revision. There are totally 12 questions from two reviewers, and the questions asked are not too difficult to solve. Finally, the transmission and several experiments are supplemented, and it was resubmitted. After with editor for two weeks, it was under review, and the acceptance was notified one day later. It took about 3 months in total.

(0) 讚！ | GNsonicman

2019.9.8 Submitted; 2019.9.13 Reviewers Assigned; 2019.10.3 Under Review; 2019.10.9 Under Review; 2019.10.13 Reviews Completed; 2019.10.23 reviews completed; 2019.10.27 major revision; 2019.11.25 revision completed; 2019.11.26 editor assigned; 2019.11.30 Under Review; 2019.12.25 Reviews completed; 2019.12.28 minor revision; 2019.1.15 revision submitted; 2019.1.18 editor assigned; 2019.1.27 Accept. It is still relatively easy to be accepted, but the timeline is a bit long. It lasted for 5 months from submission to acceptance. You can submit it if you are not in a hurry.

(0) 讚！ | cld123

February 26, 2019: New Submission. March 3, 2019: Under Review. March 16, 2019: Reviewers Assigned. March 17, 2019: Under Review. March 22, 2019: Under Review. April 5, 2019: Reviewers Completed. April 7, 2019: Major Revisions Needed. May 7, 2019: Revision Submitted. May 8, 2019: Editor Assigned. May 12, 2019: Accept. The three reviewers are all doing related research and have professional review comments. We added several characterizations and a set of experiments. A total of two and a half months were spent, which is pretty fast for submission.

(7) 讚！ | o(∩_∩)o 哈哈

was transferred from another journal and thought it would be faster.As a result, the Editor Assigned status has been changed for a month now.A journal with an impact factor of about 1, recommended reviewers are also required to be foreign, speechless, do not select this time next time

(0) 讚！ | 风铃的扎克粉

Submit comments for review after 6 months of submission, overhaul, and directly after modification.

(0) 讚！ | xiaoxiao

The review cycle took a while but overall good experience. I hope this journal only gets better and better!

(2) 讚！ | 聚氨酯

The first return opinion is close to 3 months, and the time in the editor is longer.But the overall is very good, overhauled, the results are unknown.

(1) 讚！ | Y.UP文

My personal manuscript is still relatively fast. I will enter the review draft in about one month. After 15 days, the editor will return the revised comments, upload the revised draft, and accept it for one week, for a total of two months.I hope to give a reference to everyone who will contribute later.

(1) 讚！ | plpc