I submitted on August 3rd and as of September 1st, it is still with the editor.

(0) 讚！ | silver

Agata Michalska is not an effective associate editor. She keeps manuscripts under review for long periods (sometimes up to 8 weeks) before making a decision. In some cases, she selects reviewers from her own institution in Poland, which raises concerns about fairness and potential conflicts of interest. These practices appear unprofessional, and it may be appropriate to raise this issue with Elsevier.

(0) 讚！ | lkj@e.com

Agata Michalska is not an effective associate editor. She keeps manuscripts under review for long periods (sometimes up to 8 weeks) before making a decision. In some cases, she selects reviewers from her own institution in Poland, which raises concerns about fairness and potential conflicts of interest. These practices appear unprofessional, and it may be appropriate to raise this issue with Elsevier.

(0) 讚！ | lkj@e.com

So fast, I invested on 7.10, you invested on 7.12, but there is still no movement now.

(0) 讚！ | 樟树坡

Can it be so fast in just 15 days!!!

(0) 讚！ | Marchhhhh

The reviewers do not know who the editor is until they read the editor's reply letter. The recommended reviewers were not accepted, and it is strange that the status on the public account is not unified (even though the review has been completed, it still shows as "review complete" on the public account).

(0) 讚！ | Brad Wang

To know who the editor of the review is, you have to check the reply letter from the editor. This journal is a bit strange, as the status on the official account is not consistent, and it is unclear whether it is a double-blind review.

(0) 讚！ | Brad Wang

Can I ask if this journal accepts review articles? Can I submit directly without being invited?

(0) 讚！ | 秋天的西瓜

Hello, could you please share the checklist with me? This journal has not been submitted before and there is no checklist template available.

(0) 讚！ | 逐梦无惧

How can I know who my editor is?

(0) 讚！ | 好

Excuse me, do you know who the reviewers are for this journal? Have the reviewers you recommended been accepted? Is the review process single-blind or double-blind?

(0) 讚！ | 好

2025/4/15 submit to journal
2025/4/17 with editor
2025/4/22 under review (8 reviewers were invited, 3 agree to review)
2025/5/3 required reviews complete
2025/5/5 review complete (major revision, deadline on 8/3)
2025/6/15 resubmit
2025/6/16 under review
2025/6/4 required reviews complete
2025/6/29 accept

The journal's processing speed is very fast; most of the time is wasted by reviewers and oneself. The editor handling the review is Ping Yu.

(0) 讚！ | Brad Wang

5.20 submitted, 5.25 under review, and this status remained until 6.15.

(0) 讚！ | 好

5.29 STJ
6.1 WE
6.7 UR

(0) 讚！ | 半死桐

6.13 WE

(0) 讚！ | zzyymm

记录一下 6.13 STJ

Record 6.13 STJ

(0) 讚！ | zzyymm

My editor is Professor António Osmaro Rangel, PhD, who is super nice. Thank you, editor! Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | tongqiao

To reply to the comment below, I'm sorry for the incorrect response.

(0) 讚！ | tongqiao

My editor is Professor António Osmaro Rangel, PhD, he is super nice, thank you editor!

(0) 讚！ | tongqiao

How long will it take to review? I have also submitted for over a week and it is still in stj.

(0) 讚！ | chocolate666

Invested on May 13th, and it UR on May 19th.

(0) 讚！ | Elijah Fisher

4.24 is still STJ, is it still STJ on May 1st, why is the speed of Talanta so slow now...

(0) 讚！ | Yanbing96

Did you send it for external review? Who is the editor?

(0) 讚！ | 小松接好运

Hello, may I ask who your editor is?

(0) 讚！ | 小松接好运

Hello, may I ask who your editor is?

(0) 讚！ | 小松接好运