In the field of environmental water treatment, the submission to Angew was rejected. The boss suggested receiving feedback and transferring it to Small. The original reviewer accepted the revised version after minor revisions. The boss's intention is to not worry about the rankings of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, as reputation within the industry is more important.

(0) 讚！ | 真心大猫熊

March 16th AFM transferred to Small
April 11th Major revision: four reviewers
April 30th Revised
June 2nd Minor revision, revised on the same day
June 5th Editor minor revision, revised on the same day
June 6th Accepted
Looking forward to Small returning to Zone 1!

(0) 讚！ | 小董亡命天涯

5.31 Submission
6.8 Manuscript submitted

(0) 讚！ | 棒棒棒123

5.26 Submission
6.2 Editing
6.4 Review
Hope the reviewers will be lenient.

(0) 讚！ | 中中中！！！

My situation is the same. After being submitted for review on February 27th, the date has not changed in three months. I suspect we have the same editor. It's really frustrating to be delayed like this for the first time submitting to this journal.

(0) 讚！ | Keven678

I have urged the draft three times, but still don't know who the editor is. And in four days, it will be 100 days since the first review. Small is really amazing.

(0) 讚！ | accept100

This is a familiar operating style in the country.

(0) 讚！ | 有点老了

Does AFM directly provide the opportunity to transfer to small?

(0) 讚！ | 有点老了

Fuel cell direction AEM switched to Small.
2.25 With Editor in the afternoon,
2.26 Under Review
3.19 Major Revision, 12 comments from two reviewers.
4.04 One reviewer disappeared after the revision, a third reviewer was assigned.
5.08 Major Revision, the third reviewer raised 6 minor issues, easily addressed. Revised on 5.12
5.12 Minor Revision, Editor suggested shortening the title, revised in the afternoon.
5.12 Accept
Overall, Small's editorial efficiency is very high, processing the manuscript in less than a day. If it weren't for one reviewer disappearing, the process would have likely been completed in just over two months.
Thank you, Small, for allowing me to receive this acceptance at a critical moment in my graduation. A good journal is one that helps students graduate on time~ I hope Small continues to improve.

(0) 讚！ | DesertsKK

Submission AFM20240903
Rejected and resubmitted to small20240905
Resubmitted for revisions 20241009
Second round of revisions 20241022
Finally published 20241118
There were still some minor issues in the second round, which the editor pointed out, but it was already pre-accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 1012。

This is because when citing, the article does not yet have a "volume number" and "page number", so the DOI is included.

(0) 讚！ | Misaka

Suggestions for the editorial department: The accuracy of the references should be checked, as many references are missing volume numbers or page numbers, making them unable to be retrieved by WOS SCI. Incorrect references cannot be retrieved by WOS SCI.

(0) 讚！ | gung8888

adfm
20250331 rejected, recommended to submit to small;
Small
20250411 submitted;
20250415 with editor

(0) 讚！ | --09

20250219 submit
20250414 under review

20250219 提交
20250414 审查中

(0) 讚！ | accept100

The divisions of the Chinese Academy of Sciences are all stinky, filled with the smell of copper, cliques, and favoritism. Who even bothers to look at them? Being promoted from the fourth division to the first division is a big joke. Domestic journals arrange citation tasks, control the number of publications, and in one or two years, the impact factor can go from 0 to 10, and then the Chinese Academy of Sciences personnel will push it into the first division. Go take a look at the recent structural chemistry at the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Just two years ago, they said they were going to start organizing things, arrange citation tasks, and now, in two or three years, it has soared from 0.8 to 10. Looking at these journals is an insult to one's character. These people are shameless, they've wasted their education, they are just a bunch of garbage.

(0) 讚！ | Thuamr

Our time frame is basically the same. I had the major repair on March 3rd, and returned to work on March 16th. I haven't received a message from you since then.

(0) 讚！ | 欧皇必中

Who is your editor? I am also in electrocatalysis. It has been half a month since I submitted for revisions and there has been no progress.

(0) 讚！ | 欧皇必中

2.10 submit
3.3 major revision
3.21 Resubmit
3.27 minor revision (reviewers accepted, editor has a minor issue)
3.28 revise and accept directly on the same day

(1) 讚！ | minor js

It's so fast, it's been over two months since I submitted it for review and still no news.

(0) 讚！ | 骑猪去旅行1249

It has been over two months since my submission for review and I have not received any response yet.

(0) 讚！ | 骑猪去旅行1249

The review speed is very fast, faster than the two articles from ACS before. The editorial responses are also very quick.

(0) 讚！ | uliswang

27 Feb 2025 submission
18 Mar 2025 major revision
22 Mar 2025 minor revision by editor
25 Mar 2025 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | uliswang

Just submitted to this journal, and need to sign the journal copyright transfer agreement. Does anyone know where to find the copyright transfer agreement for the journal? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | zsq231

Could you please let me know where I can find the copyright transfer agreement document for the journal? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | zsq231

There is no small category one zone anymore, so it is not necessary to invest in domestic small ones that have the same impact factor section.

(1) 讚！ | yitiaoxiaolu