2025.06.05 Submitted to the journal
2025.06.06 With editor
2025.06.13 Reviewer invited
2025.06.14 Under review

(0) 讚！ | QAQ

2024.10.26 Submitted with editor
2024.11.17 Under review
2024.12.08 Major revision (60 days) 
(Extension requested for over a month)
2025.03.11 Resubmitted for revision with editor
2025.03.18 Under review
2025.04.07 Review completed/ decision in process
2025.04.12 Minor revision (14 days)
2025.04.16 Resubmitted for revision with editor
2025.05.06 Under review
2025.05.18 Required reviews completed
2025.05.27 Decision in process
2025.05.28 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | CoolChen

20250318 Submit
20250326 UR
20250415 RRC (2 review comments)
20250505 DIP (4 review comments)
20250512 Reject & Resubmit

Overall the process is going well, but there is a significant difference in the reviewers' opinions, with one rejecting and the other three suggesting minor revisions. The reviewers are very responsible and provide valuable feedback. In the end, the editor mentioned that there were too many areas that needed to be changed and therefore rejected the submission but encouraged resubmission. I will make the necessary revisions and hopefully be accepted smoothly next time!

(0) 讚！ | Trifurs

Submitted in August 2023
Underwent 4 rounds of major revisions
Accepted in May 2025
The reviewers all provided very helpful suggestions!

(0) 讚！ | letpub_cl

The sixth submission was successful, with only two out of the previous five submissions being sent for review. It is a very difficult journal to get published in. The feedback from the reviewers was very professional, and the revisions greatly improved the quality of the article. It is a great honor to have an article published in IEEE GRSM, which is the highest-impact journal in the field of remote sensing.

(0) 讚！ | tree9999

Is the editing teacher still on vacation recently?

(0) 讚！ | 从入门到放弃

10.26 Submission to Editor
11.15 Reviewer invited

(0) 讚！ | CoolChen

October 18th, All Reviews Completed.

(0) 讚！ | kkkkkyyyyy

September 5
September 9 under review
September 15 reviewer invited
September 23 under review

(0) 讚！ | kkkkkyyyyy

After submitting with the editor, if the status shows "decision in progress", does it mean the submission will be rejected?

(0) 讚！ | ecnulc

Can I continue to submit after the rejection of the editor?

(0) 讚！ | paper_king

Is it a explicit requirement of the journal that it cannot exceed 15%? I think the general requirement is usually below 20%.

(0) 讚！ | paper_king

Can I see the status "reviewer invited" in the submission status column?

(0) 讚！ | paper_king

Did you see the status of your reviewer invitation on the submission page?

(0) 讚！ | paper_king

Can you see the status of "invited" for your reviewer(s) on the submission page?

(0) 讚！ | paper_king

I submitted it in early July and it took half a month for the editor to review it, so just be patient.

(0) 讚！ | naivechildghc

May I ask how long it took for the change to occur later on?

(0) 讚！ | 八戒朱

This is really efficient.

(0) 讚！ | 八戒朱

It's been over half a month already, still "with editor", not sure if it will take a long time or just be rejected directly.

(0) 讚！ | 八戒朱

As one of the top journals in the field of remote sensing, RSE's reputation and article quality in recent years are widely recognized. After researching the topic for four to five years, despite being rejected two years ago, the editor-in-chief Marie Weiss provided constructive feedback and direction. After two years of effort, the submission was finally accepted by the editors and reviewers. Best wishes for the continued success of the journal!

There were a total of three reviewers, three rounds of revisions, with major revisions in the first two rounds and acceptance in the final round. Each round of review took 2-3 months, with the same amount of time given for revisions. The editor-in-chief and associate editors responded quickly after each submission, with changes typically made within a week. All three reviewers and the associate editors were professional and emphasized the innovation and rigor of the work. If these criteria were met, they would provide feedback to help improve the quality of the article in other aspects.

(1) 讚！ | 白羊屁孩儿

I apologize for my emotions and my youthful ignorance. I used to think that ideas and creativity were the core of a paper, but RSE has shown me that making it understandable to more people and conducting more detailed investigations and evidence are the true core of an article!

(0) 讚！ | Wcai

Just like me, haha. The reviewer's one sentence "Lack of innovation" really disappointed me.

(0) 讚！ | Wcai018

The chief editor's quick review is commendable. But those three reviewers, can you even read what was written? Are these rubbish articles in RSE approved by you? Not even looking at the methods section, making unwarranted comments? Do you really think you know it all? Do you think you're a big shot? And clearly Chinese, only focusing on your own circle and not those outside of it? What a top journal, more like a toilet, stinking to high heaven.

(0) 讚！ | Wcai018

Hello, may I ask where the resubmitted option is located?

(0) 讚！ | gggg

Jun. 01, 2024: Submitted to the Journal
Jun. 15, 2024: Reviewer Invited
Jun. 18, 2024: Under Review (6 invitations sent, 4 invitations accepted)
Jul. 13, 2024: Under Review (1/4)
Jul. 22, 2024: Under Review (2/4)
Jul. 24, 2024: Under Review (3/4)

(0) 讚！ | Cirrus