Just translate the following passage into English.

(0) 讚！ | axlville

Hello, I would like to ask if the resubmitted version for repair should be in PDF or Word format?

(0) 讚！ | peter2333

Hello, I would like to ask if the revised manuscript should be submitted in PDF or Word format.

(0) 讚！ | peter2333

4.25 Submitted
4.28 Sent to two reviewers
5.23 Minor revisions requested
6.23 Revised within a month
7.05 Revised submission
7.10 Sent for second review
7.22 More revisions requested
8.8 Revised submission deadline changed once
8.18 Accepted

Overall, the reviewers were very nice, provided good feedback, and were efficient. However, the editorial process was very slow, possibly due to a backlog of submissions.

(0) 讚！ | yicccc

There are only 2 reviewers, so it will take us about two weeks to submit the review.

(0) 讚！ | axlville

How many reviewers were sent for rework, and how long will it be under review?

(0) 讚！ | peter2333

Two days delivery, super fast.

(0) 讚！ | accept SCI

2025-04-29 submitted
2025-05-18 under review
2025-06-12 review complete
2025-06-27 Article revised
2025-07-12 Article accepted for publication
In less than 3 months, the editorial process was very fast, and the reviewers were also quite friendly. It's a pity that when it was submitted, it was still a top journal, but this year it has become non-top. Hopefully, the journal will continue to improve and return to being a top journal soon.

(0) 讚！ | axlville

When submitting the manuscript, should it be in PDF format or in TEX format?

(0) 讚！ | youerdam

Just want to ask if anyone has received a "Revise" status after the external review, with two reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | peter2333

This situation is probably due to not finding the reviewer. I have encountered similar situations when submitting to ECM before. It can only be said that submitting papers still depends on luck.

(0) 讚！ | axlville

I want to know how long it takes for the results to come out after your external audit, and if you were rejected during the DIP period. It's been almost 3 weeks since my first audit, and I still haven't received any results. I'm worried.

(0) 讚！ | yichen yuan

Trash journal, doesn't even reply to emails.

(0) 讚！ | 稻花香

Submitted in May, under review within two weeks.
After review, the article was not rejected by the editor without any review comments, but the feedback given was that it did not meet the scope of the journal.
A waste of time.
Have submitted to many other journals before, but this is the first time encountering such a disgusting experience.
A trashy journal, be cautious when submitting.

(1) 讚！ | 稻花香

Received at Editorial Office: 7 Mar 2025 
Article revised: 13 May 2025 
Article accepted for publication: 1 Jun 2025

A very pleasant submission, from submission to acceptance in less than three months, thanks to the editor-in-chief and three reviewers!

(0) 讚！ | wang

How are you doing right now?

(0) 讚！ | axlville

Hello, is it rejected by the editor, or is it under review?

(0) 讚！ | 小猪椰蓉

It is indeed very slow, mine has been a week as well, and it has always been "we".

(0) 讚！ | peter2333

4.8 until now with editor

(0) 讚！ | Katya

3 out of 5 were rejected by the table, what a waste of time!

(0) 讚！ | Echizen

2.17 submitted for review with editor
3.4 with editor (changed the date)
Seems a bit slow, doesn't it?

(0) 讚！ | Abc789

3.26 The second reviewer UR

(0) 讚！ | Z

Please revise the 21-day modification period on March 8th.

(0) 讚！ | Z

Receive good luck, receive, receive, accept, please, please, please.

(0) 讚！ | Z

Submission on January 24, the first review ended on January 30, and the second review ended on March 3.

(1) 讚！ | Z