I heard leaving a comment here can bring good luck.

(0) 讚！ | WannaPub

I hope all reviewers and the editor can give positive feedback to my work.

(0) 讚！ | WannaPub

4.16 Reviewer invited

Please invite the reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | Aatlo

4.16 Suddenly changed UR and skipped the RI stage to become 6-2-0. Within an hour at night, it suddenly changed to 6-3-0, feeling like an addition, really gives me a headache, Zita.

(0) 讚！ | mobiwusi

4.17 two-one-zero.

(0) 讚！ | 星移

Reviewer invited 0-0-3

(0) 讚！ | hmd_ming

4.15 send 15 receive 5 review 0

(0) 讚！ | zwl597

4.13 send 15, pick up 2, review 0

(0) 讚！ | zwl597

3. 31stj
4. 3 Dr. Wu
4. 6 Status change of Seadragon
4. 13 ur

(0) 讚！ | zwl597

I still have not returned the WE 29 now.

(0) 讚！ | mobiwusi

13th IR, WE is exactly two weeks.

(0) 讚！ | 星移

How many of you have been rejected after being reviewed by Zita, that old woman?

(0) 讚！ | CCOLL

I agree, I plan to submit the other two articles to ECM.

(0) 讚！ | mobiwusi

4.12 Still WE

(0) 讚！ | Aatlo

Ugh, it's so disgusting, I'm never submitting to this journal again. It's fine to have high standards, but everyone criticizes Editor Hai Long, yet many people submit to this journal because of his quick response. Editor Z is slow and unpredictable, inexplicably asking for resubmissions. It takes about two weeks for her to handle processes like WE, RRC, and DIP. Basically, submitting to this journal means a minimum of three months with no maximum limit, and the fastest editors are in the energy section. Purely speaking, there are not many good journals that can match the quality of Energy 10+.

(2) 讚！ | 星移

Wow, that was really fast, I'm envious.

(0) 讚！ | 星移

2026.01.16 Submit
2026.01.27 Under Review (Invited 3 reviewers, 2 have responded)
2026.02.02 Under Review (Waiting for one more reviewer)
2026.02.06 RRC (Reviewers' comments received)
2026.02.21 With Editor
2026.02.22 Revision (20 days for revision)
2026.03.14 Resubmit
2026.04.01 Revision (Given 14 days)
2026.04.07 Resubmit
2026.04.09 With Editor
2026.04.11 Accept!

The overall review process was relatively fast, thanks to the quick handling by Editor Sun Wenqiang. Much appreciated!

(0) 讚！ | 微笑312

I submitted it on the 29th, and it is still with the WE now. I think there is a big issue with Zita. None of my senior brothers around me have had a major revision completed in less than a month without rejecting and resubmitting.

(0) 讚！ | mobiwusi

Return for rework on the 1st, it has been 10 days and it is still at WE.

(0) 讚！ | 星移

Too abstract.

(0) 讚！ | 星移

Don't wait, brothers, this lady rejected me straight away. Let's make some modifications and resubmit. Four reviewers didn't reject the paper, with comments from 4, 5, 14, and 5. The majority of the comments were about additional experiments, while the rest focused on textual discussions. Comment 14 seemed a bit like AI and asked some unconventional questions.

(0) 讚！ | CCOLL

This woman is really fierce.

(0) 讚！ | CCOLL

It's Zita. The first submission was rejected after one month, and the second submission took three months for a response. As far as I can remember, there was no DIP for the first review, but the second review's DIP lasted for a week.

(0) 讚！ | DaCEpt

How long does the first trial of DIP take, is the editor Zita?

(0) 讚！ | CCOLL

What's wrong with this thing, I can't comment on it at all.

(0) 讚！ | CCOLL