This situation is probably due to not finding the reviewer. I have encountered similar situations when submitting to ECM before. It can only be said that submitting papers still depends on luck.

(0) 讚！ | axlville

I want to know how long it takes for the results to come out after your external audit, and if you were rejected during the DIP period. It's been almost 3 weeks since my first audit, and I still haven't received any results. I'm worried.

(0) 讚！ | yichen yuan

Trash journal, doesn't even reply to emails.

(0) 讚！ | 稻花香

Submitted in May, under review within two weeks.
After review, the article was not rejected by the editor without any review comments, but the feedback given was that it did not meet the scope of the journal.
A waste of time.
Have submitted to many other journals before, but this is the first time encountering such a disgusting experience.
A trashy journal, be cautious when submitting.

(1) 讚！ | 稻花香

Received at Editorial Office: 7 Mar 2025 
Article revised: 13 May 2025 
Article accepted for publication: 1 Jun 2025

A very pleasant submission, from submission to acceptance in less than three months, thanks to the editor-in-chief and three reviewers!

(0) 讚！ | wang

How are you doing right now?

(0) 讚！ | axlville

Hello, is it rejected by the editor, or is it under review?

(0) 讚！ | 小猪椰蓉

It is indeed very slow, mine has been a week as well, and it has always been "we".

(0) 讚！ | peter2333

4.8 until now with editor

(0) 讚！ | Katya

3 out of 5 were rejected by the table, what a waste of time!

(0) 讚！ | Echizen

2.17 submitted for review with editor
3.4 with editor (changed the date)
Seems a bit slow, doesn't it?

(0) 讚！ | Abc789

3.26 The second reviewer UR

(0) 讚！ | Z

Please revise the 21-day modification period on March 8th.

(0) 讚！ | Z

Receive good luck, receive, receive, accept, please, please, please.

(0) 讚！ | Z

Submission on January 24, the first review ended on January 30, and the second review ended on March 3.

(1) 讚！ | Z

Received at Editorial Office: 10 Aug 2024
Article revised: 28 Nov 2024
Article accepted for publication: 23 Dec 2024
The overall speed was fast, and reviewers were quickly found after the initial submission.

(0) 讚！ | ffffffffa

The editors value innovation and experimental data very highly. They have strict requirements for English proficiency, and they expect in-depth analysis of both theory and experiments in long articles. The manuscript review process is very professional, with reviewers posing very professional questions to ensure the rigor of the paper. They hope that everyone can be accepted for publication. Let's progress together and discuss improvements.

7.10 submitted to the journal 7.11 with editor
7.21 under review 5-6-1
7.23 under review 7-2-9
7.26 under review 0-7-6
Group
8.4 under review 5-6-1
8.8 under review 7-2-9
8.9 required reviews complete 0-7-6
9.10 resubmit group
9.13 under review 5-6-1
9.15 under review 7-2-9
9.16 under review 0-7-6
9.29 accept

(0) 讚！ | kekeshijie

2024-06-16 submit
2024-06-28 under review
2024-07-14 rrc
Submitted to four reviewers, received feedback from three, one reviewer had no comments, suggesting a possibility of acceptance.
The feedback from the three reviewers was positive, with some constructive suggestions for improvement, and a 21-day revision period was given.
During a family member's illness, I worked overtime in the hospital to complete the revisions and submitted on the 20th day.
2024-08-17 Under review
2024-08-20 rrc
The review process was very fast, both reviewers accepted the paper, with one reviewer pointing out some formatting issues.
Quickly made the necessary revisions and resubmitted.
2024-08-29 under review
2024-09-13 accepted
The editorial process was very prompt, the feedback from the reviewers was professional and constructive, leading to improvements in the paper.
Overall, it was a good journal.

(0) 讚！ | axlville

The fourth reviewer accepted the review and ran away, so the editor waited for more than 40 days before inviting a new reviewer, also out of respect for the reviewers. Most of the time, the editor's handling is very fast, with the main delay being the reviewers. After observation, the time given to reviewers and authors should be 21 days, and the number of reviewers needed to make a decision should be 3.

Overall, the efficiency of the journal and editor is still very high, but the reviewers' speed is indeed uncontrollable. If you are lucky, the review will be completed in a day or two, but if you are unlucky, it will be like mine. I hope this information can help other teachers and students who are submitting articles, and wish everyone encounters fast reviewers and smoothly publishes their articles!

(0) 讚！ | Mikcyhyl

2024.8.15 resubmit
2024.8.20 under review (Round 3, invited 1 reviewer, 1 accepted review, 0 completed)
2024.9.7 review complete (Round 3, invited 1 reviewer, 1 accepted review, 1 completed)
2024.9.7 accept

(0) 讚！ | Mikcyhyl

2024.5.27 resubmit
2024.5.29 under review (Round 2, invited 3 reviewers, 2 accepted, 0 completed)
2024.5.30 under review (Round 2, invited 3 reviewers, 2 accepted, 1 completed)
2024.6.4 under review (Round 2, invited 3 reviewers, 2 accepted, 2 completed)
2024.6.8 under review (Round 2, invited 4 reviewers, 3 accepted, 2 completed)
2024.7.24 under review (Round 2, invited 5 reviewers, 4 accepted, 2 completed)
2024.8.14 review complete (Round 2, invited 5 reviewers, 4 accepted, 3 completed)
2024.8.14 request for revision (Minor revisions, 3 required, 21 days for revisions)

(0) 讚！ | Mikcyhyl

Specific process:
2024.3.22 submit
2024.4.3 under review
2024.4.11 under review (first round, 4 reviewers invited, 3 accepted, 0 completed)
2024.4.28 review complete (first round, 4 reviewers invited, 3 accepted, 1 completed)
2024.5.2 review complete (first round, 4 reviewers invited, 3 accepted, 2 completed)
2024.5.5 review complete (first round, 4 reviewers invited, 3 accepted, 3 completed)
2024.5.6 request for revision (1 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative, but not many specific comments, given 21 days for revision)

(0) 讚！ | Mikcyhyl

2024.3.4 submit
2024.3.14 reject (Repeated rate not passed, requires less than 10%. It is recommended that everyone self-check with iThenticate before submitting)
2024.3.22 submit
2024.4.3 under review
2024.5.6 request for revision
2024.5.27 resubmit
2024.5.29 under review
2024.8.14 request for revision
2024.8.15 resubmit
2024.8.20 under review
2024.9.7 accept

(0) 讚！ | Mikcyhyl

No, one and a half months for the first review is still normal, two and a half months for the second review... it's been half a month for the third review... Although it's slow, I see that the main reason in the Track link is the slow reviewers, the processing speed of the editors is still very fast. I don't see others being that slow either...

(0) 讚！ | Mikcyhyl

It has been 1 month and 5 days since with editor, what is this journal doing? Does everyone go through this process? Do we need to push for submission?

(0) 讚！ | CC-Coach