It took six months from submission to acceptance. The early stage was slow, with the manuscript taking four months to be reviewed. After receiving major revisions, minor revisions were requested. The manuscript was accepted just two days after the minor revisions were returned. Overall, the early stage was slow, but the review process was quick. The reviewers were responsible and professional. Those with ample time can give it a try, but those nearing graduation are not recommended to do so.

(0) 讚！ | hahaaaaa

Review article, submitted from May 2024 to April 2025, with a review period of nearly one year. After major revisions and minor revisions, finally wrapped up the first work of graduate students. I hope the journal will continue to improve, and I wish everyone smooth submissions!

(0) 讚！ | 大诚子

Excuse me, brother, in this situation, can we directly submit to another journal without rejection or withdrawal? Will it be considered as duplicate submission?

(0) 讚！ | wang

I have been waiting for a year and a half for review, and it feels like the reviewer has disappeared. It's really worrying.

(0) 讚！ | sedrfnlks

Are you summarizing the investment?

(0) 讚！ | 顶刊多多

Hello, may I ask if what you posted is a review article?

(0) 讚！ | 顶刊多多

2024.08 submitted
11.18 with editor
12.16 under review
There have been several changes in time in between, and the manuscript was sent to more reviewers.
03.05 minor revision (Only two reviewers accepted and provided very minor comments, didn't expect the editor to directly give minor revisions)
03.17 revision submitted
03.19 with editor
03.23 decision in process
03.28 accept

(0) 讚！ | wrwxy

What's the situation now, has it been resubmitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | 科研贫困户

It has been two months since the revision was submitted to the journal, and it has not yet reached the editor. Is this normal? It's agonizing.

(0) 讚！ | sagsfhfj

It has been 4 months since submission, one of the two reviewers has provided feedback, but the other reviewer has been silent for over 60 days, it feels like they have disappeared. The editor also hasn't invited new reviewers, it's really frustrating.

(0) 讚！ | 求求大家别卷了

Submission of initial draft on 2024.10.01
10.09 with editor
11.01 under review +1
11.04 under review +2
11.19 Required reviews complete (2)
12.06 decision in process
12.15 Major Review
1.18 submitted
1.19 with editor
1.25 under review
2.10 Required reviews complete (1)
2.23 Minor Review
3.5 submitted
3.6 with editor
3.14 accept
From initial draft to acceptance took less than 6 months. Both reviewers were very nice, with one having no comments and the other providing suggestions for structural optimization, requesting the article to showcase innovation and increase critical analysis. The feedback was very helpful for optimizing the article. It underwent major revisions for the first time. After revisions, minor edits were made to improve grammar and add practical discussions, and it was accepted within a week. The processing speed has improved after changing editors, leading to a longer overall waiting time, but it was worth it.

(0) 讚！ | choerrimy

It's too slow... I applied in December and didn't get rejected until mid-February. Can't they reject me faster? The review process is also too slow.

(0) 讚！ | w

I have been rejected, but fortunately it didn't take too long to be rejected.

(0) 讚！ | 小小小怪

Submission on January 20, 2025,
Under review by the editor on February 2,
Decision in process on February 20.
Doesn't it look like it's going to be rejected?

(0) 讚！ | 小小小怪

Excuse me, OP, should the formatting revisions be kept as well? Or is it sufficient to only keep the textual revisions?

(0) 讚！ | sunnyccshine

2024.1.10 Submitted to the journal
2024.1.17 With editor
2024.7.20 Revision submitted to the journal
2024.7.21 With editor
2024.10.20 Revision submitted to the journal
2024.10.21 With editor
2025.1.7 Revision submitted to the journal
2025.1.8 Accept
The review process for this article took a relatively long time.

(0) 讚！ | damon860808

Submission on October 4, 2024
Accepted on January 28, 2025

(0) 讚！ | jzx

2024.8.15 submitted to journal
9.21 with editor
11.21 under review
12.10 RRC sent 7 returned 6
2025.1.6 Major revision

(0) 讚！ | sunnyccshine

On January 10, 2025, the paper was desk rejected by the editor, stating that it does not fall within the scope of the journal. It's ridiculous. How can we submit to this journal in the future?

(0) 讚！ | 蓝波湾

On January 10, 2025, the submission was desk rejected with editor, stating that it does not fall within the scope of the journal's coverage, which is absurd.

(0) 讚！ | 蓝波湾

The modified version was rejected.

(0) 讚！ | 平心

2024.11.04 DIP
2024.11.17 minor revise (Executive Editor)
2024.11.25 revision submitted to journal
2024.11.27 with editor
2024.12.13 DIP
2024.12.15 Accept

(0) 讚！ | masky

2024.04 submit to journal
2024.05 with editor
2024.06 with editor
2024.06 under review
2024.07.20 minor revise (Reviewers)
2024.07.27 revision submitted to journal
2024.09.10 under review
2024.10.04 review complete
2024.10.04 DIP
2024.10.05 minor revise (Executive Editor)
2024.10.08 revision submitted to journal
2024.10.27 with editor

(0) 讚！ | masky

Dec 02, 2024 submitted to journal
Dec 24, 2024 submitted to journal

(0) 讚！ | 科研贫困户

Editors usually provide the initial review results after 4 months, and pushing for faster feedback is usually ineffective.

(0) 讚！ | sagsfhfj