Do we need three reviewers now? Why were the manuscript sent for review again after receiving feedback from two reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | 有风015

I am the same way. May I ask what the reason is? Is it because of too many differences in opinions?

(0) 讚！ | 有风015

Can you tell me what are the chances of rejection for this journal submission?

(0) 讚！ | Beautiful 单词

Wasn't it hired in just one month?

(0) 讚！ | 含章96

Oh, hired in one month?

(0) 讚！ | 含章96

Is it difficult to find reviewers recently?

(0) 讚！ | yaozhongsss

Translation: Just like you, may I ask why the editorial opinions are different?

(0) 讚！ | Times New Roman

Is this journal relatively good for submission?

(0) 讚！ | CaiW_UoN

How many reviewers are there for this journal now? I have received feedback from two reviewers and have sent it to a third reviewer. Previously, the final decision was made with feedback from just two reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | 左岸~

Do all authors need to confirm in this journal?

(0) 讚！ | ACCEPTs

Does this journal require all authors to confirm?

(0) 讚！ | ACCEPTs

Submitted at the end of September, minor revisions two weeks later, accepted one week after revisions. A very good submission experience, wishing TAFM continued success.

(0) 讚！ | 草原小勇士

To submit, but not listed as a required item.

(0) 讚！ | Klin

The review speed is very fast! It only took two hours for the initial review, two days for the revision, and the whole process from submission to acceptance took 30 days! Looking forward to being included in the first tier of the Chinese Academy of Sciences soon.

(0) 讚！ | Klin

2025.04.02 stj
2025.04.02 under review
2025.05.07 major revision
2025.06.12 under review
2025.07.07 minor revision
2025.07.10 under review
2025.07.22 minor revision
2025.07.23 under review
2025.07.24 accept
2025.07.25 online
Editor-in-chief L. Susmel is very efficient, sending for review on the same day without delay. The main time consumption comes from the review process, with reviewers providing detailed feedback that greatly helps improve the article.

(0) 讚！ | chenyiliu

2025.06.25 stj
2025.06.26 we
2025.06.26 under review
2025.07.15 major revise
2025.08.08 we
2025.08.08 under review

The editing efficiency is very high, almost submitting for review on the same day, mainly depending on the speed of the reviewers. The experts review the manuscript very meticulously.

(0) 讚！ | mmbcl

2025/7/14 stj
2025/7/14 we
2025/7/14 under review
2025/7/28 major revise
2025/8/7 under review
2025/8/11 accept
2025/8/13 online
The editing efficiency is very high, and the comments provided by the reviewers are very professional. This is one of the best submission experiences.

(0) 讚！ | 昆工zk

5.12 stj
5.12 we
5.25 under review
7.15 major revise
7.31 under review
8.7 accept
The editing efficiency is very high, and the comments given by the reviewers are very professional. One of the reviewers disappeared for a month, but overall it was a relatively pleasant submission experience.

(0) 讚！ | langlee

Later, how long does the second trial take, friend?

(0) 讚！ | Jianhui Zhang

Dear friend, I would like to ask if it is necessary to submit response letters when revising this journal. I forgot to submit them and waited for fourteen days. The reviewer's feedback was requesting response letters. The email stated it was minor revisions, but in this case, it seems like it is not minor revisions. Could it be that the reviewer did not read it?

(0) 讚！ | Jianhui Zhang

The editor-in-chief handles it very quickly, I haven't even seen the DIP, basically the RRC editor-in-chief handled it as soon as they started work for the day.

(0) 讚！ | #收收收

Has anyone submitted anything recently? I'm curious about everyone's progress.

(0) 讚！ | hopeour

My submission will be reviewed in 10 days.

(0) 讚！ | langlee

How long will it take for DIP?

(0) 讚！ | langlee

I am basically one day.

(0) 讚！ | #收收收