When did everyone submit their contributions? How long does it take for under review to receive feedback?

(0) 讚！ | 小小肖

Dropped three districts, after the major repairs were completed, I don't know if I should invest again! Can't believe it dropped.

(0) 讚！ | Soul-mate

I am also undergoing major repairs and have already withdrawn.

(0) 讚！ | Ray__

Dropped, repaired, not sure if I should invest more.

(0) 讚！ | ynuyyc

Did you disconnect?

(0) 讚！ | Ray__

How is the situation going? I submitted an article this month, but it is still in the "waiting for editorial assessment" status and has not been sent for review yet.

(0) 讚！ | dadayang88

Not really.

(0) 讚！ | 1·

Do contributors to this journal have to be members of the Japanese Geotechnical Society or the International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering?

(0) 讚！ | 欧阳锋的眼泪

2025.1.7 Submitted
2025.1.15 Under review
2025.4.12 Received reviewer comments, over 30 changes required, over 20 explanations needed
2025.6.15 Submit revised manuscript
2025.8.13 Accepted
The journal's requirements are high, with strict reviews, it is a well-established journal.

(1) 讚！ | 肖尧1992

It's really not worth the effort to submit to small Japanese journals, I suggest avoiding them.

(0) 讚！ | ray

8.7 Required Reviews Complete

(0) 讚！ | am0525

Does changing the editor twice mean it will be rejected?

(0) 讚！ | csuwb

Submitted on February 8th, revised comments on May 30th, submitted revised comments on July 8th. We are currently in the "waiting for editor" status. Will the reviewers be asked to review again or will the decision be made directly by the editor?

(0) 讚！ | Lagendary

If we become a dip for a period of time, it is usually because the editor is writing rejection comments. I have experienced the same thing before, and the editor will give you some suggestions.

(0) 讚！ | poooccci

Does it mean rejection if it turns into a dip directly?

(0) 讚！ | ray

4.23 submitted
5.6 asked to modify the format and resubmit
5.7 still with the editor until now, it's already 7.7
I really don't understand what this journal is up to...

(0) 讚！ | ray

6.14 Date of submission
6.22 under review

(0) 讚！ | am0525

It's just slow, took nearly seven months to get the first review, and it stayed in the hands of the editor for over two months. The review process was fine, but after the first review was completed, there was no second acceptance for a long time. The second acceptance and review were received on the same day. The feedback received included comments from the reviewer and the editor. In short, it's just slow.

(0) 讚！ | 科研初级民工

The quality of the journal is very high and it is highly recognized in Japan and Southeast Asia. However, the review process is really slow, with each round of submission and revision to the editor taking over half a month.

(0) 讚！ | Geo1904

Provided a lot of professional opinions.

(0) 讚！ | 于关生

You dare to submit to Japanese journals, having submitted once before. After repeatedly modifying the format, down to the reference citation style, it took about a month to finalize the revisions. In the end, it was rejected without review.

(0) 讚！ | Dr.Shu0411

After more than two months, "we" turned into "dip", sigh ?.

(0) 讚！ | checkless

This is an old journal.

(0) 讚！ | JIANGXF

Is the status of "with editor" before the journal is returned for revisions and resubmission? Does the status change to "under review" only after the revisions are requested?

(0) 讚！ | checkless

5.2 Decision in process. No review, should be a direct rejection. Too difficult

(0) 讚！ | 年轮