The review comments came back on August 11th, requiring major revisions and giving one month in total with a total of 2 reviewers. The comments were very constructive. The revised version was submitted for re-evaluation on August 28th.

(0) 讚！ | LIU5566

After revising, I received feedback in 5 days, but the image abstract was still not appropriate. After several attempts, the paper was rejected by the editor in May. Feeling that no core issues were addressed, I resubmitted and it was sent for review this time. In June, two reviewers raised a bunch of questions, which led to numerous revisions and additional experiments. The paper was almost rewritten and returned in mid-July. By the end of July, the reviewers had no further comments, but the editor requested some formatting changes, and it was discovered that the image abstract still did not meet the requirements. After making the necessary changes to the image abstract, it was finally accepted! The journal from Willey had a quick follow-up process.

(0) 讚！ | CBella

On June 11, 2026, the paper was submitted and under review for a long time because you couldn't see if several people had accepted the review and whether they had completed the review. On July 7, 2026, it was in revision (major revision). On July 25, 2026, it was submitted again. On July 26, 2026, it was back under review. On August 9, 2026, it was finally accepted.

(1) 讚！ | fabulous1

Please record this. Submitted in the afternoon of 6.27, changed to UR on 6.28.

(0) 讚！ | LIU5566

Is there any other website where we can see a more detailed and specific review stage besides checking the status of the paper on the submission website? Right now, the system only shows "Under Review" without specifying the exact stage it is in.

(0) 讚！ | 椒盐皮皮虾

5.7 submitted
5.8 returned in the early morning (figure exceeds 12, conclusion not in paragraph form)
5.8 resubmitted after revision
5.12 Under Review
5.19 notified for major revision
6.16 completed major revisions and submitted revised manuscript
6.21 accepted

(0) 讚！ | Kikt

3.30 submission
4.26 rework
6.2 acceptance

(0) 讚！ | 森岛帆高好

Hello, may I ask how long it usually takes to receive the proof after receiving the acceptance email?

(0) 讚！ | Kikt

Hello, may I ask how long it takes to receive the proof after receiving the Accept email?

(0) 讚！ | Kikt

5.8, submission
Revised three times in between, all were graphical abstracts with no text allowed
6.8, major revision
6.15, revised
6.18, minor revision
6.19, revised
6.21, accepted

Currently not recognized as a new area, according to the 2025 CAS implementation, it still counts as CAS Zone 2, which is quite good.

(0) 讚！ | qinhao

4.23 Submitted for review
4.28 Received an email stating that the submission does not meet the requirements and that the image abstract needs to be modified.

(0) 讚！ | CBella

4.23 Submission

(0) 讚！ | ckyf

After acceptance, Wiley will send an email confirmation through the co-author. In order to publish your article, we need you to log in to Wiley Authors and confirm the article's author list. However, the corresponding author cannot find the confirmation section after logging in. The editor sent an email to confirm the authors, but we cannot find where to do this action.

(0) 讚！ | 蚂蚁

4.2 submitted
4.9 under review

Is there any intermediate process? Is there anything like "Manuscript received by Editorial Office" or "With editor"?

(0) 讚！ | ddlianyi

Is this journal's submission under review? How long is the typical review process for this journal?

(0) 讚！ | ddlianyi

Could you please tell me how the graphic abstract can meet the requirements? It has been rejected twice for not meeting the criteria.

(0) 讚！ | lumin985

Yes, only for communication.

(0) 讚！ | 张小

Yes, only sent by communication.

(0) 讚！ | 张小

Hello, I would like to ask if the proof after receiving it is only sent to the communication email.

(0) 讚！ | 大米饭冲呀

After submitting, I revised the graphic abstract 5-6 times, then submitted it for review. After 2 months with no response, I emailed to inquire. A few days later, the editor rejected my submission without providing any feedback. I emailed again to ask for feedback, and only then did the editor provide comments from a reviewer. After reviewing it themselves, the editor still rejected it. It was a waste of time submitting to this journal. I spent almost 3 months with no results.

(0) 讚！ | 学渣博士

All articles published in this journal have corresponding authors listed, so you can contact them based on your research interests and field to find articles in this journal or other journals.

(0) 讚！ | fadingkan

Excuse me, where can I find the information of this reviewer?

(0) 讚！ | 波鸿

4.2 submitted
4.9 under review
8.8 major revision
8.30 submitted
9.18 minor revision
9.26 submitted
9.30 minor revision
9.30 submitted
10.1 accept, production

(0) 讚！ | fadingkan

I am the same. It took 20 days to go from assigning for review to selecting for review. I don't understand what's going on, and this is not the first time I have submitted to this journal.

(0) 讚！ | 东南小明王

25.8.18 Article received
25.8.21 Draft image summary does not meet criteria
25.8.22 Article received
25.8.25 Draft image summary does not meet criteria
25.8.26 Article received
25.8.30 Selecting for Review
25.8.31 Assigning for Review/Under review

(0) 讚！ | 张小