Brother, if you had said this before being eliminated in the chemosphere, I might not have voted.

(0) 讚！ | Ethan_Deng

I agree too! STOTEN is definitely a classic and good journal.

(0) 讚！ | Vincent H.

I agree with you, at least in the field of atmospheric science, Total is definitely at the TOP level, and can even be considered as a goalkeeper in the first division. It's a pity that they were kicked out, hopefully they can return to SCI soon.

(0) 讚！ | zzz1111

Once there was a paper, a communication published in STOTEN. At that time, STOTEN was still at the peak of its influence, with an impact factor exceeding 10. It was unexpected that it was actually kicked out of SCI. Honestly, there are many mediocre journals in SCI, and STOTEN can definitely be considered as one of the better ones. I agree with STOTEN's decline from Q1 to Q2, but I do not agree with its direct removal from SCI. At least in my field, STOTEN has published a large number of classic articles.

(3) 讚！ | 人间未见书

Awesome, now everyone who used to criticize is silent.

(0) 讚！ | 无敌小旋风

Is it more likely to be kicked out of SCI the longer it is on hold? My TIV has been on hold since last year, does anyone know if it will be kicked out?

(0) 讚！ | gao..99

It seems that the old master in the laboratory always pressures my junior brother to do lateral work, finally he can be free.

(0) 讚！ | 我不合适做科研

Thank you for Professor Philip K. Hopke's speedy rejection, which pulled me back from the edge of the cliff. Otherwise, I would be the one crying today. Coming back a year later to fulfill my vow, I wish you and your family good health and a long life of a hundred years!

(8) 讚！ | Jamin · Xu

The next one is CEJ, just wait and see.

(4) 讚！ | 潜心_

Unfortunately, missed check-in.

(0) 讚！ | zzzzzzxya

I really can't figure out why BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS dropped to the second tier this year.

(1) 讚！ | wwswhh

On November 17, 2025, the wos monthly change was officially removed. A legendary popular journal has come to an end...

(8) 讚！ | 笑忘书老师

It's a pity that there are not many top journals that can be accessed by migrant workers. A few years ago, when they submitted their work, the reviews were still good. It's a shame that they ruined themselves.

(0) 讚！ | 墨瑟

These two are too idealistic and theoretical, their level is too high. Most people work on ecology, but they can only focus on the distribution and characteristics of basic elements. They enjoy what is easy to understand and do not delve too deeply, so these deep insights may not necessarily be referenced by many people.

(0) 讚！ | 林宇艾

The impact factor cannot represent much, and there is too much watering down (many high thresholds, high-quality articles that require in-depth research may not be widely cited, so the impact factor may be low). Even being in the top tier does not mean much. When submitting papers, it is still important to prioritize journals with strict editing and expert reviewers, which can improve the quality of the paper and enhance one's own skills. Those responsible for classifying journals at the Chinese Academy of Sciences should be more accountable, it is understandable to place American journals in the second tier and Chinese journals in the first tier, but watering down journals should not be placed in the first tier!

(0) 讚！ | 林宇艾

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 555

(0) 讚！ | 抵押灵魂*

Ecology, come over here and explain why ecology and Ecological Monographs are in Zone 2. The people who divide the zones are too ridiculous.

(1) 讚！ | MKS

I have already been removed by wo s.

(2) 讚！ | CJFung

An era of spamming has ended, and it is time to list it as a stain and negative factor in one's personal academic experience.

(6) 讚！ | SC

The total ring is kicked, once again reminding everyone that impact factor is not everything, and partitioning is not absolute. Traditional industry journals should be favored. The investigation of environmental issues is not over yet, and we will see the fate of hazardous materials through the ecological index. In addition to environmental issues, the problems of international biomolecules are also very, very, very large! These journals and those like CEJ are only popular because of their large number of articles and relatively low submission difficulty (which is not low now), but in fact, there is a fundamental difference in the operation of journals. Journals from major publishers such as Small, ACS AMI, Materials Horzion should be properly classified.

(10) 讚！ | 高分子小学徒

Check in

(3) 讚！ | 马里奥-小C

I must thank my supervisor, who checked the recent publication volume and strongly disagreed with my decision to submit my paper to a general journal. He suggested submitting it to a journal in the field of agriculture, forestry, or meteorology instead. I successfully graduated later. At that time, I complained about why my supervisor didn't want a journal with an impact factor over 10 and insisted on one with an impact factor of just over 4. Now I understand the importance of that decision.

(4) 讚！ | MKS

The big shot is really well-informed. Just saw the news that they were kicked out.

(17) 讚！ | 九州

Haha, I guess he can't stand others saying something bad about him after he has invested in it.

(3) 讚！ | 请让我发论文

It hasn't been easy to come this far, but it's time to say goodbye.

(1) 讚！ | 大神