Suggestions for the editorial department: The accuracy of the references should be checked, as many references are missing volume numbers or page numbers, making them unable to be retrieved by WOS SCI. Incorrect references cannot be retrieved by WOS SCI.

(0) 讚！ | gung8888

adfm
20250331 rejected, recommended to submit to small;
Small
20250411 submitted;
20250415 with editor

(0) 讚！ | --09

20250219 submit
20250414 under review

20250219 提交
20250414 审查中

(0) 讚！ | accept100

The divisions of the Chinese Academy of Sciences are all stinky, filled with the smell of copper, cliques, and favoritism. Who even bothers to look at them? Being promoted from the fourth division to the first division is a big joke. Domestic journals arrange citation tasks, control the number of publications, and in one or two years, the impact factor can go from 0 to 10, and then the Chinese Academy of Sciences personnel will push it into the first division. Go take a look at the recent structural chemistry at the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Just two years ago, they said they were going to start organizing things, arrange citation tasks, and now, in two or three years, it has soared from 0.8 to 10. Looking at these journals is an insult to one's character. These people are shameless, they've wasted their education, they are just a bunch of garbage.

(0) 讚！ | Thuamr

Our time frame is basically the same. I had the major repair on March 3rd, and returned to work on March 16th. I haven't received a message from you since then.

(0) 讚！ | 欧皇必中

Who is your editor? I am also in electrocatalysis. It has been half a month since I submitted for revisions and there has been no progress.

(0) 讚！ | 欧皇必中

2.10 submit
3.3 major revision
3.21 Resubmit
3.27 minor revision (reviewers accepted, editor has a minor issue)
3.28 revise and accept directly on the same day

(1) 讚！ | minor js

It's so fast, it's been over two months since I submitted it for review and still no news.

(0) 讚！ | 骑猪去旅行1249

It has been over two months since my submission for review and I have not received any response yet.

(0) 讚！ | 骑猪去旅行1249

The review speed is very fast, faster than the two articles from ACS before. The editorial responses are also very quick.

(0) 讚！ | uliswang

27 Feb 2025 submission
18 Mar 2025 major revision
22 Mar 2025 minor revision by editor
25 Mar 2025 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | uliswang

Just submitted to this journal, and need to sign the journal copyright transfer agreement. Does anyone know where to find the copyright transfer agreement for the journal? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | zsq231

Could you please let me know where I can find the copyright transfer agreement document for the journal? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | zsq231

There is no small category one zone anymore, so it is not necessary to invest in domestic small ones that have the same impact factor section.

(0) 讚！ | yitiaoxiaolu

Did not reply, feeling uncomfortable.

(0) 讚！ | Misaka

Our teacher said that Wiley's production data is a manuscript, SI, and TOC without color annotations.

(0) 讚！ | Misaka

Okay, thank you, wish you great success with your article.

(0) 讚！ | 欧皇必中

The production data is a zip file containing high-resolution original TIF format images of all the paper figures.

(0) 讚！ | 艾尔兰咖啡

Did anyone submit Production Data during the first round of revisions? What am I supposed to submit for this? All the raw data?

(0) 讚！ | 欧皇必中

This year will definitely return to the first district.

(0) 讚！ | 让我发个大子刊吧

I hope Small can return to the top division this year!

(0) 讚！ | ZhxStars

Could you please tell me what is the email address for sending reminder emails?

(0) 讚！ | dengdengyiyi

After experiencing six months of ups and downs, undergoing three revisions - two major and one minor, the paper was finally accepted on September 19, 2024. The major revision on October 22, 2024, involved feedback from three reviewers, with a total of 21 comments. The editor made significant revisions and the reviewers were highly professional, ranking the paper in the top 15%. After resubmitting on November 19, 2024, a second major revision was required, with two reviewers agreeing to accept the paper. However, one reviewer criticized the lengthy response and lack of changes. After a subsequent resubmission on January 1, 2025, the paper was still in limbo until February 7, 2025, when the authors had to send a reminder to the editor. The editor revealed that one reviewer had disappeared (malicious review) and a fourth reviewer was invited. With a minor revision on March 3, 2025, the fourth reviewer approved the response to the second reviewer. Finally, on March 10, 2025, the paper was accepted. Best wishes to everyone for a speedy acceptance! We hope that Small will return to the top tier!

(0) 讚！ | ZhxStars

AEM has not been submitted for review. I suggest transferring to Small and submitting directly. When will Small be able to return to the first district?

(0) 讚！ | Misaka

May I ask how many comments we received after such a long review process?

(0) 讚！ | gegemeimei