Encountered a divine editor, the speed of each stage is particularly fast! The quality of the journal is also very high, hoping the impact factor will rise quickly!
Three reviewers were invited in total.
Submission received 27 Dec 2024
Editor assigned 29 Dec 2024
First reviewer(s) invited 06 Jan 2025
Reviewer(s) accepted 06 Jan 2025
Reviewer report(s) received 13 Jan 2025
Revision requested 10 Feb 2025
Revision received 08 Mar 2025
First reviewer(s) invited 09 Mar 2025
Reviewer report(s) received 13 Mar 2025
Submission accepted 25 Apr 2025

(1) 讚！ | 一口大橘

Submitted on July 25, 2024, received first feedback on September 22, 2024, first revised submission on October 20, 2024, received second feedback on November 7, 2024, submitted on November 26, 2024, directly accepted on November 27, 2024, published on January 9, taking 5 months in total. The journal editors are very efficient and responsive, hoping for a quick increase in the impact factor!

(0) 讚！ | haodachu

Submission received 22 Jul 2024
Editor assigned 22 Jul 2024
First reviewer(s) invited 29 Jul 2024
Reviewer(s) accepted 30 Jul 2024
Reviewer report(s) received 19 Aug 2024
Revision requested 26 Aug 2024
Revision received 03 Sep 2024
First reviewer(s) invited 09 Sep 2024
Reviewer(s) accepted 10 Sep 2024
Reviewer report(s) received 13 Sep 2024
Submission accepted 25 Oct 2024
Publishing and rights complete 13 Dec 2024

(0) 讚！ | 一路向北1168

The review process was relatively slow, possibly due to difficulty in finding reviewers. The second reviewer delayed the process for over two months. The manuscript was submitted on May 2, 2024, first revised on October 17, second revised on November 3, and finally accepted on November 28. During the second revision, changes were also made to the corresponding author.

(0) 讚！ | lxk123

I feel that the third district is the most reasonable, the Chinese Academy of Sciences' reduction zone is like playing.

(0) 讚！ | 阿hao1

25 Mar 2024 submitted (IF=3.4[2022]) (2.8 [2023])
06 Apr Reviewers invited
28 Apr Reviews received
20 Jun Reviews received
22 Jun Revision requested R1 (Major)
19 Aug Reviews received
20 Aug Revision requested (R2) Minor
05 Sep (R2) Submitted
09 Sep Reviewers invited (for R3)
18 Sep Reviews received
26 Sep Reviewers agreed
04 Oct Reviews received
13 Oct Revision requested (R3)[Minor)
14 Oct (R3) submitted

15 Oct 2024 ACCEPTED Alhamdulillah

(0) 讚！ | Ali YEMEN

There's no way this journal should be classified into Zone 4, right?

(0) 讚！ | aaa

The journal has a long history and I will consider submitting again after three months

(0) 讚！ | 阿hao1

Have you sent it for external review?

(0) 讚！ | 阿hao1

Submitted in May 2017, never peer reviewed, rejected in September 2018, editor sent an email suggesting resubmission, which is ridiculous. Resubmit what, if being fooled by you once is your fault, being fooled by you twice is my fault

(0) 讚！ | 老帅哥

Hello, may I know how many reviewers you are?

(0) 讚！ | 阿hao1

How many reviewers are there?

(0) 讚！ | 阿hao1

Submission history
23 Nov 2023
Submission is in publishing and rights
23 Nov 2023
Peer review
Submission status	Date
Submission accepted
20 Nov 2023
Submission under peer review
14 Nov 2023
Submission passed technical check
14 Nov 2023 Amendment received
14 Nov 2023 Revision received
18 Jul 2023 Submission received

(1) 讚！ | 仙林以东

"Receive for 3 and a half months."

(0) 讚！ | chenchao718

I have submitted 2 articles to this journal, one has been published in 2019, and the other one is still under revision.

(2) 讚！ | 王北风

This is the second article submitted in the journal, which is extremely slow. After with editor for almost two months ago, it has not been sent for review. We had written to the chief editor twice, but there was no response. Students who are anxious to graduate must not submit to this journal; it is too slow.

(3) 讚！ | 王北风

2018/10/29 Submission; 2018/12/9 Major revision; 2019/1/21 Returned to the journal; 2019/7/31 Minor revision; 2019/8/ 21 Returned to the journal; 2019/9/16 Accepted. I am sorry for that I didn’t take notes on more detailed statuses (“the editor”, “under review”, etc.). I did not find a record of this process in the interface of submission system.

(1) 讚！ | Accept

Submitted in January 2018, the first trial speed is a bit slow, probably usedAfter 7 months, I was urged once and returned to the reviewer's opinion, which required major repairs.It took me three months to make changes, and the reviewer said that I needed to polish the language and found LetPub, which probably took another month.Because the modification time that was given at the beginning was 3 months, I also applied for an extension of one month.After returning to the revised draft in early December 2018, it will be notified directly for about one week. The overall situation is still smooth, and thanks to the excellent service provided by LetPub.

(4) 讚！ | jerryrat

This is my first English-language paper. After a major overhaul and two minor repairs, the overall submission is still smooth.With editor for three months, the time is longer, and then for three consecutive days to send a letter to the editor in charge of the trial, the fourth day for review.Under review After more than 20 days, the overhaul comments returned. After two minor repairs, they were accepted smoothly. The reviewers are experts in the field and the opinions are very professional.The editor-in-chief is very timely.Very good submission experience.

(11) 讚！ | 王北风

2017 September 14th contributionAfter undergoing a major overhaul, a minor repair, and then received, the editor is very good, the efficiency is also very high, that is, the under review time is a bit long, from submission to get the review comments for more than three months, the middle of the mail reminderOnce, then return to a reviewer's opinion, after the overhaul, the editor gave a small repair opinion.

(1) 讚！ | cindy yue

submitted to the recruitment for a total of one year and four months, the main reason is that one applied for two extensions.There are too many things, and the second is that the review has been reviewed for six months, and it is speechless.The editor is quite good, every time I agree, and I am very enthusiastic about pointing out a lot of grammar mistakes.

(0) 讚！ | HWCL

Before watching the online review, the review period was very slow, and the trepidation was sent. The first trial was very fast. The result of one month was a minor repair and overhaul. The overhaul was more troublesome.month.The results of the second trial for more than 20 days, the serious reply of the first trial may have touched the reviewers, and the two reviewers agreed that minor revisions were accepted.The review is very fast, gained experience, can be repaired slowly but must be of high quality ~ rookie experience everyone 勉

(1) 讚！ | climate

I have been with the editor for the past 3 months. I wrote a letter in the middle without reply, and wrote a retreat after 3 months.Manuscript letter, no reply.After 1 week, I wrote a letter and reiterated that I didn't want to retract the manuscript. I want to see the next step!The three emails finally responded, sent for review, and soon there was a result, overhaul.In the middle of the New Year, the 30th is still being revised, but the feeling is worth it, the result is very good, and finally received it~The impact factor is not bad, but it is not super-average, the average impact factor of meteorology is 2.7~~~

(1) 讚！ | airmass

This is my first English paper. After a major overhaul and a minor repair, the overall submission is still smooth. If it is not for personal reasons, it should be faster.Now that TAAC's impact factor has reached 2.4, it should continue to rise.The reviewers are more rigorous and have put forward many targeted opinions and suggestions.The specific submission process is as follows:2016.1.28 Submission;2016.1.29 With Editor;2016.4.4 Under Review;2016.5.6 Revise;2016.6.27 Revion Submitted to Journal;2016.6.28 With Editor;2016.7.3 Under Review;2016.7.14 Revise;2016.8.29 April Submitted to Journal;2016.8.31 With Editor;2016.9.2 Accepted.

(3) 讚！ | xuyu906@163.com

The article was submitted in mid-June 2015, and ‘under review’ was displayed in mid-July. Then there was no news for nearly 6 months. At the end of January, the editorial comments were returned. The editor was very pleasant and explained the delay. The reason was that several reviewers they were looking for all said that they could not do the review. The final opinion asked for a minor revision. I changed it the next day, sent it back, and then waited 1 month. It was accepted in early March. This is my first paper and first SCI. I was happy. But the review time lasted for half a year.

(4) 讚！ | nihaohucheng@163.com